CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1Image and Video Quality AssessmentDigital Media Forensic DetectionImage Retrieval and Classification Techniques

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A survey on IQA

Open access
Wang, Lanjiang·2021·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2109.00347arXiv 2109.00347
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Image quality assessment(IQA) is of increasing importance for image-based applications. Its purpose is to establish a model that can replace humans for accurately evaluating image quality. According to whether the reference image is complete and available, image quality evaluation can be divided into three categories: full-reference(FR), reduced-reference(RR), and non-reference(NR) image quality assessment. Due to the vigorous development of deep learning and the widespread attention of researchers, several non-reference image quality assessment methods based on deep learning have been proposed in recent years, and some have exceeded the performance of reduced -reference or even full-reference image quality assessment models. This article will review the concepts and metrics of image quality assessment and also video quality assessment, briefly introduce some methods of full-reference and semi-reference image quality assessment, and focus on the non-reference image quality assessment methods based on deep learning. Then introduce the commonly used synthetic database and real-world database. Finally, summarize and present challenges.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2109.00347

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 99

  1. [1][1] Christos G Bampis, Praful Gupta, Rajiv Soundararajan, and Alan C Bovik. Speed-qa: Spatial efficient entropic differencing for image and video quality. IEEE signal processing letters , 24 (9):1333-1337, 2017. -
  2. [2][2] Christos George Bampis, Zhi Li, Anush Krishna Moorthy, Ioannis Katsavounidis, Anne Aaron, and Alan Conrad Bovik. Study of temporal effects on subjective video quality of experience. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , 26(11):5217-5231, 2017. -
  3. [3][3] Ali Borji and Laurent Itti. State-of-the-art in visual attention modeling. IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence , 35(1):185-207, 2012. -
  4. [4][4] Nicolas Carion, Francisco Massa, Gabriel Synnaeve, Nicolas Usunier, Alexander Kirillov, and Sergey Zagoruyko. End-to-end object detection with transformers. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 213-229. Springer, 2020. -
  5. [5][5] Chao Chen, Mohammad Izadi, and Anil Kokaram. A perceptual quality metric for videos distorted by spatially correlated noise. In Proceedings of the 24th ACM international conference on Multimedia , pages 1277-1285, 2016. -
  6. [6][6] Xiaoyu Chen, Hongliang Li, Qingbo Wu, King Ngi Ngan, and Linfeng Xu. High-quality r-cnn object detection using multi-path detection calibration network. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , 31(2):715-727, 2020. -
  7. [7][7] Xiaoyu Chen, Hongliang Li, Qingbo Wu, Fanman Meng, and Heqian Qiu. Bal-r2cnn: High quality recurrent object detection with balance optimization. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia , 2021. -
  8. [9][9] Li Sze Chow and Raveendran Paramesran. Review of medical image quality assessment. Biomedical signal processing and control , 27:145-154, 2016. -
  9. [10][10] Jisheng Ding, Linfeng Xu, Jiangtao Guo, and Shengxuan Dai. Human detection in dense scene of classrooms. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) , pages 618-622. IEEE, 2020. -
  10. [11][11] Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, Sylvain Gelly, Jakob Uszkoreit, and Neil Houlsby. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. CoRR , abs/2010.11929, 2020. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2010 .11929 . - · arXiv
  11. [12][12] Deepti Ghadiyaram and Alan C Bovik. Massive online crowdsourced study of subjective and objective picture quality. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , 25(1):372-387, 2015. -
