CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 5Advanced Text Analysis TechniquesTopic ModelingAcademic Writing and Publishing

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Automatic Related Work Generation: A Meta Study

Open access
Li, Xiangci, Ouyang, Jessica·2022·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2201.01880arXiv 2201.01880
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Academic research is an exploration activity to solve problems that have never been resolved before. By this nature, each academic research work is required to perform a literature review to distinguish its novelties that have not been addressed by prior works. In natural language processing, this literature review is usually conducted under the "Related Work" section. The task of automatic related work generation aims to automatically generate the "Related Work" section given the rest of the research paper and a list of cited papers. Although this task was proposed over 10 years ago, it received little attention until very recently, when it was cast as a variant of the scientific multi-document summarization problem. However, even today, the problems of automatic related work and citation text generation are not yet standardized. In this survey, we conduct a meta-study to compare the existing literature on related work generation from the perspectives of problem formulation, dataset collection, methodological approach, performance evaluation, and future prospects to provide the reader insight into the progress of the state-of-the-art studies, as well as and how future studies can be conducted. We also survey relevant fields of study that we suggest future work to consider integrating.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2201.01880

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 110

  1. [1][1] Ahmed AbuRa'ed, Horacio Saggion, and Luis Chiruzzo. 2020. A Multi-level Annotated Corpus of Scientific Papers for Scientific Document Summarization and Cross-document Relation Discovery. In Proceedings of the 12th Language Resources and Evaluation Conference . European Language Resources Association, Marseille, France, 6672-6679. https://aclanthology.org/2020.lrec-1.824 -
  2. [2][2] Ahmed AbuRa'ed, Horacio Saggion, Alexander Shvets, and Alex Bravo. 2020. Automatic related work section generation: experiments in scientific document abstracting. Scientometrics 125, 3 (2020), 3159-3185. -
  3. [3][3] Nitin Agarwal, Ravi Shankar Reddy, GVR Kiran, and Carolyn Rose. 2011. SciSumm: a multi-document summarization system for scientific articles. In Proceedings of the ACL-HLT 2011 System Demonstrations . 115-120. -
  4. [4][4] Uchenna Akujuobi and Xiangliang Zhang. 2017. Delve: a dataset-driven scholarly search and analysis system. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter 19, 2 (2017), 36-46. -
  5. [5][5] Nouf Ibrahim Altmami and Mohamed El Bachir Menai. 2020. Automatic summarization of scientific articles: A survey. Journal of King Saud University-Computer and Information Sciences (2020). -
  6. [6][6] Waleed Ammar, Dirk Groeneveld, Chandra Bhagavatula, Iz Beltagy, Miles Crawford, Doug Downey, Jason Dunkelberger, Ahmed Elgohary, Sergey Feldman, Vu Ha, et al. 2018. Construction of the literature graph in semantic scholar. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.02262 (2018). - · arXiv
  7. [7][7] Awais Athar. 2011. Sentiment analysis of citations using sentence structure-based features. In Proceedings of the ACL 2011 student session . 81-87. -
  8. [8][8] Awais Athar and Simone Teufel. 2012. Context-Enhanced Citation Sentiment Detection. In Proceedings of the 2012 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies . Association for Computational Linguistics, Montréal, Canada, 597-601. https://aclanthology.org/N12-1073 -
  9. [9][9] Christos Baziotis, Ion Androutsopoulos, Ioannis Konstas, and Alexandros Potamianos. 2019. SEQˆ 3: Differentiable Sequence-to-Sequence-to-Sequence Autoencoder for Unsupervised Abstractive Sentence Compression. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.03651 (2019). - · arXiv
