PreprintCited by 108Gait Recognition and AnalysisBiometric Identification and SecurityHuman Pose and Action Recognition

The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Gait Recognition Based on Deep Learning: A Survey

Open access

Abstract

In general, biometry-based control systems may not rely on individual expected behavior or cooperation to operate appropriately. Instead, such systems should be aware of malicious procedures for unauthorized access attempts. Some works available in the literature suggest addressing the problem through gait recognition approaches. Such methods aim at identifying human beings through intrinsic perceptible features, despite dressed clothes or accessories. Although the issue denotes a relatively long-time challenge, most of the techniques developed to handle the problem present several drawbacks related to feature extraction and low classification rates, among other issues. However, deep learning-based approaches recently emerged as a robust set of tools to deal with virtually any image and computer-vision related problem, providing paramount results for gait recognition as well. Therefore, this work provides a surveyed compilation of recent works regarding biometric detection through gait recognition with a focus on deep learning approaches, emphasizing their benefits, and exposing their weaknesses. Besides, it also presents categorized and characterized descriptions of the datasets, approaches, and architectures employed to tackle associated constraints.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2201.03323

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 137 · Cited by 108

Metadata

Authors
Santos, C. F. G. D., Oliveira, D. D. S., Passos, L. A., Pires, R. G., Santos, D. F. S., Valem, L. P., Moreira, T. P., Santana, M. C. S., Roder, M., Papa, J. P., & Colombo, D.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
  • Petrobras (Brazil) (BR)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
1-34
ISSN
0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4205268692
Cited by
108
References
137
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 11
FWCI
7.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ACM Computing Surveys (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2020/12101-0, 2013/07375-, 13/07375-0, 2014/, 307066/2017-7, 427968/2018-6, 2013/073750, 2014/12236- 1)
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (307066/2017 — 7, 427968∕2018-6, 2020/12101-0, 2013/07375-0, 2014/12236-1, #307066/2017-7 and #427968/2018-6)
  • Petrobras (2017/ 00285-6)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
Keywords
gait recognition, deep learning, biometric identification, unauthorized access detection, feature extraction, gait dataset, gait classification, wearable accessories

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review