CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 21Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Information and CryptographyQuantum many-body systems

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Mitigating noise in digital and digital-analog quantum computation

Open access
García-Molina, Paula, Martin, Ana, de Andoin, Mikel Garcia, Sanz, Mikel·2021·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2107.12969arXiv 2107.12969
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) devices lack error correction, limiting scalability for quantum algorithms. In this context, digital-analog quantum computing (DAQC) offers a more resilient alternative quantum computing paradigm that outperforms digital quantum computation by combining the flexibility of single-qubit gates with the robustness of analog simulations. This work explores the impact of noise on both digital and DAQC paradigms and demonstrates DAQC's effectiveness in error mitigation. We compare the quantum Fourier transform and quantum phase estimation algorithms under a wide range of single and two-qubit noise sources in superconducting processors. DAQC consistently surpasses digital approaches in fidelity, particularly as processor size increases. Moreover, zero-noise extrapolation further enhances DAQC by mitigating decoherence and intrinsic errors, achieving fidelities above 0.95 for 8 qubits, and reducing computation errors to the order of $10^{-3}$. These results establish DAQC as a viable alternative for quantum computing in the NISQ era.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2107.12969

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The digital-analog approach allows for universal simulation of quantum dynamics while replacing two-qubit gates with an analog Hamiltonian and has been argued to be more resilient against certain types of noise than digital quantum computing.

    “This approach allows for universal simulation of quantum dynamics while replacing two-qubit gates for an analog Hamiltonian and has been argued to be more resilient against certain types of noise than digital quantum computing (García-Molina et al. , 2021; Martin et al. , 2020; Parra-Rodriguez et al. , 2020).”

    From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as García-Molina et al., 2021

