Dataset of Fake News Detection and Fact Verification: A Survey
Open accessAbstract
The rapid increase in fake news, which causes significant damage to society, triggers many fake news related studies, including the development of fake news detection and fact verification techniques. The resources for these studies are mainly available as public datasets taken from Web data. We surveyed 118 datasets related to fake news research on a large scale from three perspectives: (1) fake news detection, (2) fact verification, and (3) other tasks; for example, the analysis of fake news and satire detection. We also describe in detail their utilization tasks and their characteristics. Finally, we highlight the challenges in the fake news dataset construction and some research opportunities that address these challenges. Our survey facilitates fake news research by helping researchers find suitable datasets without reinventing the wheel, and thereby, improves fake news studies in depth.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The spread of true and false news online
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aap9559 · Cited by 8,847 · cited 1× · see citing works
“There are few studies [107, 195, 224] leveraging the definition.”
BackgroundJindal, N., & Liu, B. (2008) · Proceedings of the international conference on Web search and web data mining - WSDM '08 · doi:10.1145/1341531.1341560 · Cited by 1,542 · see citing works
The Creation and Detection of Deepfakes: A Survey
Mirsky, Y., & Lee, W. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2004.11138 · Cited by 863
The Creation and Detection of Deepfakes: A Survey
Mirsky, Y., & Lee, W. (2022) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3425780 · Cited by 863 · see citing works
The Risk of Racial Bias in Hate Speech Detection
Sap, M., Card, D., Gabriel, S., Choi, Y., & Smith, N. A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-1163 · Cited by 817 · see citing works
Liu, Y., & Wu, Y.-F. (2018) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v32i1.11268 · Cited by 663 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Recent fake news detection models leverage textual information as well as rich contexts such as news publishers [236], user information [134], temporal information [146], and network information [201].”
Detection and Resolution of Rumours in Social Media
Zubiaga, A., Aker, A., Bontcheva, K., Liakata, M., & Procter, R. (2019) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3161603 · Cited by 608 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Before the term "fake news" became known among researchers, there was a large number of research on rumors and credibility of information [129, 248].”
BackgroundSemEval-2017 Task 8: RumourEval: Determining rumour veracity and support for rumours
Derczynski, L., Bontcheva, K., Liakata, M., Procter, R., Wong Sak Hoi, G., & Zubiaga, A. (2017) · Proceedings of the 11th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval-2017) · doi:10.18653/v1/s17-2006 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Disinformation on the Web: Impact, Characteristics, and Detection of Wikipedia Hoaxes
Kumar, S., West, R., & Leskovec, J. (2016) · Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on World Wide Web · doi:10.1145/2872427.2883085 · Cited by 310 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, to deceive people [122], to promote a biased agenda [223]), which is close to a narrow definition of fake news.”
False Information on Web and Social Media: A Survey
Kumar, S., & Shah, N. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1804.08559 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
TabFact: A Large-scale Dataset for Table-based Fact Verification
Chen, W., Wang, H., Chen, J., Zhang, Y., Wang, H., Li, S., Zhou, X., & Wang, W. Y. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.02164 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Credibility Assessment of Textual Claims on the Web
Popat, K., Mukherjee, S., Strötgen, J., & Weikum, G. (2016) · Proceedings of the 25th ACM International on Conference on Information and Knowledge Management · doi:10.1145/2983323.2983661 · Cited by 177 · see citing works
Rumor Diffusion and Convergence during the 3.11 Earthquake: A Twitter Case Study
Takayasu, M., Sato, K., Sano, Y., Yamada, K., Miura, W., & Takayasu, H. (2015) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0121443 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Hannak, A., Margolin, D., Keegan, B., & Weber, I. (2014) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v8i1.14555 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
The Web of False Information: Rumors, Fake News, Hoaxes, Clickbait, and Various Other Shenanigans
Zannettou, S., Sirivianos, M., Blackburn, J., & Kourtellis, N. (2019) · Journal of Data and Information Quality · doi:10.1145/3309699 · Cited by 86 · see citing works
BREAKING! Presenting Fake News Corpus for Automated Fact Checking
Pathak, A., & Srihari, R. (2019) · Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Student Research Workshop · doi:10.18653/v1/p19-2050 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fighting Fire with Fire: The Dual Role of LLMs in Crafting and Detecting Elusive Disinformation
Lucas, J., Uchendu, A., Yamashita, M., Lee, J., Rohatgi, S., & Lee, D. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.883 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
- Authors
- Murayama, T.
- Affiliations
- Nara Institute of Science and Technology (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Murayama, Taichi
- ORCID
- Murayama, Taichi
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2111.03299
- OpenAlex
- W3212788180
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
- Keywords
- fake news detection, fact-checking, fake news datasets, satire detection, misinformation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
