CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 129Speech Recognition and SynthesisBiometric Identification and SecuritySpeech and Audio Processing

ASVspoof 2021: Automatic Speaker Verification Spoofing and Countermeasures Challenge Evaluation Plan

Open access
Delgado, Héctor, Evans, Nicholas, Kinnunen, Tomi, Lee, Kong Aik, Liu, Xuechen, Nautsch, Andreas, Patino, Jose, Sahidullah, Md +3 more·2021·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2109.00535arXiv 2109.00535
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The automatic speaker verification spoofing and countermeasures (ASVspoof) challenge series is a community-led initiative which aims to promote the consideration of spoofing and the development of countermeasures. ASVspoof 2021 is the 4th in a series of bi-annual, competitive challenges where the goal is to develop countermeasures capable of discriminating between bona fide and spoofed or deepfake speech. This document provides a technical description of the ASVspoof 2021 challenge, including details of training, development and evaluation data, metrics, baselines, evaluation rules, submission procedures and the schedule.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2109.00535

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neural networks applied to DeepFake detection are particularly prone to generalization and stability issues.

    “Neural networks (as well as other machine learning models) applied to the DeepFake detection problem are particularly prone to two common issues - generalization and stability.”

    From Attack Agnostic Dataset: Towards Generalization and Stabilization of Audio DeepFake Detection (2022) · cites this paper as [16]

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 6 · Cited by 129

Authors
Delgado, H., Evans, N., Kinnunen, T., Lee, K. A., Liu, X., Nautsch, A., Patino, J., Sahidullah, M., Todisco, M., Wang, X., & Yamagishi, J.
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2109.00535
arXiv
2109.00535
OpenAlex
W3198123200
Cited by
129
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2015: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
Keywords
speaker verification, anti-spoofing, spoofing countermeasures, spoofed speech, evaluation metrics, biometric security

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review