Nonperturbative gravity corrections to bulk reconstruction
Open accessAbstract
We introduce a new algebraic framework for understanding nonperturbative gravitational aspects of bulk reconstruction with a finite or infinite-dimensional boundary Hilbert space. We use relative entropy equivalence between bulk and boundary with an inclusion of nonperturbative gravitational errors, which give rise to approximate recovery. We utilize the privacy/correctability correspondence to prove that the reconstruction wedge, the intersection of all entanglement wedges in pure and mixed states, manifestly satisfies bulk reconstruction. We explicitly demonstrate that local operators in the reconstruction wedge of a given boundary region can be recovered in a state-independent way for arbitrarily large code subspaces, up to nonperturbative errors in $G_N$. We further discuss state-dependent recovery beyond the reconstruction wedge and the use of the twirled Petz map as a universal recovery channel. We discuss our setup in the context of quantum islands and the information paradox.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Non-perturbative gravity corrections imply only an approximate recovery of the entanglement wedge is possible (with exponentially small errors and even in absence of horizons).
“Non-perturbative gravity corrections imply only an approximate recovery of the entanglement wedge is possible (with exponentially small errors and even in absence of horizons) and the generalization of the present discussion can be found in [179].”
From Holographic spacetime, black holes and quantum error correcting codes: a review (2022) · cites this paper as [179]
The Introduction (p. 5) and Discussion (p. 25) support approximate recovery with nonperturbative gravitational errors, but specify state-independent recovery for the reconstruction wedge—the intersection of entanglement wedges—rather than every entanglement wedge. The passages found do not establish an exponentially small error bound or explicitly say the result holds in the absence of horizons. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 46 · Cited by 6
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- [5][5] Anantharaman C and Popa S An introduction to II 1 factors Preprint Book (available at: www.math. ucla.edu/popa/Books/IIun.pdf) -
- [22][22] Haag R 1992 Local Quantum Physics (Springer) -
- [26][26] Harlow D 2008 TASI lectures on the emergence of bulk physics in AdS/CFT Proc. Sci. 305 002 -
- [40][40] Ohya M and Petz D 2004 Quantum Entropy and its Use (Springer Science & Business Media) -
- [49][49] Stinespring W F 1955 Positive functions on C ∗ -algebras Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 6 211-16 -
- [51][51] Takesaki M 1970 Tomita's Theory of Modular Hilbert Algebras and its Application (Springer) -
- Authors
- Gesteau, E., & Kang, M. J.
- Affiliations
- California Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kang, Monica Jinwoo
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2021
- Volume
- 56
- Issue
- 38
- Pages
- 385401-385401
- ISSN
- 1751-8113 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2112.12789
- OpenAlex
- W4226164625
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 46
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 0.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Energy
- Sherman Fairchild Foundation
- National Research Foundation
- National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF-2020R1A4A3079707, 2020R1A4A3079707, 2020R1C1C1007591, NRF-2020R1C1C1007591)
- Office of Science
- High Energy Physics (DE-SC0011632)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Black Holes and Theoretical Physics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
- Keywords
- bulk reconstruction, entanglement wedge, Kullback-Leibler divergence, quantum error correction, black hole information paradox, AdS/CFT correspondence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
