CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 20Battery Modeling and ManagementElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureAdvancements in Battery Materials

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

To Charge or to Sell? EV Pack Useful Life Estimation via LSTMs, CNNs, and Autoencoders

Open access
Bosello, Michael, Falcomer, Carlo, Rossi, Claudio, Pau, Giovanni·2021·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2110.03585arXiv 2110.03585
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Electric vehicles (EVs) are spreading fast as they promise to provide better performance and comfort, but above all, to help face climate change. Despite their success, their cost is still a challenge. Lithium-ion batteries are one of the most expensive EV components, and have become the standard for energy storage in various applications. Precisely estimating the remaining useful life (RUL) of battery packs can encourage their reuse and thus help to reduce the cost of EVs and improve sustainability. A correct RUL estimation can be used to quantify the residual market value of the battery pack. The customer can then decide to sell the battery when it still has a value, i.e., before it exceeds the end of life of the target application, so it can still be reused in a second domain without compromising safety and reliability. This paper proposes and compares two deep learning approaches to estimate the RUL of Li-ion batteries: LSTM and autoencoders vs. CNN and autoencoders. The autoencoders are used to extract useful features, while the subsequent network is then used to estimate the RUL. Compared to what has been proposed so far in the literature, we employ measures to ensure the method's applicability in the actual deployed application. Such measures include (1) avoiding using non-measurable variables as input, (2) employing appropriate datasets with wide variability and different conditions, and (3) predicting the remaining ampere-hours instead of the number of cycles. The results show that the proposed methods can generalize on datasets consisting of numerous batteries with high variance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2110.03585

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 54

  1. [1]1. Hofmann, J.; Guan, D.; Chalvatzis, K.; Huo, H. Assessment of electrical vehicles as a successful driver for reducing CO2 emissions in China. Appl. Energy 2016 , 184 , 995-1003. [CrossRef]
  2. [2]2. Zou, Y.; Wei, S.; Sun, F.; Hu, X.; Shiao, Y. Large-scale deployment of electric taxis in Beijing: A real-world analysis. Energy 2016 , 100 , 25-39. [CrossRef]
  3. [5]5. Kleeman, M.J.; Schauer, J.J.; Cass, G.R. Size and Composition Distribution of Fine Particulate Matter Emitted from Motor Vehicles. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2000 , 34 , 1132-1142. [CrossRef]
  4. [6]6. Kheirbek, I.; Haney, J.; Douglas, S.; Ito, K.; Matte, T. The contribution of motor vehicle emissions to ambient fine particulate matter public health impacts in New York City: A health burden assessment. Environ. Health 2016 , 15 , 89. [CrossRef]
  5. [7]7. Koolen, C.D.; Rothenberg, G. Air pollution in Europe. ChemSusChem 2019 , 12 , 164-172. [CrossRef]
  6. [8]8. Anderson, H.R.; Atkinson, R.W.; Peacock, J.L.; Sweeting, M.J.; Marston, L. Ambient particulate matter and health effects: Publication bias in studies of short-term associations. Epidemiology 2005 , 16 , 155-163. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. [9]9. Brunekreef, B.; Forsberg, B. Epidemiological evidence of effects of coarse airborne particles on health. Eur. Respir. J. 2005 , 26 , 309-318. [CrossRef]
  8. [10]10. Opitz, A.; Badami, P.; Shen, L.; Vignarooban, K.; Kannan, A. Can Li-Ion batteries be the panacea for automotive applications? Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017 , 68 , 685-692. [CrossRef]
  9. [11]11. Manzetti, S.; Mariasiu, F. Electric vehicle battery technologies: From present state to future systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015 , 51 , 1004-1012. [CrossRef]
  10. [12]12. Hannan, M.; Lipu, M.; Hussain, A.; Mohamed, A. A review of lithium-ion battery state of charge estimation and management system in electric vehicle applications: Challenges and recommendations. