PreprintCited by 50Privacy-Preserving Technologies in DataCryptography and Data SecurityDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

Federated Unlearning with Knowledge Distillation

Open access
Wu, Chen, Zhu, Sencun, Mitra, Prasenjit·2022·arXiv

Abstract

Federated Learning (FL) is designed to protect the data privacy of each client during the training process by transmitting only models instead of the original data. However, the trained model may memorize certain information about the training data. With the recent legislation on right to be forgotten, it is crucially essential for the FL model to possess the ability to forget what it has learned from each client. We propose a novel federated unlearning method to eliminate a client's contribution by subtracting the accumulated historical updates from the model and leveraging the knowledge distillation method to restore the model's performance without using any data from the clients. This method does not have any restrictions on the type of neural networks and does not rely on clients' participation, so it is practical and efficient in the FL system. We further introduce backdoor attacks in the training process to help evaluate the unlearning effect. Experiments on three canonical datasets demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our method.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2201.09441

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In some specific learning scenarios, such as federated learning, the training dataset may not be accessible, and thus retraining cannot be conducted at all.

    “Moreover, in some specific learning scenarios, such as federated learning [31, 32], the training dataset may not be accessible, and thus retraining cannot be conducted at all.”

    From Machine Unlearning: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [31]

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Cited by 50

Authors
Wu, C., Zhu, S., & Mitra, P.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4226128336
Cited by
50
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 15 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
federated unlearning, federated learning, knowledge distillation, right to be forgotten, data privacy, backdoor attacks, artificial neural networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review