The DOI matches its DataCite record.
MiniHack the Planet: A Sandbox for Open-Ended Reinforcement Learning Research
Open accessAbstract
Progress in deep reinforcement learning (RL) is heavily driven by the availability of challenging benchmarks used for training agents. However, benchmarks that are widely adopted by the community are not explicitly designed for evaluating specific capabilities of RL methods. While there exist environments for assessing particular open problems in RL (such as exploration, transfer learning, unsupervised environment design, or even language-assisted RL), it is generally difficult to extend these to richer, more complex environments once research goes beyond proof-of-concept results. We present MiniHack, a powerful sandbox framework for easily designing novel RL environments. MiniHack is a one-stop shop for RL experiments with environments ranging from small rooms to complex, procedurally generated worlds. By leveraging the full set of entities and environment dynamics from NetHack, one of the richest grid-based video games, MiniHack allows designing custom RL testbeds that are fast and convenient to use. With this sandbox framework, novel environments can be designed easily, either using a human-readable description language or a simple Python interface. In addition to a variety of RL tasks and baselines, MiniHack can wrap existing RL benchmarks and provide ways to seamlessly add additional complexity.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
MiniHack and NLE contain enough complexity to test for many types and strengths of non-visual generalisation but save on computation due to the lack of complex visual processing required.
“These environments contain enough complexity to test for many types and strengths of non-visual generalisation but save on computation due to the lack of complex visual processing required.”
From A Survey of Zero-shot Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement Learning (2023) · cites this paper as Samvelyan et al., 2021
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Survey of Zero-shot Generalisation in Deep Reinforcement Learning
Kirk, R., Zhang, A., Grefenstette, E., & Rocktäschel, T. (2023) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.1.14174 · Cited by 193
“If testing for non-visual types of generalisation, then visually simple domains such as MiniHack (Samvelyan et al., 2021) and NLE (Küttler et al.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationHuman-Timescale Adaptation in an Open-Ended Task Space
Adaptive Agent Team, Bauer, J., Baumli, K., Baveja, S., Behbahani, F., Bhoopchand, A., Bradley-Schmieg, N., Chang, M., Clay, N., Collister, A., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.07608 · Cited by 19
“…in the past few years a series of challenging PCG environments have been proposed (Juliani et al., 2019; Cobbe et al., 2020; K¨uttler et al., 2020; Samvelyan et al., 2021; Chevalier-Boisvert et al., 2018; Hafner, 2022; Deitke et al., 2022), mostly focusing on testing and improving generalisation…”
BackgroundSelf-citationCraftax: A Lightning-Fast Benchmark for Open-Ended Reinforcement Learning
Matthews, M., Beukman, M., Ellis, B., Samvelyan, M., Jackson, M., Coward, S., & Foerster, J. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.16801 · Cited by 4
“NetHack is an infamously difficult video game, adapted into an RL benchmark through The NetHack Learning Environment (NLE) (Küttler et al., 2020) and MiniHack (Samvelyan et al., 2021).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationBALROG: Benchmarking Agentic LLM and VLM Reasoning On Games
Paglieri, D., Cupiał, B., Coward, S., Piterbarg, U., Wolczyk, M., Khan, A., Pignatelli, E., Kuciński, Ł., Pinto, L., Fergus, R., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.13543 · Cited by 2
“(Samvelyan et al., 2021) MiniHack is a multi-task framework built on top of the NetHack Learning Environment (K ¨ uttler et al., 2020).”
Self-citationA Study of Global and Episodic Bonuses for Exploration in Contextual MDPs
Henaff, M., Jiang, M., & Raileanu, R. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.03236 · Cited by 1
“…counts: A number of recent exploration algorithms have used inverse counts of (x, y) locations to drive exploration in gridworlds, for example RIDE (Raileanu & Rocktäschel, 2020; Samvelyan et al., 2021), AGAC (Flet-Berliac et al., 2021) and NovelD (Zhang et al., 2021b; Henaff et al., 2022).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Samvelyan, M., Kirk, R., Kurin, V., Parker-Holder, J., Jiang, M., Hambro, E., Petroni, F., Küttler, H., Grefenstette, E., & Rocktäschel, T.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Meta (Israel) (IL)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2109.13202
- OpenAlex
- W3196714515
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
- Keywords
- NetHack, procedural environment generation, environmental design, benchmarking, exploration, transfer learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review