The DOI matches its DataCite record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recurrent Off-policy Baselines for Memory-based Continuous Control
Open accessAbstract
When the environment is partially observable (PO), a deep reinforcement learning (RL) agent must learn a suitable temporal representation of the entire history in addition to a strategy to control. This problem is not novel, and there have been model-free and model-based algorithms proposed for this problem. However, inspired by recent success in model-free image-based RL, we noticed the absence of a model-free baseline for history-based RL that (1) uses full history and (2) incorporates recent advances in off-policy continuous control. Therefore, we implement recurrent versions of DDPG, TD3, and SAC (RDPG, RTD3, and RSAC) in this work, evaluate them on short-term and long-term PO domains, and investigate key design choices. Our experiments show that RDPG and RTD3 can surprisingly fail on some domains and that RSAC is the most reliable, reaching near-optimal performance on nearly all domains. However, one task that requires systematic exploration still proved to be difficult, even for RSAC. These results show that model-free RL can learn good temporal representation using only reward signals; the primary difficulty seems to be computational cost and exploration. To facilitate future research, we have made our PyTorch implementation publicly available at https://github.com/zhihanyang2022/off-policy-continuous-control.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The task provides dense rewards, so the credit assignment length is short, although the exact value is unclear.”
From When Do Transformers Shine in RL? Decoupling Memory from Credit Assignment (2023) · cites this paper as Yang and Nguyen, 2021
In the citing paper
“The optimal policy has to memorize the goal until it is reached.The policy memory length is thus long, but not necessarily the full horizon.”
From When Do Transformers Shine in RL? Decoupling Memory from Credit Assignment (2023) · cites this paper as Yang and Nguyen, 2021
In the citing paper
“The agent has to first explore to find out the correct bump, and then move towards it to receive a terminal reward.The credit assignment length is thus long.”
From When Do Transformers Shine in RL? Decoupling Memory from Credit Assignment (2023) · cites this paper as Yang and Nguyen, 2021
In the citing paper
“This offers a theoretical explanation for the practice of detaching critic parameters in the actor loss, adopted in prior works (Yarats et al., 2021a,b; Yang and Nguyen, 2021).”
From When Do Transformers Shine in RL? Decoupling Memory from Credit Assignment (2023) · cites this paper as Yang and Nguyen, 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
Soft Actor-Critic Algorithms and Applications
Haarnoja, T., Zhou, A., Hartikainen, K., Tucker, G., Ha, S., Tan, J., Kumar, V., Zhu, H., Gupta, A., Abbeel, P., et al. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1812.05905 · Cited by 1,994 · cited 2×
“For SAC and its recurrent version, the entropy regularizer α is initialized to 1 and auto-tuned as in [30], which implements [10].”
BackgroundMemory-based control with recurrent neural networks
Heess, N., Hunt, J. J., Lillicrap, T. P., & Silver, D. (2015) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1512.04455 · Cited by 211
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Greg Brockman, Vicki Cheung, Ludwig Pettersson, Jonas Schneider, John Schulman, Jie Tang, and Wojciech Zaremba. Openai gym. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.01540, 2016. · arXiv
- Laura M Chihara and Tim C Hesterberg. Mathematical statistics with resampling and R. John Wiley & Sons, 2018.
- Kyunghyun Cho, Bart Van Merriënboer, Caglar Gulcehre, Dzmitry Bahdanau, Fethi Bougares, Holger Schwenk, and Yoshua Bengio. Learning phrase representations using rnn encoder- decoder for statistical machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1406.1078, 2014. · arXiv
- Jeffrey L Elman. Finding structure in time. Cognitive science, 14(2):179-211, 1990.
- Scott Fujimoto, Herke Hoof, and David Meger. Addressing function approximation error in actor-critic methods. International Conference on Machine Learning, 2018.
- Yasuhiro Fujita, Prabhat Nagarajan, Toshiki Kataoka, and Takahiro Ishikawa. Chainerrl: A deep reinforcement learning library. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 22(77):1-14, 2021. URL http://jmlr.org/papers/v22/20-376.html.
- Klaus Greff, Rupesh K Srivastava, Jan Koutník, Bas R Steunebrink, and Jürgen Schmidhuber. Lstm: A search space odyssey. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems, 28 (10):2222-2232, 2016.
- Tuomas Haarnoja, Haoran Tang, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. Reinforcement learning with deep energy-based policies. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 1352-1361. PMLR, 2017.
