The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Quantifying the sustainability impact of Google Maps: A case study of Salt Lake City
Open accessAbstract
Google Maps uses current and historical traffic trends to provide routes to drivers. In this paper, we use microscopic traffic simulation to quantify the improvements to both travel time and CO$_2$ emissions from Google Maps real-time navigation. A case study in Salt Lake City shows that Google Maps users are, on average, saving 1.7% of CO$_2$ emissions and 6.5% travel time. If we restrict to the users for which Google Maps finds a different route than their original route, the average savings are 3.4% of CO$_2$ emissions and 12.5% of travel time. These results are based on traffic conditions observed during the Covid-19 pandemic. As congestion gradually builds back up to pre-pandemic levels, it is expected to lead to even greater savings in emissions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
AI-assisted navigation reduces emissions by an average of 3.4%, based on data gathered by Google on users of Google Maps.
“This contradicts research carried out on AI-assisted navigation specifically, which has been shown to reduce emissions by an average of 3.4%, based on data gathered by Google on users of Google Maps [8].”
From From Efficiency Gains to Rebound Effects: The Problem of Jevons' Paradox in AI's Polarized Environmental Debate (2025) · cites this paper as [8]
The Abstract (p. 1) reports 3.4% average CO2 savings only for users whom Google Maps routed differently from their original route; the average for all Google Maps users in the case study was 1.7%. The Approach Overview (p. 1) and Experimental Setup (p. 4) describe simulation-based emissions estimates informed and validated by Google user data, not emissions measured directly from users. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [11][11] N. Arora, Y. fan Chen, S. Ganapathy, Y. Li, Z. Lin, C. Osorio, A. Tomkins, and I. Tsogsuren. An Efficient Simulation-Based Travel Demand Calibration Algorithm for Large-Scale Metropolitan Traffic Models, 2021. URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.11392 . - · arXiv
- [13][13] P. A. Lopez, M. Behrisch, L. Bieker-Walz, J. Erdmann, Y.-P. Fl¨ otter¨ od, R. Hilbrich, L. L¨ ucken, J. Rummel, P. Wagner, and E. Wießner. Microscopic traffic simulation using SUMO. In 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) , pages 2575-2582. IEEE, 2018. -
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Luccioni, A. S., Strubell, E., & Crawford, K. (2025) · Proceedings of the 2025 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732007 · Cited by 71
Metadata
- Authors
- Arora, N., Cabannes, T., Ganapathy, S., Li, Y., McAfee, P., Nunkesser, M., Osorio, C., Tomkins, A., & Tsogsuren, I.
- Affiliations
- Google (United States) (US)
- HEC Montréal (CA)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2111.03426
- OpenAlex
- W3211236434
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle emissions and performance
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
- Keywords
- Google Maps, route optimization, real-time navigation, travel time savings, CO2 emissions, microscopic traffic simulation, traffic congestion, sustainability impacts, Salt Lake City
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
