CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 2,965Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningVisual Attention and Saliency Detection

YOLOX: Exceeding YOLO Series in 2021

Open access
Ge, Zheng, Liu, Songtao, Wang, Feng, Li, Zeming, Sun, Jian·2021·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2107.08430arXiv 2107.08430
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In this report, we present some experienced improvements to YOLO series, forming a new high-performance detector -- YOLOX. We switch the YOLO detector to an anchor-free manner and conduct other advanced detection techniques, i.e., a decoupled head and the leading label assignment strategy SimOTA to achieve state-of-the-art results across a large scale range of models: For YOLO-Nano with only 0.91M parameters and 1.08G FLOPs, we get 25.3% AP on COCO, surpassing NanoDet by 1.8% AP; for YOLOv3, one of the most widely used detectors in industry, we boost it to 47.3% AP on COCO, outperforming the current best practice by 3.0% AP; for YOLOX-L with roughly the same amount of parameters as YOLOv4-CSP, YOLOv5-L, we achieve 50.0% AP on COCO at a speed of 68.9 FPS on Tesla V100, exceeding YOLOv5-L by 1.8% AP. Further, we won the 1st Place on Streaming Perception Challenge (Workshop on Autonomous Driving at CVPR 2021) using a single YOLOX-L model. We hope this report can provide useful experience for developers and researchers in practical scenes, and we also provide deploy versions with ONNX, TensorRT, NCNN, and Openvino supported. Source code is at https://github.com/Megvii-BaseDetection/YOLOX.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2107.08430

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The YOLO family, MobileNet and its derivative-based backbones, and EfficientNet-Lite backbones are very suitable for deployment with a lower number of parameters while retaining higher performance.

    “In general, the analyses show that the YOLO family [52,71,104,112] of network architectures and MobileNet and its derivative-based [40,53] and EfficientNet-Lite [56] backbones are very suitable for deployment with a lower number of parameters while retaining higher performance.”

