PreprintCited by 20Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsArtificial Intelligence in GamesAI-based Problem Solving and Planning

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

MiniHack the Planet: A Sandbox for Open-Ended Reinforcement Learning Research

Open access

Abstract

Progress in deep reinforcement learning (RL) is heavily driven by the availability of challenging benchmarks used for training agents. However, benchmarks that are widely adopted by the community are not explicitly designed for evaluating specific capabilities of RL methods. While there exist environments for assessing particular open problems in RL (such as exploration, transfer learning, unsupervised environment design, or even language-assisted RL), it is generally difficult to extend these to richer, more complex environments once research goes beyond proof-of-concept results. We present MiniHack, a powerful sandbox framework for easily designing novel RL environments. MiniHack is a one-stop shop for RL experiments with environments ranging from small rooms to complex, procedurally generated worlds. By leveraging the full set of entities and environment dynamics from NetHack, one of the richest grid-based video games, MiniHack allows designing custom RL testbeds that are fast and convenient to use. With this sandbox framework, novel environments can be designed easily, either using a human-readable description language or a simple Python interface. In addition to a variety of RL tasks and baselines, MiniHack can wrap existing RL benchmarks and provide ways to seamlessly add additional complexity.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2109.13202

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MiniHack and NLE contain enough complexity to test for many types and strengths of non-visual generalisation but save on computation due to the lack of complex visual processing required.

    “These environments contain enough complexity to test for many types and strengths of non-visual generalisation but save on computation due to the lack of complex visual processing required.”

    From A Survey of Zero-shot Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement Learning (2023) · cites this paper as Samvelyan et al., 2021

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • A Survey of Zero-shot Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement Learning

    Kirk, R., Zhang, A., Grefenstette, E., & Rocktäschel, T. (2023) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.14174 · Cited by 193

    “If testing for non-visual types of generalisation, then visually simple domains such as MiniHack (Samvelyan et al., 2021) and NLE (Küttler et al.”
    BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
  • Human-Timescale Adaptation in an Open-Ended Task Space

    Adaptive Agent Team, Bauer, J., Baumli, K., Baveja, S., Behbahani, F., Bhoopchand, A., Bradley-Schmieg, N., Chang, M., Clay, N., Collister, A., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.07608 · Cited by 19

    “…in the past few years a series of challenging PCG environments have been proposed (Juliani et al., 2019; Cobbe et al., 2020; K¨uttler et al., 2020; Samvelyan et al., 2021; Chevalier-Boisvert et al., 2018; Hafner, 2022; Deitke et al., 2022), mostly focusing on testing and improving generalisation…”
    BackgroundSelf-citation
  • Craftax: A Lightning-Fast Benchmark for Open-Ended Reinforcement Learning

    Matthews, M., Beukman, M., Ellis, B., Samvelyan, M., Jackson, M., Coward, S., & Foerster, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.16801 · Cited by 4

    “NetHack is an infamously difficult video game, adapted into an RL benchmark through The NetHack Learning Environment (NLE) (Küttler et al., 2020) and MiniHack (Samvelyan et al., 2021).”
    BackgroundMethodSelf-citation
  • BALROG: Benchmarking Agentic LLM and VLM Reasoning On Games

    Paglieri, D., Cupiał, B., Coward, S., Piterbarg, U., Wolczyk, M., Khan, A., Pignatelli, E., Kuciński, Ł., Pinto, L., Fergus, R., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.13543 · Cited by 2

    “(Samvelyan et al., 2021) MiniHack is a multi-task framework built on top of the NetHack Learning Environment (K ¨ uttler et al., 2020).”
    Self-citation
  • A Study of Global and Episodic Bonuses for Exploration in Contextual MDPs

    Henaff, M., Jiang, M., & Raileanu, R. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.03236 · Cited by 1

    “…counts: A number of recent exploration algorithms have used inverse counts of (x, y) locations to drive exploration in gridworlds, for example RIDE (Raileanu & Rocktäschel, 2020; Samvelyan et al., 2021), AGAC (Flet-Berliac et al., 2021) and NovelD (Zhang et al., 2021b; Henaff et al., 2022).”
    BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation

Metadata

Authors
Samvelyan, M., Kirk, R., Kurin, V., Parker-Holder, J., Jiang, M., Hambro, E., Petroni, F., Küttler, H., Grefenstette, E., & Rocktäschel, T.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Meta (Israel) (IL)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3196714515
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
Keywords
NetHack, procedural environment generation, environmental design, benchmarking, exploration, transfer learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review