The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Learning to Repair: Repairing model output errors after deployment using a dynamic memory of feedback
Open accessAbstract
Large language models (LMs), while powerful, are not immune to mistakes, but can be difficult to retrain. Our goal is for an LM to continue to improve after deployment, without retraining, using feedback from the user. Our approach pairs an LM with (i) a growing memory of cases where the user identified an output error and provided general feedback on how to correct it (ii) a corrector model, trained to translate this general feedback into specific edits to repair the model output. Given a new, unseen input, our model can then use feedback from similar, past cases to repair output errors that may occur. We instantiate our approach using an existing, fixed model for script generation, that takes a goal (e.g., "bake a cake") and generates a partially ordered sequence of actions to achieve that goal, sometimes containing errors. Our memory-enhanced system, FBNet, learns to apply user feedback to repair such errors (up to 30 points improvement), while making a start at avoiding similar past mistakes on new, unseen examples (up to 7 points improvement in a controlled setting). This is a first step towards strengthening deployed models, potentially broadening their utility. Our code and data is available at https://github.com/allenai/interscript/.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Tandon et al. (2021) enables LLM's to improve their output after deployment without retraining, by leveraging user feedback.”
From The AI Hippocampus: How Far are We From Human Memory? (2026) · cites this paper as Tandon et al., 2021
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- Emily M. Bender and Alexander Koller. 2020. Climbing towards NLU: On meaning, form, and understanding in the age of data. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Lin- guistics, pages 5185-5198, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Rishi Bommasani, Drew A Hudson, Ehsan Adeli, Russ Altman, Simran Arora, Sydney von Arx, Michael S Bernstein, Jeannette Bohg, Antoine Bosse- lut, Emma Brunskill, et al. 2021. On the opportuni- ties and risks of foundation models. ArXiv preprint, abs/2108.07258. · arXiv
- Sanjoy Dasgupta, Daniel Hsu, Stefanos Poulis, and Xi- aojin Zhu. 2019. Teaching a black-box learner. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2019, 9-15 June 2019, Long Beach, California, USA, volume 97 of Pro- ceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 1547- 1555. PMLR. · DOI
- Ahmed Elgohary, Christopher Meek, Matthew Richardson, Adam Fourney, Gonzalo Ramos, and Ahmed Hassan Awadallah. 2021. NL-EDIT: Correcting semantic parse errors through natural language interaction. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 5599-5610, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Sebastian Gehrmann, Tosin Adewumi, Karmanya Aggarwal, Pawan Sasanka Ammanamanchi, Anuoluwapo Aremu, Antoine Bosselut, Khy- athi Raghavi Chandu, Miruna-Adriana Clinciu, Dipanjan Das, Kaustubh Dhole, Wanyu Du, Esin Durmus, Ondřej Dušek, Chris Chinenye Emezue, Varun Gangal, Cristina Garbacea, Tatsunori Hashimoto, Yufang Hou, Yacine Jernite, Harsh Jham- tani, Yangfeng Ji, Shailza Jolly, Mihir Kale, Dhruv Kumar, Faisal Ladhak, Aman Madaan, Mounica Maddela, Khyati Mahajan, Saad Mahamood, Bod- hisattwa Prasad Majumder, Pedro Henrique Martins, Angelina McMillan-Major, Simon Mille, Emiel van Miltenburg, Moin Nadeem, Shashi Narayan, Vitaly Nikolaev, Andre Niyongabo Rubungo, Salomey Osei, Ankur Parikh, Laura Perez-Beltrachini, Niranjan Ramesh Rao, Vikas Raunak, Juan Diego Rodriguez, Sashank Santhanam, João Sedoc, Thibault Sellam, Samira Shaikh, Anastasia Shimo- rina, Marco Antonio Sobrevilla Cabezudo, Hendrik Strobelt, Nishant Subramani, Wei Xu, Diyi Yang, Akhila Yerukola, and Jiawei Zhou. 2021. The GEM benchmark: Natural language generation, its evaluation and metrics. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Natural Language Generation, Evaluation, and Metrics (GEM 2021), pages 96-120, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI
- Kelvin Guu, Kenton Lee, Z. Tung, Panupong Pasu- pat, and Ming-Wei Chang. 2020. Realm: Retrieval- augmented language model pre-training. ArXiv, abs/2002.08909. · DOI
- K. Hammond. 1986. Chef: A model of case-based planning. In AAAI.