  12. [13][13] Deepti Ghadiyaram and Alan C Bovik. Perceptual quality prediction on authentically distorted images using a bag of features approach. Journal of vision , 17(1):32-32, 2017. -
  13. [14][14] Ke Gu, Guangtao Zhai, Xiaokang Yang, and Wenjun Zhang. A new reduced-reference image quality assessment using structural degradation model. In 2013 IEEE international symposium on circuits and systems (ISCAS) , pages 1095-1098. IEEE, 2013. -
  14. [15][15] Jiangtao Guo, Linfeng Xu, Jisheng Ding, Bin He, Shengxuan Dai, and Fangyu Liu. A deep supervised edge optimization algorithm for salt body segmentation. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters , 2020. -
  15. [16][16] Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 770-778, 2016. -
  16. [17][17] Lihuo He, Fei Gao, Weilong Hou, and Lei Hao. Objective image quality assessment: a survey. International Journal of Computer Mathematics , 91(11):2374-2388, 2014. -
  17. [18][18] Dinesh Jayaraman, Anish Mittal, Anush K Moorthy, and Alan C Bovik. Objective quality assessment of multiply distorted images. In 2012 Conference record of the forty sixth asilomar conference on signals, systems and computers (ASILOMAR) , pages 1693-1697. IEEE, 2012. -
  18. [19][19] Pengjun Ji, Yuchun Fang, Zhonghua Zhou, and Jiazhen Zhu. Fusion of mssim and svm for reduced-reference facial image quality assessment. In Chinese Conference on Biometric Recognition , pages 75-82. Springer, 2012. -
  19. [20][20] Weiping Ji, Jinjian Wu, Man Zhang, Zuozhi Liu, Guangming Shi, and Xuemei Xie. Blind image quality assessment with joint entropy degradation. IEEE Access , 7:30925-30936, 2019. -
  20. [21][21] Stanley A Klein, Thom Carney, Lauren Barghout-Stein, and Christopher W Tyler. Seven models of masking. In Human Vision and Electronic Imaging II , volume 3016, pages 13-24. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 1997. -
  21. [22][22] Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey E Hinton. Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. Advances in neural information processing systems , 25: 1097-1105, 2012. -
  22. [23][23] Eric Cooper Larson and Damon Michael Chandler. Most apparent distortion: full-reference image quality assessment and the role of strategy. Journal of electronic imaging , 19(1):011006, 2010. -
  23. [24][24] Dingquan Li, Tingting Jiang, and Ming Jiang. Quality assessment of in-the-wild videos. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages 2351-2359, 2019. -
  24. [25][25] Hui Li, Qingbo Wu, King Ngi Ngan, Hongliang Li, and Fanman Meng. Region adaptive two-shot network for single image dehazing. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) , pages 1-6. IEEE, 2020. -
  25. [26][26] Hui Li, Qingbo Wu, Haoran Wei, King Ngi Ngan, Hongliang Li, Fanman Meng, and Linfeng Xu. Haze-robust image understanding via context-aware deep feature refinement. In 2020 IEEE 22nd International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP) , pages 1-6. IEEE, 2020. -
  26. [27][27] Hui Li, Qingbo Wu, King Ngi Ngan, Hongliang Li, and Fanman Meng. Single image dehazing via region adaptive two-shot network. IEEE MultiMedia , 2021. -
  27. [28][28] Leida Li, Weisi Lin, Xuesong Wang, Gaobo Yang, Khosro Bahrami, and Alex C Kot. Noreference image blur assessment based on discrete orthogonal moments. IEEE transactions on cybernetics , 46(1):39-50, 2015. -
  28. [29][29] Qiang Li and Zhou Wang. Reduced-reference image quality assessment using divisive normalization-based image representation. IEEE journal of selected topics in signal processing , 3(2):202-211, 2009. -
  29. [30][30] Wei Li, Qingbo Wu, Linfeng Xu, and Chao Shang. Incremental learning of single-stage detectors with mining memory neurons. In 2018 IEEE 4th International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC) , pages 1981-1985. IEEE, 2018. -
  30. [31][31] Wei Li, Hongliang Li, Qingbo Wu, Xiaoyu Chen, and King Ngi Ngan. Simultaneously detecting and counting dense vehicles from drone images. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics , 66(12):9651-9662, 2019. -
