The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Gait Recognition Based on Deep Learning: A Survey
Open accessAbstract
In general, biometry-based control systems may not rely on individual expected behavior or cooperation to operate appropriately. Instead, such systems should be aware of malicious procedures for unauthorized access attempts. Some works available in the literature suggest addressing the problem through gait recognition approaches. Such methods aim at identifying human beings through intrinsic perceptible features, despite dressed clothes or accessories. Although the issue denotes a relatively long-time challenge, most of the techniques developed to handle the problem present several drawbacks related to feature extraction and low classification rates, among other issues. However, deep learning-based approaches recently emerged as a robust set of tools to deal with virtually any image and computer-vision related problem, providing paramount results for gait recognition as well. Therefore, this work provides a surveyed compilation of recent works regarding biometric detection through gait recognition with a focus on deep learning approaches, emphasizing their benefits, and exposing their weaknesses. Besides, it also presents categorized and characterized descriptions of the datasets, approaches, and architectures employed to tackle associated constraints.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 137 · Cited by 108
Metadata
- Authors
- Santos, C. F. G. D., Oliveira, D. D. S., Passos, L. A., Pires, R. G., Santos, D. F. S., Valem, L. P., Moreira, T. P., Santana, M. C. S., Roder, M., Papa, J. P., & Colombo, D.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
- Petrobras (Brazil) (BR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 1-34
- ISSN
- 0360-0300 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2201.03323
- OpenAlex
- W4205268692
- Cited by
- 108
- References
- 137
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 11
- FWCI
- 7.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- ACM Computing Surveys (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2020/12101-0, 2013/07375-, 13/07375-0, 2014/, 307066/2017-7, 427968/2018-6, 2013/073750, 2014/12236- 1)
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (307066/2017 — 7, 427968∕2018-6, 2020/12101-0, 2013/07375-0, 2014/12236-1, #307066/2017-7 and #427968/2018-6)
- Petrobras (2017/ 00285-6)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
- Keywords
- gait recognition, deep learning, biometric identification, unauthorized access detection, feature extraction, gait dataset, gait classification, wearable accessories
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review