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017 , 78 , 834-854. [CrossRef] concept of cycles. The results show that the particular autoencoder employed can extract the dominant features of the cycle curves, and that both the CNN and the LSTM proposed can predict the RUL based on those features. Several directions are open for future investigation. While the results obtained on such complex data are encouraging, there is still room for improvement. It would be interesting to design a network that provides the advantages of both the CNN (well-fitted curves) and the LSTM (no offset). In addition, transformers [61], which have achieved impressive results in recent times, should be studied. This kind of NN can learn temporal dependencies that are even longer than the ones learnable by an LSTM. Therefore, it is quite promising for the objective. To the best of the authors' knowledge, this kind of NN has not been tested yet for RUL estimation. The transformer will substitute the current LSTM, in the hope of achieving even better performances. The improvement of battery RUL estimation can support the development of battery recycling. Still, policies will be required to fully develop it, either with economic incentives [62] or with the involvement of governments [63]. Further work in this direction is also advised. Author Contributions: Conceptualization, M.B. and C.F.; methodology, M.B.; software, M.B.; validation, M.B.; formal analysis, M.B.; investigation, M.B.; resources, G.P.; data curation, M.B.; writingoriginal draft preparation, M.B.; writing-review and editing, M.B.; visualization, M.B.; supervision, G.P. and C.R.; project administration, G.P.; funding acquisition, G.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Funding: This research was funded by the LiBER project under the POR FESR program by Emilia Romagna Region, years 2019-2022. Data Availability Statement: Data are available from the sources cited in the article. The UNIBO Powertools dataset is available at https://doi.org/10.17632/n6xg5fzsbv.1 and the Nasa Randomized Battery Usage dataset is available at https://www.nasa.gov/content/prognostics-center-ofexcellence-data-set-repository (accessed on 15 March 2023). Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. · DOI
  11. [13]13. Zhang, S.; Zhai, B.; Guo, X.; Wang, K.; Peng, N.; Zhang, X. Synchronous estimation of state of health and remaining useful lifetime for lithium-ion battery using the incremental capacity and artificial neural networks. J. Energy Storage 2019 , 26 , 100951. [CrossRef]
  12. [14]14. Liu, D.; Zhou, J.; Peng, Y. Data-driven prognostics and remaining useful life estimation for lithium-ion battery: A review. Instrumentation 2014 , 1, 59-70.
  13. [15]15. Hu, X.; Cao, D.; Egardt, B. Condition monitoring in advanced battery management systems: Moving horizon estimation using a reduced electrochemical model. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 2017 , 23 , 167-178. [CrossRef]
  14. [16]16. Williard, N.; He, W.; Hendricks, C.; Pecht, M. Lessons Learned from the 787 Dreamliner Issue on Lithium-Ion Battery Reliability. Energies 2013 , 6 , 4682-4695. [CrossRef]
  15. [20]20. Bilgin, B.; Magne, P.; Malysz, P.; Yang, Y.; Pantelic, V.; Preindl, M.; Korobkine, A.; Jiang, W.; Lawford, M.; Emadi, A. Making the Case for Electrified Transportation. IEEE Trans. Transp. Electrif. 2015 , 1 , 4-17. [CrossRef]
  16. [21]21. Mahmoudzadeh Andwari, A.; Pesiridis, A.; Rajoo, S.; Martinez-Botas, R.; Esfahanian, V. A review of Battery Electric Vehicle technology and readiness levels. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017 , 78 , 414-430. [CrossRef]
  17. [22]22. Wu, Y.; Xue, Q.; Shen, J.; Lei, Z.; Chen, Z.; Liu, Y. State of Health Estimation for Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Healthy Features and Long Short-Term Memory. IEEE Access 2020 , 8 , 28533-28547. [CrossRef]
  18. [23]23. Johnson, N. 19-Battery technology for CO2 reduction. In Alternative Fuels and Advanced Vehicle Technologies for Improved Environmental Performance ; Folkson, R., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2014; pp. 582-631. [CrossRef]
  19. [24]24. Barré, A.; Deguilhem, B.; Grolleau, S.; Gérard, M.; Suard, F.; Riu, D. A review on lithium-ion battery ageing mechanisms and estimations for automotive applications. J. Power Sources 2013 , 241 , 680-689. [CrossRef]
  20. [25]25. Xiong, R.; Li, L.; Tian, J. Towards a smarter battery management system: A critical review on battery state of health monitoring methods. J. Power Sources 2018 , 405 , 18-29. [CrossRef]
  21. [26]26. Lu, L.; Han, X.; Li, J.; Hua, J.; Ouyang, M. A review on the key issues for lithium-ion battery management in electric vehicles. J. Power Sources 2013 , 226 , 272-288. [CrossRef]
  22. [27]27. Fan, Y.; Xiao, F.; Li, C.; Yang, G.; Tang, X. A novel deep learning framework for state of health estimation of lithium-ion battery. J. Energy Storage 2020 , 32 , 101741. [CrossRef]
  23. [28]28. Vidal, C.; Malysz, P.; Kollmeyer, P.; Emadi, A. Machine Learning Applied to Electrified Vehicle Battery State of Charge and State of Health Estimation: State-of-the-Art. IEEE Access 2020 , 8 , 52796-52814. [CrossRef]
  24. [31]31. IEEE Std 450-2020 (Revision IEEE Std 450-2010) ; IEEE Recommended Practice for Maintenance, Testing, and Replacement of Vented Lead-Acid Batteries for Stationary Applications. IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 1-71.