  31. [32][32] Wei Li, Hongliang Li, Qingbo Wu, Fanman Meng, Linfeng Xu, and King Ngi Ngan. Headnet: An end-to-end adaptive relational network for head detection. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , 30(2):482-494, 2019. -
  32. [33][33] Wei Li, Zhenting Wang, Xiao Wu, Ji Zhang, Qiang Peng, and Hongliang Li. Codan: Countingdriven attention network for vehicle detection in congested scenes. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages 73-82, 2020. -
  33. [34][34] Zhi Li, Anne Aaron, Ioannis Katsavounidis, Anush Moorthy, and Megha Manohara. Toward a practical perceptual video quality metric. The Netflix Tech Blog , 6(2), 2016. -
  34. [36][36] Hanhe Lin, Vlad Hosu, and Dietmar Saupe. Koniq-10k: Towards an ecologically valid and large-scale iqa database. arXiv preprint arXiv:1803.08489 , 2018. - · arXiv
  35. [37][37] Kwan-Yee Lin and Guanxiang Wang. Hallucinated-iqa: No-reference image quality assessment via adversarial learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 732-741, 2018. -
  36. [38][38] Hantao Liu, Nick Klomp, and Ingrid Heynderickx. A no-reference metric for perceived ringing artifacts in images. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , 20(4): 529-539, 2009. -
  37. [39][39] Xialei Liu, Joost Van De Weijer, and Andrew D Bagdanov. Rankiqa: Learning from rankings for no-reference image quality assessment. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision , pages 1040-1049, 2017. -
  38. [40][40] Hao Luo, Hanxiao Luo, Qingbo Wu, King Ngi Ngan, Hongliang Li, Fanman Meng, and Linfeng Xu. Single image deraining via multi-scale gated feature enhancement network. In International Forum on Digital TV and Wireless Multimedia Communications , pages 73-84. Springer, 2020. -
  39. [41][41] Kunming Luo, Fanman Meng, Qingbo Wu, and Hongliang Li. Weakly supervised semantic segmentation by multiple group cosegmentation. In 2018 IEEE Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP) , pages 1-4. IEEE, 2018. -
  40. [42][42] Kede Ma, Wentao Liu, Tongliang Liu, Zhou Wang, and Dacheng Tao. dipiq: Blind image quality assessment by learning-to-rank discriminable image pairs. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , 26(8):3951-3964, 2017. -
  41. [43][43] Fanman Meng, Lili Guo, Qingbo Wu, and Hongliang Li. A new deep segmentation quality assessment network for refining bounding box based segmentation. IEEE Access , 7:5951459523, 2019. -
  42. [44][44] Anish Mittal, Anush Krishna Moorthy, and Alan Conrad Bovik. No-reference image quality assessment in the spatial domain. IEEE Transactions on image processing , 21(12):4695-4708, 2012. -
  43. [45][45] Anish Mittal, Michele A Saad, and Alan C Bovik. A completely blind video integrity oracle. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , 25(1):289-300, 2015. -
  44. [46][46] Pedram Mohammadi, Abbas Ebrahimi-Moghadam, and Shahram Shirani. Subjective and objective quality assessment of image: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.7799 , 2014. - · arXiv
  45. [47][47] Anush Krishna Moorthy and Alan Conrad Bovik. Visual importance pooling for image quality assessment. IEEE journal of selected topics in signal processing , 3(2):193-201, 2009. -
  46. [48][48] Jincheol Park, Kalpana Seshadrinathan, Sanghoon Lee, and Alan Conrad Bovik. Video quality pooling adaptive to perceptual distortion severity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , 22 (2):610-620, 2012. -
  47. [49][49] G. Piella and H. Heijmans. A new quality metric for image fusion. In Proceedings 2003 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.03CH37429) , volume 3, pages III-173, 2003. doi: 10.1109/ICIP.2003.1247209. - · DOI
  48. [50][50] Nikolay Ponomarenko, Vladimir Lukin, Alexander Zelensky, Karen Egiazarian, Marco Carli, and Federica Battisti. Tid2008-a database for evaluation of full-reference visual quality assessment metrics. Advances of Modern Radioelectronics , 10(4):30-45, 2009. -
  49. [51][51] Nikolay Ponomarenko, Oleg Ieremeiev, Vladimir Lukin, Karen Egiazarian, Lina Jin, Jaakko Astola, Benoit Vozel, Kacem Chehdi, Marco Carli, Federica Battisti, et al. Color image database tid2013: Peculiarities and preliminary results. In european workshop on visual information processing (EUVIP) , pages 106-111. IEEE, 2013. -