- Patrick S. H. Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Pik- tus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Heinrich Küttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rocktäschel, Sebastian Riedel, and Douwe Kiela. 2020. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks. In Advances in Neu- ral Information Processing Systems 33: Annual Con- ference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2020, NeurIPS 2020, December 6-12, 2020, virtual. · DOI
- Chin-Yew Lin. 2004. ROUGE: A package for auto- matic evaluation of summaries. In Text Summariza- tion Branches Out, pages 74-81, Barcelona, Spain. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Nikhil Mehta and Dan Goldwasser. 2019. Improving natural language interaction with robots using advice. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computa- tional Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 1962-1967, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Association for Computa- tional Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
- Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei- Jing Zhu. 2002. Bleu: a method for automatic evalu- ation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Compu- tational Linguistics, pages 311-318, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. Association for Computational Linguistics. · DOI · Paper page
- Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2019. Sentence- BERT: Sentence embeddings using Siamese BERT- networks. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natu- ral Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP), pages 3982-3992, Hong Kong, China. Association for Com- putational Linguistics.
- C. Riesbeck. 1981. Failure-driven reminding for incre- mental learning. In IJCAI.
- R. Schank and David B. Leake. 1989. Creativity and learning in a case-based explainer. Artif. Intell., 40:353-385. · DOI
- Alon Talmor, Jonathan Herzig, Nicholas Lourie, and Jonathan Berant. 2019. CommonsenseQA: A ques- tion answering challenge targeting commonsense knowledge. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Tech- nologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 4149-4158, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Alon Talmor, Oyvind Tafjord, P. Clark, Y. Goldberg, and Jonathan Berant. 2020. Teaching pre-trained mod- els to systematically reason over implicit knowledge. NeurIPS.
- Alex Wang, Amanpreet Singh, Julian Michael, Felix Hill, Omer Levy, and Samuel R. Bowman. 2019. GLUE: A multi-task benchmark and analysis plat- form for natural language understanding. In 7th In- ternational Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA, May 6-9, 2019. OpenReview.net.
- Sida I. Wang, Percy Liang, and Christopher D. Manning. 2016. Learning language games through interaction. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 2368-2378, Berlin, Germany. Association for Computational Linguistics.
- Sarah Wiegreffe and Ana Marasović. 2021. Teach me to explain: A review of datasets for explainable nlp. ArXiv, abs/2102.12060. · arXiv
- Michihiro Yasunaga and Percy Liang. 2020. Graph- based, self-supervised program repair from diag- nostic feedback. In Proceedings of the 37th Inter- national Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2020, 13-18 July 2020, Virtual Event, volume 119 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 10799-10808. PMLR.
- Michihiro Yasunaga and Percy Liang. 2021. Break- it-fix-it: Unsupervised learning for program repair. In Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2021, 18-24 July 2021, Virtual Event, volume 139 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 11941-11952. · DOI
- PMLR.
- Luke Zettlemoyer and Michael Collins. 2005. Learning to map sentences to logical form: Structured classi- fication with probabilistic categorial grammars. In UAI.
- Yi Zhang, Sujay Kumar Jauhar, Julia Kiseleva, Ryen White, and Dan Roth. 2021. Learning to decom- pose and organize complex tasks. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chap- ter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, pages 2726-2735, Online. Association for Computational Linguistics. x fb y e * y 1. ... 2. set alarm for early morning 3. get out of bed 4. prepare for yoga 5. go to the bathroom 6. do yoga 7. do yoga in the morning People don't leave their alarms ring- ing all day. insert node 'wake up and turn off alarm' before 'get out of bed' 1. ... 2. set alarm for early morning 3. wake up and turn off alarm 4. get out of bed 5. ... 6. ... 7. ...
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The AI Hippocampus: How Far are We From Human Memory?
Jia, Z., Li, J., Kang, Y., Wang, Y., Wu, T., Wang, Q., Wang, X., Zhang, S., Shen, J., Li, Q., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.09113
Metadata
- Authors
- Tandon, N., Madaan, A., Clark, P., & Yang, Y.
- Affiliations
- Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- Pages
- 339-352
- arXiv
- 2112.09737
- OpenAlex
- W4287887895
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 2.63
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: NAACL (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Air Force Research Laboratory (FA8750-19-2-0200)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
- Keywords
- large language models, user feedback, script generation, action sequences
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
