CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High carbon stock mapping at large scale with optical satellite imagery and spaceborne LIDAR

Lang, Nico, Schindler, Konrad, Wegner, Jan Dirk·2021·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2107.07431arXiv 2107.07431
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The increasing demand for commodities is leading to changes in land use worldwide. In the tropics, deforestation, which causes high carbon emissions and threatens biodiversity, is often linked to agricultural expansion. While the need for deforestation-free global supply chains is widely recognized, making progress in practice remains a challenge. Here, we propose an automated approach that aims to support conservation and sustainable land use planning decisions by mapping tropical landscapes at large scale and high spatial resolution following the High Carbon Stock (HCS) approach. A deep learning approach is developed that estimates canopy height for each 10 m Sentinel-2 pixel by learning from sparse GEDI LIDAR reference data, achieving an overall RMSE of 6.3 m. We show that these wall-to-wall maps of canopy top height are predictive for classifying HCS forests and degraded areas with an overall accuracy of 86 % and produce a first high carbon stock map for Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Philippines.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2107.07431

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The approach scales up previous regional deep learning methods to process the entire global landmass.

    “While retrieval of vegetation parameters with deep learning has been demonstrated regionally and up to country scale16–19, we scale it up and process the entire global landmass.”

    From A high-resolution canopy height model of the Earth (2023) · cites this paper as [18]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Karger, D. N., Kessler, M., Lehnert, M. & Jetz, W. Lim- ited protection and ongoing loss of tropical cloud forest biodiversity and ecosystems worldwide. Nat. Ecol. & Evol. 1-9 (2021).
  2. Austin, K. G., Schwantes, A., Gu, Y. & Kasibhatla, P. S. What causes deforestation in Indonesia? Environ. Res. Lett. 14, 024007 (2019).
  3. Dubayah, R. et al. The global ecosystem dynamics in- vestigation: High-resolution laser ranging of the Earth's forests and topography. Sci. Remote. Sens. 1, 100002 (2020).
  4. Saatchi, S. S. et al. Benchmark map of forest carbon stocks in tropical regions across three continents. Proc. national academy sciences 108, 9899-9904 (2011).
  5. Silva, C. A. et al. Comparison of small-and large- footprint lidar characterization of tropical forest above- ground structure and biomass: A case study from central gabon. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Appl. Earth Obs. Remote. Sens. 11, 3512-3526 (2018).
  6. Qi, W., Saarela, S., Armston, J., Ståhl, G. & Dubayah, R. Forest biomass estimation over three distinct forest types using tandem-x insar data and simulated gedi lidar data. Remote. Sens. Environ. 232, 111283 (2019).
  7. Lang, N. et al. Global canopy height estimation with GEDI LIDAR waveforms and Bayesian deep learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.03975 (2021). · arXiv
  8. Lang, N., Schindler, K. & Wegner, J. D. Country-wide high-resolution vegetation height mapping with Sentinel- 2. Remote. Sens. Environ. 233, 111347 (2019).
  9. Rodríguez, A. C., D'Aronco, S., Schindler, K. & Wegner, J. D. Mapping oil palm density at country scale: An active learning approach. Remote. Sens. Environ. 261, 112479 (2021).
  10. Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In International Conference on Learning Representations (2015).
  11. Lakshminarayanan, B., Pritzel, A. & Blundell, C. Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.01474 (2016). · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Lang, N., Schindler, K., & Wegner, J. D.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2107.07431
arXiv
2107.07431
References
5
Type
Preprint
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review