- Tuomas Haarnoja, Aurick Zhou, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. Soft actor-critic: Off-policy maximum entropy deep reinforcement learning with a stochastic actor. International Conference on Machine Learning, 2018.
- Danijar Hafner, Timothy Lillicrap, Jimmy Ba, and Mohammad Norouzi. Dream to control: Learning behaviors by latent imagination. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.01603, 2019. · arXiv
- Danijar Hafner, Timothy Lillicrap, Ian Fischer, Ruben Villegas, David Ha, Honglak Lee, and James Davidson. Learning latent dynamics for planning from pixels. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 2555-2565. PMLR, 2019.
- Dongqi Han, Kenji Doya, and Jun Tani. Variational recurrent models for solving partially observable control tasks. International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
- Matthew Hausknecht and Peter Stone. Deep recurrent q-learning for partially observable mdps. In 2015 aaai fall symposium series, 2015.
- Maximilian Igl, Luisa Zintgraf, Tuan Anh Le, Frank Wood, and Shimon Whiteson. Deep varia- tional reinforcement learning for pomdps. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 2117-2126. PMLR, 2018.
- Leslie Pack Kaelbling, Michael L Littman, and Anthony R Cassandra. Planning and acting in partially observable stochastic domains. Artificial Intelligence, 101(1-2):99-134, 1998.
- Ilya Kostrikov, Denis Yarats, and Rob Fergus. Image augmentation is all you need: Regularizing deep reinforcement learning from pixels. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.13649, 2020. · arXiv
- Guillaume Lample and Devendra Singh Chaplot. Playing fps games with deep reinforcement learning. In Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2017.
- Alex X Lee, Anusha Nagabandi, Pieter Abbeel, and Sergey Levine. Stochastic latent actor-critic: Deep reinforcement learning with a latent variable model. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.00953, 2019. · arXiv
- Timothy P Lillicrap, Jonathan J Hunt, Alexander Pritzel, Nicolas Heess, Tom Erez, Yuval Tassa, David Silver, and Daan Wierstra. Continuous control with deep reinforcement learning. International Conference on Machine Learning, 2015.
- Xiao Ma, Peter Karkus, David Hsu, Wee Sun Lee, and Nan Ye. Discriminative particle filter reinforcement learning for complex partial observations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.09884, 2020. · arXiv
- Lingheng Meng, Rob Gorbet, and Dana Kulić. Memory-based deep reinforcement learning for pomdp. International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, 2021.
- Hai Nguyen, Brett Daley, Xinchao Song, Christopher Amato, and Robert Platt. Belief- grounded networks for accelerated robot learning under partial observability. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.09170, 2020. · arXiv
- Tianwei Ni, Benjamin Eysenbach, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. Recurrent model-free rl is a strong baseline for many pomdps. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.05038, 2021. · arXiv
- Emanuel Todorov, Tom Erez, and Yuval Tassa. Mujoco: A physics engine for model-based control. In 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, pages 5026-5033. IEEE, 2012.
- Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. Attention is all you need. In Advances in neural information processing systems, pages 5998-6008, 2017.
- Jiayi Weng, Huayu Chen, Dong Yan, Kaichao You, Alexis Duburcq, Minghao Zhang, Hang Su, and Jun Zhu. Tianshou: A highly modularized deep reinforcement learning library. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.14171, 2021. · arXiv
- Marvin Zhang, Zoe McCarthy, Chelsea Finn, Sergey Levine, and Pieter Abbeel. Learning deep neural network policies with continuous memory states. In 2016 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation (ICRA), pages 520-527. IEEE, 2016.
- Pengfei Zhu, Xin Li, Pascal Poupart, and Guanghui Miao. On improving deep reinforcement learning for pomdps. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.07978, 2017. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
When Do Transformers Shine in RL? Decoupling Memory from Credit Assignment
Ni, T., Ma, M., Eysenbach, B., & Bacon, P.-L. (2023) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 · doi:10.52202/075280-2194 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, Z., & Nguyen, H.
- Affiliations
- Carleton College (US)
- ORCID
- Yang, Zhihan
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2110.12628
- OpenAlex
- W3210787633
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Adaptive Dynamic Programming Control
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- partially observable environments, temporal representation learning, deep deterministic policy gradient, TD3, SAC, exploration, computational cost
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recurrent Off-policy Baselines for Memory-based Continuous Control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2110.12628
- The paper
- Yang, Z., & Nguyen, H. (2021). Recurrent Off-policy Baselines for Memory-based Continuous Control. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2110.12628