  50. [52][52] Ekta Prashnani, Hong Cai, Yasamin Mostofi, and Pradeep Sen. Pieapp: Perceptual image-error assessment through pairwise preference. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 1808-1817, 2018. -
  51. [53][53] Heqian Qiu, Hongliang Li, Qingbo Wu, Fanman Meng, King Ngi Ngan, and Hengcan Shi. A2rmnet: Adaptively aspect ratio multi-scale network for object detection in remote sensing images. Remote Sensing , 11(13):1594, 2019. -
  52. [54][54] Heqian Qiu, Hongliang Li, Qingbo Wu, Fanman Meng, Linfeng Xu, King Ngi Ngan, and Hengcan Shi. Hierarchical context features embedding for object detection. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia , 22(12):3039-3050, 2020. -
  53. [55][55] Heqian Qiu, Hongliang Li, Qingbo Wu, and Hengcan Shi. Offset bin classification network for accurate object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition , pages 13188-13197, 2020. -
  54. [56][56] Abdul Rehman and Zhou Wang. Reduced-reference image quality assessment by structural similarity estimation. IEEE transactions on image processing , 21(8):3378-3389, 2012. -
  55. [57][57] Snjezana Rimac-Drlje, Mario Vranjes, and Drago Zagar. Influence of temporal pooling method on the objective video quality evaluation. In 2009 IEEE International Symposium on Broadband Multimedia Systems and Broadcasting , pages 1-5. IEEE, 2009. -
  56. [58][58] Michele A Saad, Alan C Bovik, and Christophe Charrier. Blind prediction of natural video quality. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , 23(3):1352-1365, 2014. -
  57. [59][59] Kalpana Seshadrinathan and Alan C Bovik. Temporal hysteresis model of time varying subjective video quality. In 2011 IEEE international conference on acoustics, speech and signal processing (ICASSP) , pages 1153-1156. IEEE, 2011. -
  58. [60][60] Kalpana Seshadrinathan and Alan Conrad Bovik. Motion tuned spatio-temporal quality assessment of natural videos. IEEE transactions on image processing , 19(2):335-350, 2009. -
  59. [61][61] Michael Seufert, Martin Slanina, Sebastian Egger, and Meik Kottkamp. 'to pool or not to pool': A comparison of temporal pooling methods for http adaptive video streaming. In 2013 Fifth International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX) , pages 52-57. IEEE, 2013. -
  60. [62][62] Chao Shang, Qingbo Wu, Fanman Meng, and Linfeng Xu. Instance segmentation by learning deep feature in embedding space. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) , pages 2444-2448. IEEE, 2019. -
  61. [63][63] Hamid R Sheikh and Alan C Bovik. Image information and visual quality. IEEE Transactions on image processing , 15(2):430-444, 2006. -
  62. [64][64] Hamid R Sheikh, Muhammad F Sabir, and Alan C Bovik. A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms. IEEE Transactions on image processing , 15(11):3440-3451, 2006. -
  63. [65][65] Hengcan Shi, Hongliang Li, Fanman Meng, and Qingbo Wu. Key-word-aware network for referring expression image segmentation. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) , pages 38-54, 2018. -
  64. [66][66] Hengcan Shi, Hongliang Li, Qingbo Wu, and King Ngi Ngan. Query reconstruction network for referring expression image segmentation. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia , 23:995-1007, 2020. -
  65. [67][67] Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. Very deep convolutional networks for large-scale image recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.1556 , 2014. - · arXiv
  66. [68][68] Christian Szegedy, Wei Liu, Yangqing Jia, Pierre Sermanet, Scott Reed, Dragomir Anguelov, Dumitru Erhan, Vincent Vanhoucke, and Andrew Rabinovich. Going deeper with convolutions. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition , pages 1-9, 2015. -
  67. [69][69] Bart Thomee, David A Shamma, Gerald Friedland, Benjamin Elizalde, Karl Ni, Douglas Poland, Damian Borth, and Li-Jia Li. Yfcc100m: The new data in multimedia research. Communications of the ACM , 59(2):64-73, 2016. -