  10. [10][10] Iz Beltagy, Arman Cohan, and Kyle Lo. 2019. Scibert: Pretrained contextualized embeddings for scientific text. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.10676 (2019). - · arXiv
  11. [11][11] Iz Beltagy, Matthew E. Peters, and Arman Cohan. 2020. Longformer: The Long-Document Transformer. arXiv:2004.05150 (2020). - · arXiv
  12. [12][12] Steven Bird, Robert Dale, Bonnie J Dorr, Bryan Gibson, Mark Thomas Joseph, Min-Yen Kan, Dongwon Lee, Brett Powley, Dragomir R Radev, and Yee Fan Tan. 2008. The ACL anthology reference corpus: A reference dataset for bibliographic research in computational linguistics. (2008). -
  13. [14][14] Gully A Burns, Pradeep Dasigi, and Eduard H Hovy. 2017. Extracting Evidence Fragments for Distant Supervision of Molecular Interactions. BioRxiv (2017), 192856. -
  14. [16][16] Rich Caruana. 1997. Multitask learning. Machine learning 28, 1 (1997), 41-75. -
  15. [17][17] Jingqiang Chen and Hai Zhuge. 2019. Automatic generation of related work through summarizing citations. Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience 31, 3 (2019), e4261. -
  16. [18][18] Xiuying Chen, Hind Alamro, Mingzhe Li, Shen Gao, Xiangliang Zhang, Dongyan Zhao, and Rui Yan. 2021. Capturing Relations between Scientific Papers: An Abstractive Model for Related Work Section Generation. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) . Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 6068-6077. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.473 - · DOI
  17. [19][19] Xinchi Chen, Xipeng Qiu, and Xuanjing Huang. 2016. Neural sentence ordering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1607.06952 (2016). - · arXiv
  18. [20][20] Arman Cohan, Waleed Ammar, Madeleine Van Zuylen, and Field Cady. 2019. Structural scaffolds for citation intent classification in scientific publications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.01608 (2019). - · arXiv
  19. [21][21] Arman Cohan and Nazli Goharian. 2018. Scientific document summarization via citation contextualization and scientific discourse. International Journal on Digital Libraries 19, 2 (2018), 287-303. -
  20. [22][22] Corinna Cortes and Vladimir Vapnik. 1995. Support-vector networks. Machine learning 20, 3 (1995), 273-297. -
  21. [23][23] Pradeep Dasigi, Gully APC Burns, Eduard Hovy, and Anita de Waard. 2017. Experiment segmentation in scientific discourse as clause-level structured prediction using recurrent neural networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.05398 (2017). - · arXiv
  22. [24][24] Anita de Waard and Henk Pander Maat. 2012. Verb form indicates discourse segment type in biological research papers: Experimental evidence. Journal of English for academic purposes 11, 4 (2012), 357-366. -
  23. [26][26] Franck Dernoncourt and Ji Young Lee. 2017. PubMed 200k RCT: a Dataset for Sequential Sentence Classification in Medical Abstracts. CoRR abs/1710.06071 (2017). arXiv:1710.06071 http://arxiv.org/abs/1710.06071 - · arXiv
  24. [28][28] Cailing Dong and Ulrich Schäfer. 2011. Ensemble-style self-training on citation classification. In Proceedings of 5th international joint conference on natural language processing . 623-631. -
  25. [29][29] Mahmoud El-Haj, Udo Kruschwitz, and Chris Fox. 2011. Exploring clustering for multi-document Arabic summarisation. In Asia Information Retrieval Symposium . Springer, 550-561. -
  26. [30][30] Aaron Elkiss, Siwei Shen, Anthony Fader, Güneş Erkan, David States, and Dragomir Radev. 2008. Blind men and elephants: What do citation summaries tell us about a research article? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59, 1 (2008), 51-62. -
  27. [31][31] Shai Erera, Michal Shmueli-Scheuer, Guy Feigenblat, Ora Peled Nakash, Odellia Boni, Haggai Roitman, Doron Cohen, Bar Weiner, Yosi Mass, Or Rivlin, et al. 2019. A summarization system for scientific documents. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.11152 (2019). - · arXiv
