Wordcraft: a Human-AI Collaborative Editor for Story Writing
Open accessAbstract
As neural language models grow in effectiveness, they are increasingly being applied in real-world settings. However these applications tend to be limited in the modes of interaction they support. In this extended abstract, we propose Wordcraft, an AI-assisted editor for story writing in which a writer and a dialog system collaborate to write a story. Our novel interface uses few-shot learning and the natural affordances of conversation to support a variety of interactions. Our editor provides a sandbox for writers to probe the boundaries of transformer-based language models and paves the way for future human-in-the-loop training pipelines and novel evaluation methods.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
When AI support is designed to gradually transfer responsibility to students as they develop greater competence, AI's contributions may act as complementary aids, reinforcing students' sense of agency and promoting a supportive, guided learning experience.
“When implemented in this manner, AI's contributions may act as complementary aids, reinforcing students' sense of agency and promoting a supportive, guided learning experience [21].”
From AI-Integrated Scaffolding to Enhance Agency and Creativity in K-12 English Language Learners: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [21]
Students valued the dialog-based AI tool for its conversational support, using it to refine narratives, expand ideas, and experiment with genre conventions.
“Students valued the tool for its conversational support, using it to refine narratives, expand ideas, and experiment with genre conventions.”
From AI-Integrated Scaffolding to Enhance Agency and Creativity in K-12 English Language Learners: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [21]
Coenen et al. examined professional writers' use of AI assistants like Wordcraft for genre exploration and world building, highlighting both opportunities and challenges in maintaining authorial voice.
“Coenen et al. [21] examined professional writers' use of AI assistants like Wordcraft for genre exploration and world building, highlighting both opportunities and challenges in maintaining authorial voice.”
From AI-Integrated Scaffolding to Enhance Agency and Creativity in K-12 English Language Learners: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [21]
Coenen et al. found that the few-shot learning approach enabled AI to adapt to different tasks without retraining, promoting fluid collaboration between human and machine during writing.
“The few-shot learning approach enabled AI to adapt to different tasks without retraining, which promoted fluid collaboration between human and machine during writing.”
From AI-Integrated Scaffolding to Enhance Agency and Creativity in K-12 English Language Learners: A Systematic Review (2025) · cites this paper as [21]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 11 · Cited by 35
- Authors
- Coenen, A., Davis, L., Ippolito, D., Reif, E., & Yuan, A.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2107.07430
- OpenAlex
- W3180374035
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (FA8750-19-2-1004, FA8750)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- AI-assisted writing, story writing, human-AI collaboration, dialogue systems, few-shot learning, conversational interfaces, transformer language models, human-in-the-loop learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