  68. [70][70] Domonkos Varga. No-reference video quality assessment based on the temporal pooling of deep features. Neural Processing Letters , 50(3):2595-2608, 2019. -
  69. [71][71] Domonkos Varga, Dietmar Saupe, and Tamás Szirányi. Deeprn: A content preserving deep architecture for blind image quality assessment. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (ICME) , pages 1-6. IEEE, 2018. -
  70. [72][72] Phong V Vu and Damon M Chandler. Vis3: an algorithm for video quality assessment via analysis of spatial and spatiotemporal slices. Journal of Electronic Imaging , 23(1):013016, 2014. -
  71. [73][73] Bo Wang, Zhibing Wang, Yupeng Liao, and Xinggang Lin. Hvs-based structural similarity for image quality assessment. In 2008 9th International Conference on Signal Processing , pages 1194-1197. IEEE, 2008. -
  72. [74][74] Lanxiao Wang, Chao Shang, Heqian Qiu, Taijin Zhao, Benliu Qiu, and Hongliang Li. Multistage tag guidance network in video caption. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Multimedia , pages 4610-4614, 2020. -
  73. [75][75] Zhou Wang. Applications of objective image quality assessment methods [applications corner]. IEEE signal processing magazine , 28(6):137-142, 2011. -
  74. [76][76] Zhou Wang and Eero P Simoncelli. Reduced-reference image quality assessment using a wavelet-domain natural image statistic model. In Human vision and electronic imaging X , volume 5666, pages 149-159. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 2005. -
  75. [77][77] Zhou Wang, Eero P Simoncelli, and Alan C Bovik. Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment. In The Thrity-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems & Computers, 2003 , volume 2, pages 1398-1402. Ieee, 2003. -
  76. [78][78] Zhou Wang, Alan C Bovik, Hamid R Sheikh, and Eero P Simoncelli. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE transactions on image processing , 13(4): 600-612, 2004. -
  77. [79][79] Haoran Wei, Qingbo Wu, Hui Li, King Ngi Ngan, Hongliang Li, and Fanman Meng. Single image dehazing via artificial multiple shots and multidimensional context. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) , pages 1023-1027. IEEE, 2020. -
  78. [80][80] Haoran Wei, Qingbo Wu, Hui Li, King Ngi Ngan, Hongliang Li, Fanman Meng, and Linfeng Xu. Non-homogeneous haze removal via artificial scene prior and bidimensional graph reasoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.01888 , 2021. - · arXiv
  79. [82][82] Jinjian Wu, Jichen Zeng, Weisheng Dong, Guangming Shi, and Weisi Lin. Blind image quality assessment with hierarchy: Degradation from local structure to deep semantics. Journal of Visual Communication and Image Representation , 58:353-362, 2019. -
  80. [83][83] Qingbo Wu, Hongliang Li, Fanman Meng, King N Ngan, Bing Luo, Chao Huang, and Bing Zeng. Blind image quality assessment based on multichannel feature fusion and label transfer. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , 26(3):425-440, 2015. -
  81. [84][84] Qingbo Wu, Zhou Wang, and Hongliang Li. A highly efficient method for blind image quality assessment. In 2015 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) , pages 339-343. IEEE, 2015. -
  82. [85][85] Qingbo Wu, Hongliang Li, King N Ngan, and Kede Ma. Blind image quality assessment using local consistency aware retriever and uncertainty aware evaluator. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , 28(9):2078-2089, 2017. -
  83. [86][86] Qingbo Wu, Lei Wang, King N Ngan, Hongliang Li, and Fanman Meng. Beyond synthetic data: A blind deraining quality assessment metric towards authentic rain image. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP) , pages 2364-2368. IEEE, 2019. -
  84. [87][87] Qingbo Wu, Li Chen, King Ngi Ngan, Hongliang Li, Fanman Meng, and Linfeng Xu. A unified single image de-raining model via region adaptive coupled network. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP) , pages 1-4. IEEE, 2020. -
  85. [88][88] Qingbo Wu, Lei Wang, King Ngi Ngan, Hongliang Li, Fanman Meng, and Linfeng Xu. Subjective and objective de-raining quality assessment towards authentic rain image. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology , 30(11):3883-3897, 2020. -