  28. [32][32] Günes Erkan and Dragomir R Radev. 2004. Lexrank: Graph-based lexical centrality as salience in text summarization. Journal of artificial intelligence research 22 (2004), 457-479. -
  29. [33][33] Robert W Floyd. 1962. Algorithm 97: shortest path. Commun. ACM 5, 6 (1962), 345. -
  30. [35][35] Mahak Gambhir and Vishal Gupta. 2017. Recent automatic text summarization techniques: a survey. Artificial Intelligence Review 47, 1 (2017), 1-66. -
  31. [36][36] Eugene Garfield et al. 1965. Can citation indexing be automated. In Statistical association methods for mechanized documentation, symposium proceedings , Vol. 269. Washington, 189-192. -
  32. [37][37] Yubin Ge, Ly Dinh, Xiaofeng Liu, Jinsong Su, Ziyao Lu, Ante Wang, and Jana Diesner. 2021. BACO: A Background Knowledge- and Content-Based Framework for Citing Sentence Generation. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) . Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 1466-1478. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.116 - · DOI
  33. [38][38] Aria Haghighi and Lucy Vanderwende. 2009. Exploring content models for multi-document summarization. In Proceedings of human language technologies: The 2009 annual conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics . 362-370. -
  34. [39][39] Kenji Hirohata, Naoaki Okazaki, Sophia Ananiadou, and Mitsuru Ishizuka. 2008. Identifying sections in scientific abstracts using conditional random fields. In Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing: Volume-I . -
  35. [40][40] Cong Duy Vu Hoang and Min-Yen Kan. 2010. Towards Automated Related Work Summarization. In Coling 2010: Posters . Coling 2010 Organizing Committee, Beijing, China, 427-435. https://aclanthology.org/C10-2049 -
  36. [42][42] Sepp Hochreiter and Jürgen Schmidhuber. 1997. Long short-term memory. Neural computation 9, 8 (1997), 17351780. -
  37. [43][43] Thomas Hofmann. 1999. Probabilistic latent semantic indexing. In Proceedings of the 22nd annual international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval . 50-57. -
  38. [44][44] Yue Hu and Xiaojun Wan. 2014. Automatic generation of related work sections in scientific papers: an optimization approach. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) . 16241633. -
  39. [45][45] Ting-Hao'Kenneth' Huang, Chieh-Yang Huang, Chien-Kuang Cornelia Ding, Yen-Chia Hsu, and C Lee Giles. 2020. CODA-19: Reliably Annotating Research Aspects on 10,000+ CORD-19 Abstracts Using Non-Expert Crowd. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.02367 (2020). - · arXiv
  40. [46][46] Kokil Jaidka, Muthu Kumar Chandrasekaran, Sajal Rustagi, and Min-Yen Kan. 2018. Insights from CL-SciSumm 2016: the faceted scientific document summarization Shared Task. International Journal on Digital Libraries 19, 2 (2018), 163-171. -
  41. [47][47] Kokil Jaidka, Christopher Khoo, and Jin-Cheon Na. 2010. Imitating human literature review writing: An approach to multi-document summarization. In International Conference on Asian Digital Libraries . Springer, 116-119. -
  42. [48][48] Kokil Jaidka, Christopher Khoo, and Jin-Cheon Na. 2013. Deconstructing human literature reviews-a framework for multi-document summarization. In proceedings of the 14th European workshop on natural language generation . 125-135. -
  43. [49][49] Kokil Jaidka, Christopher SG Khoo, and Jin-Cheon Na. 2013. Literature review writing: how information is selected and transformed. In Aslib Proceedings . Emerald Group Publishing Limited. -
  44. [50][50] Kokil Jaidka, Michihiro Yasunaga, Muthu Kumar Chandrasekaran, Dragomir Radev, and Min-Yen Kan. 2019. The cl-scisumm shared task 2018: Results and key insights. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.00764 (2019). - · arXiv
  45. [51][51] Kokil Jaidka Jaidka, Christopher Khoo Khoo, and Jin-Cheon Na Na. 2011. Literature review writing: a study of information selection from cited papers/Kokil Jaidka, Christopher Khoo and Jin-Cheon Na. (2011). -
