Federated Unlearning with Knowledge Distillation
Open accessAbstract
Federated Learning (FL) is designed to protect the data privacy of each client during the training process by transmitting only models instead of the original data. However, the trained model may memorize certain information about the training data. With the recent legislation on right to be forgotten, it is crucially essential for the FL model to possess the ability to forget what it has learned from each client. We propose a novel federated unlearning method to eliminate a client's contribution by subtracting the accumulated historical updates from the model and leveraging the knowledge distillation method to restore the model's performance without using any data from the clients. This method does not have any restrictions on the type of neural networks and does not rely on clients' participation, so it is practical and efficient in the FL system. We further introduce backdoor attacks in the training process to help evaluate the unlearning effect. Experiments on three canonical datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our method.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In some specific learning scenarios, such as federated learning, the training dataset may not be accessible, and thus retraining cannot be conducted at all.
“Moreover, in some specific learning scenarios, such as federated learning [31, 32], the training dataset may not be accessible, and thus retraining cannot be conducted at all.”
From Machine Unlearning: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [31]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
Cited by 50
- Authors
- Wu, C., Zhu, S., & Mitra, P.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2201.09441
- OpenAlex
- W4226128336
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- federated unlearning, federated learning, knowledge distillation, right to be forgotten, data privacy, backdoor attacks, artificial neural networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review