Grokking: Generalization Beyond Overfitting on Small Algorithmic Datasets
Open accessAbstract
In this paper we propose to study generalization of neural networks on small algorithmically generated datasets. In this setting, questions about data efficiency, memorization, generalization, and speed of learning can be studied in great detail. In some situations we show that neural networks learn through a process of "grokking" a pattern in the data, improving generalization performance from random chance level to perfect generalization, and that this improvement in generalization can happen well past the point of overfitting. We also study generalization as a function of dataset size and find that smaller datasets require increasing amounts of optimization for generalization. We argue that these datasets provide a fertile ground for studying a poorly understood aspect of deep learning: generalization of overparametrized neural networks beyond memorization of the finite training dataset.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The multiple-choice format tends to improve performance for large models, while decreasing the performance of small models, leading to the appearance of a 'grok' curve.
“We find that this format tends to improve performance for large models, while decreasing the performance of small models, leading to the arguably misleading appearance of a 'grok' [Power et al., 2022] curve.”
From Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (2022) · cites this paper as Power et al., 2022
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Training a Helpful and Harmless Assistant with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
Bai, Y., Jones, A., Ndousse, K., Askell, A., Chen, A., DasSarma, N., Drain, D., Fort, S., Ganguli, D., Henighan, T., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2204.05862 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Evaluating Large Language Models in Generating Synthetic HCI Research Data: a Case Study
Hämäläinen, P., Tavast, M., & Kunnari, A. (2023) · Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3544548.3580688 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Predictability and Surprise in Large Generative Models
Ganguli, D., Hernandez, D., Lovitt, L., Askell, A., Bai, Y., Chen, A., Conerly, T., Dassarma, N., Drain, D., Elhage, N., et al. (2022) · 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness Accountability and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3531146.3533229 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
Faith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionality
Dziri, N., Lu, X., Sclar, M., Li, X. (., Jiang, L., Lin, B. Y., Welleck, S., West, P., Bhagavatula, C., Bras, R. L., et al. (2023) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 36 · doi:10.52202/075280-3081 · Cited by 124 · see citing works
“We explore whether extended training beyond overfitting leads to improved generalization abilities, a phenomenon known as grokking [59, 53].”
BackgroundFaith and Fate: Limits of Transformers on Compositionality
Dziri, N., Lu, X., Sclar, M., Li, X. L., Jiang, L., Lin, B. Y., West, P., Bhagavatula, C., Bras, R. L., Hwang, J. D., et al. (2023) · arXiv · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Organizing memories for generalization in complementary learning systems
Sun, W., Advani, M., Spruston, N., Saxe, A., & Fitzgerald, J. E. (2023) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41593-023-01382-9 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Training large language models on narrow tasks can lead to broad misalignment
Betley, J., Warncke, N., Sztyber-Betley, A., Tan, D., Bao, X., Soto, M., Srivastava, M., Labenz, N., & Evans, O. (2026) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-09937-5 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
The clock and the pizza: Two stories in mechanistic explanation of neural networks
Zhong, Z., Liu, Z., Tegmark, M., & Andreas, J. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.17844 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Multi-Agent Risks from Advanced AI
Hammond, L., Chan, A., Clifton, J., Hoelscher-Obermaier, J., Khan, A., McLean, E., Smith, C., Barfuss, W., Foerster, J., Gavenčiak, T., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.14143 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Bigger is not always better: The importance of human-scale language modeling for psycholinguistics
Wilcox, E. G., Hu, M. Y., Mueller, A., Warstadt, A., Choshen, L., Zhuang, C., Williams, A., Cotterell, R., & Linzen, T. (2025) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2025.104650 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Zoology: Measuring and Improving Recall in Efficient Language Models
Arora, S., Eyuboglu, S., Timalsina, A., Johnson, I., Poli, M., Zou, J., Rudra, A., & Ré, C. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.04927 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Ai, Q., Zhan, J., & Liu, Y. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.02842
“Additionally, Power et al. [31] introduced the concept of “grokking” to explain emergence, showing that models might suddenly exhibit strong generalization capabilities when provided with sufficient computational resources.”
- Authors
- Power, A., Burda, Y., Edwards, H., Babuschkin, I., & Misra, V.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2201.02177
- OpenAlex
- W4226434736
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 14
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Neural Networks and Applications
- Keywords
- grokking, generalization, overfitting, small datasets, memorization, overparametrized neural networks, data efficiency, learning speed, dataset size
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