  86. [89][89] Feng Xiao, Joyce E. Farrell, and Brian A. Wandell. Psychophysical thresholds and digital camera sensitivity: the thousand-photon limit. In Nitin Sampat, Jeffrey M. DiCarlo, and Ricardo J. Motta, editors, Digital Photography , volume 5678, pages 75 - 84. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, 2005. URL https://doi.org/10.1117/12.587 468 . - · DOI
  87. [90][90] Jingtao Xu, Peng Ye, Yong Liu, and David Doermann. No-reference video quality assessment via feature learning. In 2014 IEEE international conference on image processing (ICIP) , pages 491-495. IEEE, 2014. -
  88. [91][91] Xiaolong Xu, Fanman Meng, Hongliang Li, Qingbo Wu, Yuwei Yang, and Shuai Chen. Bounding box based annotation generation for semantic segmentation by boundary detection. In 2019 International Symposium on Intelligent Signal Processing and Communication Systems (ISPACS) , pages 1-2. IEEE, 2019. -
  89. [92][92] Qingsen Yan, Dong Gong, and Yanning Zhang. Two-stream convolutional networks for blind image quality assessment. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , 28(5):2200-2211, 2018. -
  90. [93][93] Longrong Yang, Hongliang Li, Qingbo Wu, Fanman Meng, and King Ngi Ngan. Mono is enough: Instance segmentation from single annotated sample. In 2020 IEEE International Conference on Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP) , pages 120-123. IEEE, 2020. -
  91. [94][94] Longrong Yang, Fanman Meng, Hongliang Li, Qingbo Wu, and Qishang Cheng. Learning with noisy class labels for instance segmentation. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pages 38-53. Springer, 2020. -
  92. [95][95] Xiaohan Yang, Fan Li, Wei Zhang, and Lijun He. Blind image quality assessment of natural scenes based on entropy differences in the dct domain. Entropy , 20(11):885, 2018. -
  93. [96][96] Xiaohan Yang, Fan Li, and Hantao Liu. A survey of dnn methods for blind image quality assessment. IEEE Access , 7:123788-123806, 2019. -
  94. [97][97] Yuwei Yang, Fanman Meng, Hongliang Li, King N Ngan, and Qingbo Wu. A new few-shot segmentation network based on class representation. In 2019 IEEE Visual Communications and Image Processing (VCIP) , pages 1-4. IEEE, 2019. -
  95. [98][98] Yuwei Yang, Fanman Meng, Hongliang Li, Qingbo Wu, Xiaolong Xu, and Shuai Chen. A new local transformation module for few-shot segmentation. In International Conference on Multimedia Modeling , pages 76-87. Springer, 2020. -
  96. [99][99] Junyong You and Jari Korhonen. Transformer for image quality assessment. CoRR , abs/2101.01097, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2101.01097 . - · arXiv
  97. [100][100] Lin Zhang, Lei Zhang, Xuanqin Mou, and David Zhang. Fsim: A feature similarity index for image quality assessment. IEEE transactions on Image Processing , 20(8):2378-2386, 2011. -
  98. [101][101] Lin Zhang, Lei Zhang, and Alan C Bovik. A feature-enriched completely blind image quality evaluator. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , 24(8):2579-2591, 2015. -
  99. [102][102] Yu Zhou, Leida Li, Shiqi Wang, Jinjian Wu, Yuming Fang, and Xinbo Gao. No-reference quality assessment for view synthesis using dog-based edge statistics and texture naturalness. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing , 28(9):4566-4579, 2019.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Wang, L.
Affiliations
University of Electronic Science and Technology of China (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Lanjiang
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2109.00347
arXiv
2109.00347
OpenAlex
W4311304958
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
Keywords
image quality assessment, no-reference image quality assessment, reduced-reference image quality assessment, full-reference image quality assessment, video quality assessment, image quality metrics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A survey on IQA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2109.00347
The paper
Wang, L. (2021). A survey on IQA. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2109.00347