  46. [52][52] Hanqi Jin, Tianming Wang, and Xiaojun Wan. 2020. Multi-granularity interaction network for extractive and abstractive multi-document summarization. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics . 6244-6254. -
  47. [53][53] K Sparck Jones, Steve Walker, and Stephen E. Robertson. 2000. A probabilistic model of information retrieval: development and comparative experiments: Part 2. Information processing & management 36, 6 (2000), 809-840. -
  48. [54][54] David Jurgens, Srijan Kumar, Raine Hoover, Dan McFarland, and Dan Jurafsky. 2018. Measuring the evolution of a scientific field through citation frames. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 6 (2018), 391406. -
  49. [55][55] Masayu Leylia Khodral, Dwi Hendratmo Widyantorol, E Aminudin Aziz, and Bambang Riyanto Trilaksonol. 2012. Automatic Tailored Multi-Paper Summarization based on Rhetorical Document Profile and Summary Specification. Journal of ICT Research and Applications 6, 3 (2012), 220-239. -
  50. [56][56] Christopher SG Khoo, Jin-Cheon Na, and Kokil Jaidka. 2011. Analysis of the macro-level discourse structure of literature reviews. Online Information Review (2011). -
  51. [57][57] Guillaume Klein, Yoon Kim, Yuntian Deng, Jean Senellart, and Alexander M Rush. 2017. Opennmt: Open-source toolkit for neural machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.02810 (2017). - · arXiv
  52. [58][58] John Lafferty, Andrew McCallum, and Fernando CN Pereira. 2001. Conditional random fields: Probabilistic models for segmenting and labeling sequence data. In ICML . -
  53. [59][59] Anne Lauscher, Brandon Ko, Bailey Kuhl, Sophie Johnson, David Jurgens, Arman Cohan, and Kyle Lo. 2021. MultiCite: Modeling realistic citations requires moving beyond the single-sentence single-label setting. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.00414 (2021). - · arXiv
  54. [60][60] Yann LeCun, Yoshua Bengio, and Geoffrey Hinton. 2015. Deep learning. nature 521, 7553 (2015), 436-444. -
  55. [61][61] Mike Lewis, Yinhan Liu, Naman Goyal, Marjan Ghazvininejad, Abdelrahman Mohamed, Omer Levy, Ves Stoyanov, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2019. Bart: Denoising sequence-to-sequence pre-training for natural language generation, translation, and comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.13461 (2019). - · arXiv
  56. [62][62] Wei Li, Xinyan Xiao, Jiachen Liu, Hua Wu, Haifeng Wang, and Junping Du. 2020. Leveraging graph to improve abstractive multi-document summarization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.10043 (2020). - · arXiv
  57. [63][63] Xiangci Li, Gully Burns, and Nanyun Peng. 2021. Scientific Discourse Tagging for Evidence Extraction. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Main Volume . 25502562. -
  58. [64][64] Maria Liakata, Shyamasree Saha, Simon Dobnik, Colin Batchelor, and Dietrich Rebholz-Schuhmann. 2012. Automatic recognition of conceptualization zones in scientific articles and two life science applications. Bioinformatics 28, 7 (2012), 991-1000. -
  59. [65][65] Maria Liakata, Simone Teufel, Advaith Siddharthan, and Colin Batchelor. 2010. Corpora for the Conceptualisation and Zoning of Scientific Papers. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC'10) . European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Valletta, Malta. http://www.lrec-conf.org/proceedings/lrec2010/pdf/644\_Paper.pdf -
  60. [67][67] Ben-Ami Lipetz. 1965. Improvement of the selectivity of citation indexes to science literature through inclusion of citation relationship indicators. American documentation 16, 2 (1965), 81-90. -
  61. [68][68] Yang Liu and Mirella Lapata. 2019. Hierarchical transformers for multi-document summarization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.13164 (2019). - · arXiv
  62. [69][69] Yang Liu and Mirella Lapata. 2019. Text summarization with pretrained encoders. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.08345 (2019). - · arXiv