    From A survey on deep learning-based monocular spacecraft pose estimation: Current state, limitations and prospects (2023) · cites this paper as [112]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. [2][2] Nicolas Carion, Francisco Massa, Gabriel Synnaeve, Nicolas Usunier, Alexander Kirillov, and Sergey Zagoruyko. End-toend object detection with transformers. In ECCV , 2020. 1, 4 -
  2. [3][3] Qiang Chen, Yingming Wang, Tong Yang, Xiangyu Zhang, Jian Cheng, and Jian Sun. You only look one-level feature. In CVPR , 2021. 3 -
  3. [4][4] Zheng Ge, Songtao Liu, Zeming Li, Osamu Yoshie, and Jian Sun. Ota: Optimal transport assignment for object detection. In CVPR , 2021. 1, 4 -
  4. [5][5] Zheng Ge, Jianfeng Wang, Xin Huang, Songtao Liu, and Osamu Yoshie. Lla: Loss-aware label assignment for dense pedestrian detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.04307 , 2021. 4 - · arXiv
  5. [6][6] Golnaz Ghiasi, Yin Cui, Aravind Srinivas, Rui Qian, TsungYi Lin, Ekin D Cubuk, Quoc V Le, and Barret Zoph. Simple copy-paste is a strong data augmentation method for instance segmentation. In CVPR , 2021. 5 -
  6. [8][8] Priya Goyal, Piotr Doll´ ar, Ross Girshick, Pieter Noordhuis, Lukasz Wesolowski, Aapo Kyrola, Andrew Tulloch, Yangqing Jia, and Kaiming He. Accurate, large minibatch sgd: Training imagenet in 1 hour. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.02677 , 2017. 2 - · arXiv
  7. [10][10] Zhang Hongyi, Cisse Moustapha, N. Dauphin Yann, and David Lopez-Paz. mixup: Beyond empirical risk minimization. ICLR , 2018. 3 -
  8. [11][11] Xin Huang, Xinxin Wang, Wenyu Lv, Xiaying Bai, Xiang Long, Kaipeng Deng, Qingqing Dang, Shumin Han, Qiwen Liu, Xiaoguang Hu, et al. Pp-yolov2: A practical object detector. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.10419 , 2021. 3, 6 - · arXiv
  9. [12][12] Kang Kim and Hee Seok Lee. Probabilistic anchor assignment with iou prediction for object detection. In ECCV , 2020. 1, 4 -
  10. [13][13] Seung-Wook Kim, Hyong-Keun Kook, Jee-Young Sun, Mun-Cheon Kang, and Sung-Jea Ko. Parallel feature pyramid network for object detection. In ECCV , 2018. 2 -
  11. [14][14] Hei Law and Jia Deng. Cornernet: Detecting objects as paired keypoints. In ECCV , 2018. 1, 3 -
  12. [15][15] Mengtian Li, Yuxiong Wang, and Deva Ramanan. Towards streaming perception. In ECCV , 2020. 5, 6 -
  13. [17][17] Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Doll´ ar, and C Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context. In ECCV , 2014. 2 -
  14. [18][18] Songtao Liu, Di Huang, and Yunhong Wang. Learning spatial fusion for single-shot object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.09516 , 2019. 6 - · arXiv
  15. [19][19] Shu Liu, Lu Qi, Haifang Qin, Jianping Shi, and Jiaya Jia. Path aggregation network for instance segmentation. In CVPR , 2018. 2, 5 -
  16. [20][20] Shu Liu, Lu Qi, Haifang Qin, Jianping Shi, and Jiaya Jia. Path aggregation network for instance segmentation. In CVPR , 2018. 2 -
  17. [22][22] Yuchen Ma, Songtao Liu, Zeming Li, and Jian Sun. Iqdet: Instance-wise quality distribution sampling for object detection. In CVPR , 2021. 1, 4 -
  18. [24][24] Joseph Redmon and Ali Farhadi. Yolo9000: Better, faster, stronger. In CVPR , 2017. 1, 3 -
  19. [25][25] Joseph Redmon and Ali Farhadi. Yolov3: An incremental improvement. arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.02767 , 2018. 1, 2, 3 - · arXiv
  20. [26][26] Shaoqing Ren, Kaiming He, Ross Girshick, and Jian Sun. Faster r-cnn: Towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. In NeurIPS , 2015. 1 -
  21. [27][27] Guanglu Song, Yu Liu, and Xiaogang Wang. Revisiting the sibling head in object detector. In CVPR , 2020. 2 -
  22. [30][30] Chien-Yao Wang, Alexey Bochkovskiy, and HongYuan Mark Liao. Scaled-yolov4: Scaling cross stage partial network. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.08036 , 2020. 1, 5, 6 - · arXiv
  23. [31][31] Chien-Yao Wang, Hong-Yuan Mark Liao, Yueh-Hua Wu, Ping-Yang Chen, Jun-Wei Hsieh, and I-Hau Yeh. Cspnet: Anew backbone that can enhance learning capability of cnn. In CVPR workshops , 2020. 2, 5 -
  24. [32][32] Jianfeng Wang, Lin Song, Zeming Li, Hongbin Sun, Jian Sun, and Nanning Zheng. End-to-end object detection with fully convolutional network. In CVPR , 2020. 1 -
  25. [34][34] Yue Wu, Yinpeng Chen, Lu Yuan, Zicheng Liu, Lijuan Wang, Hongzhi Li, and Yun Fu. Rethinking classification and localization for object detection. In CVPR , 2020. 2 -
  26. [35][35] Yue Wu, Yinpeng Chen, Lu Yuan, Zicheng Liu, Lijuan Wang, Hongzhi Li, and Yun Fu. Rethinking classification and localization for object detection. In CVPR , 2020. 2 -
  27. [36][36] Shifeng Zhang, Cheng Chi, Yongqiang Yao, Zhen Lei, and Stan Z Li. Bridging the gap between anchor-based and anchor-free detection via adaptive training sample selection. In CVPR , 2020. 1, 4 -
  28. [37][37] Xiaosong Zhang, Fang Wan, Chang Liu, Rongrong Ji, and Qixiang Ye. Freeanchor: Learning to match anchors for visual object detection. In NeurIPS , 2019. 1, 4 -
  29. [38][38] Zhi Zhang, Tong He, Hang Zhang, Zhongyuan Zhang, Junyuan Xie, and Mu Li. Bag of freebies for training object detection neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1902.04103 , 2019. 3, 5 - · arXiv
  30. [39][39] Qiang Zhou, Chaohui Yu, Chunhua Shen, Zhibin Wang, and Hao Li. Object detection made simpler by eliminating heuristic nms. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.11782 , 2021. 1, 4 - · arXiv
  31. [40][40] Xingyi Zhou, Dequan Wang, and Philipp Kr¨ ahenb¨ uhl. Objects as points. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.07850 , 2019. 1, 3 - · arXiv
  32. [41][41] Benjin Zhu, Jianfeng Wang, Zhengkai Jiang, Fuhang Zong, Songtao Liu, Zeming Li, and Jian Sun. Autoassign: Differentiable label assignment for dense object detection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.03496 , 2020. 1, 4 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ge, Z., Liu, S., Wang, F., Li, Z., & Sun, J.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2107.08430
arXiv
2107.08430
OpenAlex
W3184439416
Cited by
2,965
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 64 · 2025: 392 · 2024: 1026 · 2023: 1013 · 2022: 449 · 2021: 21
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
Keywords
YOLOX, object detection, anchor-free detection, decoupled head, YOLOv3, YOLOv5, real-time detection, autonomous driving perception, model deployment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review