PreprintCited by 30Speech Recognition and SynthesisSpeech and Audio ProcessingSpeech and dialogue systems

SpeechT5: Unified-Modal Encoder-Decoder Pre-Training for Spoken Language Processing

Open access
Ao, Junyi, Wang, Rui, Zhou, Long, Wang, Chengyi, Ren, Shuo, Wu, Yu, Liu, Shujie, Ko, Tom +6 more·2021·arXiv

Abstract

Motivated by the success of T5 (Text-To-Text Transfer Transformer) in pre-trained natural language processing models, we propose a unified-modal SpeechT5 framework that explores the encoder-decoder pre-training for self-supervised speech/text representation learning. The SpeechT5 framework consists of a shared encoder-decoder network and six modal-specific (speech/text) pre/post-nets. After preprocessing the input speech/text through the pre-nets, the shared encoder-decoder network models the sequence-to-sequence transformation, and then the post-nets generate the output in the speech/text modality based on the output of the decoder. Leveraging large-scale unlabeled speech and text data, we pre-train SpeechT5 to learn a unified-modal representation, hoping to improve the modeling capability for both speech and text. To align the textual and speech information into this unified semantic space, we propose a cross-modal vector quantization approach that randomly mixes up speech/text states with latent units as the interface between encoder and decoder. Extensive evaluations show the superiority of the proposed SpeechT5 framework on a wide variety of spoken language processing tasks, including automatic speech recognition, speech synthesis, speech translation, voice conversion, speech enhancement, and speaker identification. We release our code and model at https://github.com/microsoft/SpeechT5.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2110.07205

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing speech-language and audio-language models primarily focus on speech-text conversion, spoken dialogue, or speech generation rather than unified understanding of speech, music, and general audio.

    “These works demonstrate the feasibility of bringing speech into language-model-style generation and interaction, but their primary focus is speech-text conversion, spoken dialogue, or speech generation rather than unified understanding of speech, music, and general audio.”

    From MOSS-Audio Technical Report (2026) · cites this paper as [45]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ao, J., Wang, R., Zhou, L., Wang, C., Ren, S., Wu, Y., Liu, S., Ko, T., Li, Q., Zhang, Y., Wei, Z., Qian, Y., Li, J., & Wei, F.
Affiliations
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
  • Tongji University (CN)
  • Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4308349017
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 10
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Microsoft Research
  • Microsoft Research Asia
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
Keywords
self-supervised speech representations, speech-text alignment, sequence-to-sequence models, speech recognition, speech synthesis, speech translation, voice conversion, speech enhancement, speaker identification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review