  25. [32]32. Duong, T.Q. USABC and PNGV test procedures. J. Power Sources 2000 , 89 , 244-248. [CrossRef]
  26. [33]33. Xing, Y.; Ma, E.W.; Tsui, K.L.; Pecht, M. An ensemble model for predicting the remaining useful performance of lithium-ion batteries. Microelectron. Reliab. 2013 , 53 , 811-820. [CrossRef]
  27. [35]35. Chen, Y.; He, Y.; Li, Z.; Chen, L.; Zhang, C. Remaining Useful Life Prediction and State of Health Diagnosis of Lithium-Ion Battery Based on Second-Order Central Difference Particle Filter. IEEE Access 2020 , 8 , 37305-37313. [CrossRef]
  28. [36]36. Li, X.; Shu, X.; Shen, J.; Xiao, R.; Yan, W.; Chen, Z. An On-Board Remaining Useful Life Estimation Algorithm for Lithium-Ion Batteries of Electric Vehicles. Energies 2017 , 10 , 691. [CrossRef]
  29. [37]37. Ng, S.S.; Xing, Y.; Tsui, K.L. A naive Bayes model for robust remaining useful life prediction of lithium-ion battery. Appl. Energy 2014 , 118 , 114-123. [CrossRef]
  30. [38]38. Hu, X.; Feng, F.; Liu, K.; Zhang, L.; Xie, J.; Liu, B. State estimation for advanced battery management: Key challenges and future trends. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019 , 114 , 109334. [CrossRef]
  31. [39]39. Song, L.; Zhang, K.; Liang, T.; Han, X.; Zhang, Y. Intelligent state of health estimation for lithium-ion battery pack based on big data analysis. J. Energy Storage 2020 , 32 , 101836. [CrossRef]
  32. [40]40. Venugopal, P.; Vigneswaran, T. State-of-Health Estimation of Li-ion Batteries in Electric Vehicle Using IndRNN under Variable Load Condition. Energies 2019 , 12 , 4338. [CrossRef]
  33. [41]41. Ahmadi, L.; Yip, A.; Fowler, M.; Young, S.B.; Fraser, R.A. Environmental feasibility of re-use of electric vehicle batteries. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2014 , 6 , 64-74. [CrossRef]
  34. [42]42. Shen, S.; Sadoughi, M.; Chen, X.; Hong, M.; Hu, C. A deep learning method for online capacity estimation of lithium-ion batteries. J. Energy Storage 2019 , 25 , 100817. [CrossRef]
  35. [43]43. Harper, G.; Sommerville, R.; Kendrick, E.; Driscoll, L.; Slater, P.; Stolkin, R.; Walton, A.; Christensen, P.; Heidrich, O.; Lambert, S.; et al. Recycling lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles. Nature 2019 , 575 , 75-86. [CrossRef]
  36. [44]44. Pražanová, A.; Knap, V.; Stroe, D.-I. Literature Review, Recycling of Lithium-Ion Batteries from Electric Vehicles, Part II: Environmental and Economic Perspective. Energies 2022 , 15 , 7356. [CrossRef]
  37. [45]45. Lipu, M.H.; Hannan, M.; Hussain, A.; Hoque, M.; Ker, P.J.; Saad, M.; Ayob, A. A review of state of health and remaining useful life estimation methods for lithium-ion battery in electric vehicles: Challenges and recommendations. J. Clean. Prod. 2018 , 205 , 115-133. [CrossRef]
  38. [46]46. Dai, H.; Zhao, G.; Lin, M.; Wu, J.; Zheng, G. A Novel Estimation Method for the State of Health of Lithium-Ion Battery Using Prior Knowledge-Based Neural Network and Markov Chain. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2019 , 66 , 7706-7716. [CrossRef]
  39. [47]47. Krizhevsky, A.; Sutskever, I.; Hinton, G.E. ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 25 ; Pereira, F., Burges, C.J.C., Bottou, L., Weinberger, K.Q., Eds.; Curran Associates, Inc.: Red Hook, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 1097-1105.