  63. [70][70] Yinhan Liu, Myle Ott, Naman Goyal, Jingfei Du, Mandar Joshi, Danqi Chen, Omer Levy, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, and Veselin Stoyanov. 2019. Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692 (2019). - · arXiv
  64. [71][71] Elena Lloret and Manuel Palomar. 2012. Text summarisation in progress: a literature review. Artificial Intelligence Review 37, 1 (2012), 1-41. -
  65. [72][72] Elena Lloret, María Teresa Romá-Ferri, and Manuel Palomar. 2013. COMPENDIUM: A text summarization system for generating abstracts of research papers. Data & Knowledge Engineering 88 (2013), 164-175. -
  66. [73][73] Kyle Lo, Lucy Lu Wang, Mark Neumann, Rodney Kinney, and Daniel Weld. 2020. S2ORC: The Semantic Scholar Open Research Corpus. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics . Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 4969-4983. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.447 - · DOI · Paper page
  67. [74][74] Jiasen Lu, Dhruv Batra, Devi Parikh, and Stefan Lee. 2019. Vilbert: Pretraining task-agnostic visiolinguistic representations for vision-and-language tasks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.02265 (2019). - · arXiv
  68. [75][75] Kelvin Luu, Xinyi Wu, Rik Koncel-Kedziorski, Kyle Lo, Isabel Cachola, and Noah A. Smith. 2021. Explaining Relationships Between Scientific Documents. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers) . Association for Computational Linguistics, Online, 2130-2144. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2021.acl-long.166 - · DOI
  69. [76][76] Christopher D Manning, Mihai Surdeanu, John Bauer, Jenny Rose Finkel, Steven Bethard, and David McClosky. 2014. The Stanford CoreNLP natural language processing toolkit. In Proceedings of 52nd annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics: system demonstrations . 55-60. -
  70. [77][77] Rada Mihalcea and Paul Tarau. 2004. Textrank: Bringing order into text. In Proceedings of the 2004 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing . 404-411. -
  71. [78][78] Saif Mohammad, Bonnie Dorr, Melissa Egan, Ahmed Hassan, Pradeep Muthukrishnan, Vahed Qazvinian, Dragomir Radev, and David Zajic. 2009. Using citations to generate surveys of scientific paradigms. In Proceedings of human language technologies: The 2009 annual conference of the North American chapter of the association for computational linguistics . 584-592. -
  72. [79][79] Michael J Moravcsik and Poovanalingam Murugesan. 1975. Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social studies of science 5, 1 (1975), 86-92. -
  73. [80][80] Ramesh Nallapati, Feifei Zhai, and Bowen Zhou. 2017. Summarunner: A recurrent neural network based sequence model for extractive summarization of documents. In Thirty-First AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence . -
  74. [82][82] Sandra Orchard, Mais Ammari, Bruno Aranda, Lionel Breuza, Leonardo Briganti, Fiona Broackes-Carter, Nancy H Campbell, Gayatri Chavali, Carol Chen, Noemi Del-Toro, et al. 2013. The MIntAct project-IntAct as a common curation platform for 11 molecular interaction databases. Nucleic acids research 42, D1 (2013), D358-D363. -
  75. [83][83] Jahna Otterbacher, Gunes Erkan, and Dragomir Radev. 2005. Using random walks for question-focused sentence retrieval. In Proceedings of human language technology conference and conference on empirical methods in natural language processing . 915-922. -
  76. [85][85] Kishore Papineni, Salim Roukos, Todd Ward, and Wei-Jing Zhu. 2002. Bleu: a method for automatic evaluation of machine translation. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics . 311-318. -
  77. [86][86] Jeffrey Pennington, Richard Socher, and Christopher Manning. 2014. Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP) . 1532-1543. -
  78. [87][87] MatthewEPeters, Mark Neumann, Mohit Iyyer, Matt Gardner, Christopher Clark, Kenton Lee, and Luke Zettlemoyer. 2018. Deep contextualized word representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.05365 (2018). - · arXiv