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Benioff, P. The computer as a physical system: a microscopic quantum mechanical Hamiltonian model of computers as represented by Turing machines. J. Stat. Phys. 22, 563 (1980).
  2. Feynman, R. P. Simulating physics with computers. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 21, 467 (1982).
  3. Deutsch, D. Quantum theory, the Church-Turing principle and the universal quantum computer. Proc. R. Soc. A 400, 97 (1985).
  4. Kadowaki, T. & Nishimori, H. Quantum annealing in the transverse Ising model. Phys. Rev. E 58, 5355 (1998).
  5. Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., Gutmann, S. & Sipser, M. Quantum computation by adiabatic evolution. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/ 10.48550/arXiv.quant-ph/0001106 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  6. Albash, T. & Lidar, D. A. Adiabatic quantum computation. Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015002 (2018).
  7. Parra-Rodriguez, A., Lougovski, P., Lamata, L., Solano, E. & Sanz, M. Digital-analog quantum computation. Phys. Rev. A 101, 022305 (2020).
  8. Lamata, L., Parra-Rodriguez, A., Sanz, M. & Solano, E. Digital-analog quantum simulations with superconducting circuits. Adv. Phys.: X 3, 1457981 (2018).
  9. Céleri, L. C. et al. Digital-analog quantum simulation of fermionic models. Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 064086 (2023).
  10. Martin, A., Lamata, L., Solano, E. & Sanz, M. Digital-analog quantum algorithm for the quantum Fourier transform. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 013012 (2020).
  11. Headley, D. et al. Approximating the quantum approximate optimization algorithm with digital-analog interactions. Phys. Rev. A 106, 042446 (2021).
  12. Cirac, J. I. & Zoller, P. Quantum computations with cold trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 4091 (1995).
  13. Wintersperger, K. et al. Neutral atom quantum computing hardware: performance and end-user perspective. EPJ Quantum Technol. 10, 32 (2023).
  14. Devoret, M. H., Wallraff, A. & Martinis, J. M. Superconducting qubits: a short review. Preprint at arXiv https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.cond- mat/0411174 (2004). · DOI
  15. Zhang, Y., Deng, H., Li, Q., Song, H. & Nie, L. Optimizing Quantum Programs Against Decoherence: Delaying Qubits into Quantum Superposition. 13th International Symposium on Theoretical Aspects of Software Engineering (TASE), July 29-August 1, (2019).
  16. Sarovar, M. et al. Detecting crosstalk errors in quantum information processors. Quantum 4, 321 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42005-024-01812-5 · DOI
  17. Shor, P. W. Scheme for reducing decoherence in quantum computer memory. Phys. Rev. A 52, 2493 (1995).
  18. Bennett, C. H., DiVincenzo, D. P., Smolin, J. A. & Wootters, W. K. Mixed-state entanglement and quantum error correction. Phys. Rev. A 54, 3824 (1996).
  19. Preskill, J. Quantum computing in the NISQ era and beyond. Quantum 2, 79 (2018).
  20. Barthi, K. et al. Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms. Rev. Mod. Phys. 94, 015004 (2022).
  21. Gonzalez-Raya, T. et al. Digital-analog quantum simulations using the cross-resonance effect. PRX Quantum 2, 020328 (2021).
  22. Endo, S., Benjamin, S. C. & Li, Y. Practical quantum error mitigation for near-future applications. Phys. Rev. X 8, 031027 (2018).
  23. Kandala, A. et al. Error mitigation extends the computational reach of noisy quantum processor. Nature 567, 491 (2019).
  24. Endo, S., Cai, Z., Benjamin, S. C. & Yuan, X. Hybrid quantum-classical algorithms and quantum error mitigation. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 90, 032001 (2021).
  25. Shor, P. W. Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer. SIAM J. Comput. 26, 1484 (1996).
  26. Martin, A. et al. Toward pricing financial derivatives with an IBM quantum computer. Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 013167 (2021).
  27. Gonzalez-Conde, J., Rodríguez-Rozas, Á., Solano, E. & Sanz, M. Efficient Hamiltonian simulation for solving option price dynamics. Phys. Rev. Res. 5, 043220 (2023).
  28. Harrow, A. W., Hassidim, A. & Lloyd, S. Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 150502 (2009).
  29. Lloyd, S., Mohseni, M. & Rebentrost, P. Quantum principal component analysis. Nat. Phys. 10, 631 (2014).
  30. Li, Y. & Benjamin, S. C. Efficient variational quantum simulator incorporating active error minimization. Phys. Rev. X 7, 021050 (2017).
  31. Temme, K., Bravyi, S. & Gambetta, J. M. Error mitigation for short- depth quantum circuits. Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 180509 (2017).
  32. Nielsen, M. A. and Chuang, I. L. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010).
  33. Endo, S., Zhao, Q., Li, Y., Benjamin, S. & Yuan, X. Mitigating algorithmic errors in a Hamiltonian simulation. Phys. Rev. X 99, 012334 (2019).
  34. Sun, J. et al. Mitigating realistic noise in practical noisy intermediate- scale quantum devices. Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 034026 (2021).
  35. Hakoshima, H., Matsuzaki, Y. & Endo, S. Relationship between costs for quantum error mitigation and non-Markovian measures. Phys. Rev. A 103, 012611 (2021).
  36. Czarnik, P., Arrasmith, A., Coles, P. J. & Cincio, L. Error mitigation with Clifford quantum-circuit data. Quantum 5, 592 (2021).
  37. Postler, L. et al. Experimental quantification of spatial correlations in quantum dynamics. Quantum 2, 90 (2018).
  38. Bermudez, A., Xu, X., Gutiérrez, M., Benjamin, S. C. & Müller, M. Fault- tolerant protection of near-term trapped-ion topological qubits under realistic noise sources. Phys. Rev. A 100, 062307 (2019).
  39. Yu, J., Retamal, J. C., Sanz, M., Solano, E. & Albarrán-Arriagada, F. Superconducting circuit architecture for digital-analog quantum computing. EPJ Quantum Technol. 9, 9 (2022).
  40. Porras, D. & Cirac, J. I. Effective quantum spin systems with trapped ions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 207901 (2004).
  41. Glaetzle, A. W., van Bijnen, R. M. W., Zoller, P. & Lechner, W. A coherent quantum annealer with Rydberg atoms. Nat. Commun. 8, 15813 (2017).
  42. Lloyd, S. A potentially realizable quantum computer. Science 261, 1569 (1993).
  43. Cory, D. G., Price, M. D. & Havel, T. F. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy: an experimentally accessible paradigm for quantum computing. Physica D 120, 82 (1998).
  44. Galicia, A., Ramon, B., Solano, E. & Sanz, M. Enhanced connectivity of nonlinearardware with digital-analog control. Phys. Rev. Res. 2, 033103 (2020).
  45. Garcia-de-Andoin, M. et al. Digital-analog quantum computation with arbitrary two-body Hamiltonians. Phys. Rev. Res. 6, 013280 (2024).
  46. Kraus, K. States, Effects and Operations: Fundamental Notions of Quantum Theory (Springer Verlag, 1983).
  47. Preskill, J. Lecture Notes for Ph219/CS219: Quantum Computation Chapter 3 (California Institute of Technology, 2018).
  48. Carmichael, H. J. Quantum jumps revisited: An overview of quantum trajectory theory (Quantum Future From Volta and Como to the Present and Beyond. Lecture Notes in Physics, vol 517. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1999).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
García-Molina, P., Martin, A., de Andoin, M. G., & Sanz, M.
Affiliations
  • University of the Basque Country (ES)
  • Ikerbasque (ES)
Corresponding author
García-Molina, Paula
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
Volume
7
Issue
1
ISSN
2399-3650 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2107.12969
arXiv
2107.12969
OpenAlex
W4403159355
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Communications Physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Communities in ADDI (University of the Basque Country) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • TECNALIA Publications (Fundación TECNALIA Research & Innovation) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Hispana (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades (RYC-2020-030503-I, FPU19, MCIN/AEI/10.13039, 13039, 10.13039, PID2021-125823NA-I00)
  • European Commission (101113946)
  • Eusko Jaurlaritza (899368, EXP.2022/01341, KK-2024/00105, PID2021-125823NA-I00, RYC-2020-030503-I, IT1470- 22, A/20220551, 2022/01341)
  • Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea (KK-2024)
  • Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MCIN/AEI/10, PID2021-125823NA-I00, 10.13039, / AEI/10, Y2020/TCS- 6545, IT1470-22, 13039, RYC-2020-030503-I, MCIN /AEI /10.13039)
  • Basque Center for Applied Mathematics
  • European Regional Development Fund (MCIN/AEI/10, 899368, PID2021-125823NA-I00, IT1470-22)
  • Agencia Estatal de Investigación (13039, MCIN / AEI/10, RYC-2020-030503-I, PTI-001, 10.13039, PID2021-125823NA-I00, AEI/10, PID2021, CAM 2020 Y2020/TCS-6545)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
error mitigation, NISQ devices, zero-noise extrapolation, quantum Fourier transform, quantum phase estimation, superconducting qubits, decoherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review