  40. [48]48. Hametner, C.; Jakubek, S.; Prochazka, W. Data-driven design of a cascaded observer for battery state of health estimation. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies (ICSET), Hanoi, Vietnam, 14-16 November 2016; pp. 180-185. [CrossRef]
  41. [49]49. Hochreiter, S.; Schmidhuber, J. Long short-term memory. Neural Comput. 1997 , 9 , 1735-1780. [CrossRef]
  42. [50]50. Dos Reis, G.; Strange, C.; Yadav, M.; Li, S. Lithium-ion battery data and where to find it. Energy AI 2021 , 5 , 100081. . [CrossRef]
  43. [52]52. Ungurean, L.; Micea, M.V.; Cârstoiu, G. Online state of health prediction method for lithium-ion batteries, based on gated recurrent unit neural networks. Int. J. Energy Res. 2020 , 44 , 6767-6777. [CrossRef]
  44. [53]53. Zhou, D.; Li, Z.; Zhu, J.; Zhang, H.; Hou, L. State of Health Monitoring and Remaining Useful Life Prediction of Lithium-Ion Batteries Based on Temporal Convolutional Network. IEEE Access 2020 , 8 , 53307-53320. [CrossRef]
  45. [54]54. Zhang, Y.; Xiong, R.; He, H.; Liu, Z. A LSTM-RNN method for the lithuim-ion battery remaining useful life prediction. In Proceedings of the 2017 Prognostics and System Health Management Conference (PHM-Harbin), Harbin, China, 9-12 July 2017; pp. 1-4. [CrossRef]
  46. [55]55. Zhang, W.; Li, X.; Li, X. Deep learning-based prognostic approach for lithium-ion batteries with adaptive time-series prediction and on-line validation. Measurement 2020 , 164 , 108052. [CrossRef]
  47. [56]56. Li, P .; Zhang, Z.; Xiong, Q.; Ding, B.; Hou, J.; Luo, D.; Rong, Y.; Li, S. State-of-health estimation and remaining useful life prediction for the lithium-ion battery based on a variant long short term memory neural network. J. Power Sources 2020 , 459 , 228069. [CrossRef]
  48. [57]57. Ren, L.; Zhao, L.; Hong, S.; Zhao, S.; Wang, H.; Zhang, L. Remaining Useful Life Prediction for Lithium-Ion Battery: A Deep Learning Approach. IEEE Access 2018 , 6 , 50587-50598. [CrossRef]
  49. [58]58. Ren, L.; Dong, J.; Wang, X.; Meng, Z.; Zhao, L.; Deen, M.J. A Data-Driven Auto-CNN-LSTM Prediction Model for Lithium-Ion Battery Remaining Useful Life. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2021 , 17 , 3478-3487. [CrossRef]
  50. [59]59. Wong, K.L.; Bosello, M.; Tse, R.; Falcomer, C.; Rossi, C.; Pau, G. Li-Ion Batteries State-of-Charge Estimation Using Deep LSTM at Various Battery Specifications and Discharge Cycles. In Proceedings of the Conference on Information Technology for Social Good, GoodIT '21, Rome, Italy, 9-11 September 2021; Association for Computing Machinery: New York, NY, USA, 2021; pp. 85-90. [CrossRef]
  51. [60]60. Maggipinto, M.; Masiero, C.; Beghi, A.; Susto, G.A. A Convolutional Autoencoder Approach for Feature Extraction in Virtual Metrology. Procedia Manuf. 2018 , 17 , 126-133.
  52. [61]61. Vaswani, A.; Shazeer, N.; Parmar, N.; Uszkoreit, J.; Jones, L.; Gomez, A.N.; Kaiser, L.; Polosukhin, I. Attention Is All You Need. arXiv 2017 , arXiv:1706.03762. · arXiv
  53. [62]62. Tang, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Y.; Wang, G.; Li, Y. Recycling mechanisms and policy suggestions for spent electric vehicles' power battery-A case of Beijing. J. Clean. Prod. 2018 , 186 , 388-406. [CrossRef]
  54. [63]63. Hao, H.; Xu, W.; Wei, F.; Wu, C.; Xu, Z. Reward-Penalty vs. Deposit-Refund: Government Incentive Mechanisms for EV Battery Recycling. Energies 2022 , 15 , 6885. [CrossRef]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bosello, M., Falcomer, C., Rossi, C., & Pau, G.
Affiliations
  • Technology Innovation Institute (AE)
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Bosello, Michael
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
Volume
16
Issue
6
Pages
2837-2837
ISSN
1996-1073 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2110.03585
arXiv
2110.03585
OpenAlex
W4327966876
Cited by
20
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 6
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Energies (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
European Regional Development Fund (2019-2022)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Battery Modeling and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
Keywords
remaining useful life prediction, lithium-ion batteries, electric vehicle battery packs, battery reuse, battery end-of-life, autoencoder, long short-term memory, convolutional neural networks, battery degradation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review