  79. [88][88] Maxime Peyrard and Judith Eckle-Kohler. 2016. A general optimization framework for multi-document summarization using genetic algorithms and swarm intelligence. In Proceedings of COLING 2016, the 26th International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Technical Papers . 247-257. -
  80. [89][89] Vahed Qazvinian, Dragomir Radev, and Arzucan Özgür. 2010. Citation summarization through keyphrase extraction. In Proceedings of the 23rd international conference on computational linguistics (COLING 2010) . 895-903. -
  81. [90][90] Vahed Qazvinian and Dragomir R. Radev. 2008. Scientific Paper Summarization Using Citation Summary Networks. In Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Computational Linguistics - Volume 1 (Manchester, United Kingdom) (COLING '08) . Association for Computational Linguistics, USA, 689-696. -
  82. [91][91] Vahed Qazvinian, Dragomir R Radev, Saif M Mohammad, Bonnie Dorr, David Zajic, Michael Whidby, and Taesun Moon. 2013. Generating extractive summaries of scientific paradigms. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 46 (2013), 165-201. -
  83. [92][92] Dragomir R Radev, Hongyan Jing, Małgorzata Styś, and Daniel Tam. 2004. Centroid-based summarization of multiple documents. Information Processing & Management 40, 6 (2004), 919-938. -
  84. [93][93] Dragomir R Radev, Pradeep Muthukrishnan, Vahed Qazvinian, and Amjad Abu-Jbara. 2013. The ACL anthology network corpus. Language Resources and Evaluation 47, 4 (2013), 919-944. -
  85. [94][94] Alec Radford, Jeffrey Wu, Rewon Child, David Luan, Dario Amodei, Ilya Sutskever, et al. 2019. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog 1, 8 (2019), 9. -
  86. [95][95] Colin Raffel, Noam Shazeer, Adam Roberts, Katherine Lee, Sharan Narang, Michael Matena, Yanqi Zhou, Wei Li, and Peter J. Liu. 2020. Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer. Journal of Machine Learning Research 21, 140 (2020), 1-67. http://jmlr.org/papers/v21/20-074.html -
  87. [96][96] Kumar Ravi, Srirangaraj Setlur, Vadlamani Ravi, and Venu Govindaraju. 2018. Article citation sentiment analysis using deep learning. In 2018 IEEE 17th International Conference on Cognitive Informatics & Cognitive Computing (ICCI* CC) . IEEE, 78-85. -
  88. [97][97] Horacio Saggion. 2008. A robust and adaptable summarization tool. Traitement Automatique des Langues 49, 2 (2008), 68. -
  89. [99][99] Abigail See, Peter J. Liu, and Christopher D. Manning. 2017. Get To The Point: Summarization with PointerGenerator Networks. In Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) . Association for Computational Linguistics, Vancouver, Canada, 1073-1083. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P17-1099 - · DOI · Paper page
  90. [100][100] Zhihong Shen, Hao Ma, and Kuansan Wang. 2018. A web-scale system for scientific knowledge exploration. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.12216 (2018). - · arXiv
  91. [101][101] Cepi Slamet, AR Atmadja, DS Maylawati, RS Lestari, Wahyudin Darmalaksana, and Muhammad Ali Ramdhani. 2018. Automated text summarization for indonesian article using vector space model. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering , Vol. 288. IOP Publishing, 012037. -
  92. [103][103] Weijie Su, Xizhou Zhu, Yue Cao, Bin Li, Lewei Lu, Furu Wei, and Jifeng Dai. 2019. Vl-bert: Pre-training of generic visual-linguistic representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.08530 (2019). - · arXiv
  93. [104][104] Zhiqing Sun, Hongkun Yu, Xiaodan Song, Renjie Liu, Yiming Yang, and Denny Zhou. 2020. Mobilebert: a compact task-agnostic bert for resource-limited devices. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.02984 (2020). - · arXiv
  94. [105][105] Jie Tang. 2016. AMiner: Toward understanding big scholar data. In Proceedings of the ninth ACM international conference on web search and data mining . 467-467. -
