PreprintCited by 38Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Improving Deep Learning Interpretability by Saliency Guided Training

Open access

Abstract

Saliency methods have been widely used to highlight important input features in model predictions. Most existing methods use backpropagation on a modified gradient function to generate saliency maps. Thus, noisy gradients can result in unfaithful feature attributions. In this paper, we tackle this issue and introduce a {\it saliency guided training}procedure for neural networks to reduce noisy gradients used in predictions while retaining the predictive performance of the model. Our saliency guided training procedure iteratively masks features with small and potentially noisy gradients while maximizing the similarity of model outputs for both masked and unmasked inputs. We apply the saliency guided training procedure to various synthetic and real data sets from computer vision, natural language processing, and time series across diverse neural architectures, including Recurrent Neural Networks, Convolutional Networks, and Transformers. Through qualitative and quantitative evaluations, we show that saliency guided training procedure significantly improves model interpretability across various domains while preserving its predictive performance.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2111.14338

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ismail et al. proposed a new training procedure called saliency-guided training that presents outputs that are less noisy and clear and do not degrade the model's performance.

    “To improve the accuracy of saliency maps, Ismail et al. [165] take a different approach by proposing a new training procedure called saliency-guided training.This procedure presents outputs that are less noisy and clear and do not degrade the model's performance.”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ismail, A. A., Bravo, H. C., & Feizi, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Genentech (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2021
Volume
34
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3213180370
Cited by
38
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 13 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
  • neural information processing systems
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
model interpretability, feature attribution, noisy gradients, saliency maps, feature masking, gradient-based explanation, neural network training, recurrent neural networks, transformer models, convolutional neural networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review