A ConvNet for the 2020s
Open accessAbstract
The "Roaring 20s" of visual recognition began with the introduction of Vision Transformers (ViTs), which quickly superseded ConvNets as the state-of-the-art image classification model. A vanilla ViT, on the other hand, faces difficulties when applied to general computer vision tasks such as object detection and semantic segmentation. It is the hierarchical Transformers (e.g., Swin Transformers) that reintroduced several ConvNet priors, making Transformers practically viable as a generic vision backbone and demonstrating remarkable performance on a wide variety of vision tasks. However, the effectiveness of such hybrid approaches is still largely credited to the intrinsic superiority of Transformers, rather than the inherent inductive biases of convolutions. In this work, we reexamine the design spaces and test the limits of what a pure ConvNet can achieve. We gradually "modernize" a standard ResNet toward the design of a vision Transformer, and discover several key components that contribute to the performance difference along the way. The outcome of this exploration is a family of pure ConvNet models dubbed ConvNeXt. Constructed entirely from standard ConvNet modules, ConvNeXts compete favorably with Transformers in terms of accuracy and scalability, achieving 87.8% ImageNet top-1 accuracy and outperforming Swin Transformers on COCO detection and ADE20K segmentation, while maintaining the simplicity and efficiency of standard ConvNets.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
MultiMAE: Multi-modal Multi-task Masked Autoencoders
Bachmann, R., Mizrahi, D., Atanov, A., & Zamir, A. (2022) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19836-6_20 · Cited by 268 · see citing works
Li, W., & Hsu, C.-Y. (2022) · ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information · doi:10.3390/ijgi11070385 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Estébanez-Camarena, M., Taormina, R., van de Giesen, N., & ten Veldhuis, M.-C. (2023) · Remote Sensing · doi:10.3390/rs15071922 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Scaling Laws for Galaxy Images
Walmsley, M., Bowles, M., Scaife, A. M. M., Makechemu, J. S., Gordon, A. J., Ferguson, A. M. N., Mann, R. G., Pearson, J., Popp, J. J., Bovy, J., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.02973 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Atamna, M., Tkachenko, I., & Miguet, S. (2025) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-88223-4_16 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Liu, Z., Mao, H., Wu, C.-Y., Feichtenhofer, C., Darrell, T., & Xie, S.
- Affiliations
- Meta (United States) (US)
- University of California, Berkeley (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- Pages
- 11966-11976
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2201.03545
- OpenAlex
- W4312443924
- Cited by
- 8,924
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2447 · 2025: 2702 · 2024: 2069 · 2023: 1421 · 2022: 283 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 572.31
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings - IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition/Proceedings (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
- Keywords
- ConvNeXt, vision transformer, ResNet, image classification, object detection, semantic segmentation, Swin Transformer, model design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review