  95. [106][106] Simone Teufel et al. 1999. Argumentative zoning: Information extraction from scientific text . Ph.D. Dissertation. Citeseer. -
  96. [108][108] Simone Teufel and Marc Moens. 2002. Summarizing scientific articles: experiments with relevance and rhetorical status. Computational linguistics 28, 4 (2002), 409-445. -
  97. [109][109] Simone Teufel, Advaith Siddharthan, and Dan Tidhar. 2006. Automatic classification of citation function. In Proceedings of the 2006 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing . 103-110. -
  98. [110][110] Suppawong Tuarob, Sung Woo Kang, Poom Wettayakorn, Chanatip Pornprasit, Tanakitti Sachati, Saeed-Ul Hassan, and Peter Haddawy. 2019. Automatic classification of algorithm citation functions in scientific literature. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 32, 10 (2019), 1881-1896. -
  99. [111][111] Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. In Advances in neural information processing systems . 5998-6008. -
  100. [112][112] Petar Velickovic, Guillem Cucurull, Arantxa Casanova, Adriana Romero, Pietro Lio', and Yoshua Bengio. 2018. Graph Attention Networks. ArXiv abs/1710.10903 (2018). - · arXiv
  101. [113][113] Pancheng Wang, Shasha Li, Haifang Zhou, Jintao Tang, and Ting Wang. 2019. ToC-RWG: Explore the Combination of Topic Model and Citation Information for Automatic Related Work Generation. IEEE Access 8 (2019), 13043-13055. -
  102. [114][114] Mark Wasson. 1998. Using leading text for news summaries: Evaluation results and implications for commercial summarization applications. In 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Volume 2 . 1364-1368. -
  103. [115][115] Ian H Witten, Eibe Frank, Mark A Hall, CJ Pal, and MINING DATA. 2005. Practical machine learning tools and techniques. In DATA MINING , Vol. 2. 4. -
  104. [116][116] Te-Lin Wu, Shikhar Singh, Sayan Paul, Gully Burns, and Nanyun Peng. 2020. MELINDA: A Multimodal Dataset for Biomedical Experiment Method Classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.09216 (2020). - · arXiv
  105. [117][117] Xinyu Xing, Xiaosheng Fan, and Xiaojun Wan. 2020. Automatic generation of citation texts in scholarly papers: A pilot study. In Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics . 6181-6190. -
  106. [118][118] Shansong Yang, Weiming Lu, Zhanjiang Zhang, Baogang Wei, and Wenjia An. 2016. Amplifying scientific paper's abstract by leveraging data-weighted reconstruction. Information Processing & Management 52, 4 (2016), 698-719. -
  107. [119][119] Michihiro Yasunaga, Jungo Kasai, Rui Zhang, Alexander R Fabbri, Irene Li, Dan Friedman, and Dragomir R Radev. 2019. Scisummnet: A large annotated corpus and content-impact models for scientific paper summarization with citation networks. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , Vol. 33. 7386-7393. -
  108. [120][120] Michihiro Yasunaga, Rui Zhang, Kshitijh Meelu, Ayush Pareek, Krishnan Srinivasan, and Dragomir Radev. 2017. Graph-based Neural Multi-Document Summarization. In Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning (CoNLL 2017) . 452-462. -
  109. [121][121] He Zhao, Zhunchen Luo, Chong Feng, Anqing Zheng, and Xiaopeng Liu. 2019. A Context-based Framework for Modeling the Role and Function of On-line Resource Citations in Scientific Literature. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) . 5206-5215. -
  110. [122][122] Xiaojin Zhu and Andrew B Goldberg. 2009. Introduction to semi-supervised learning. Synthesis lectures on artificial intelligence and machine learning 3, 1 (2009), 1-130.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 5

Metadata

Authors
Li, X., & Ouyang, J.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Dallas (US)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2201.01880
arXiv
2201.01880
OpenAlex
W4226263105
Cited by
5
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Text Analysis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Writing and Publishing
Keywords
problem formulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review