The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPT
Open accessAbstract
We analyze the storage and recall of factual associations in autoregressive transformer language models, finding evidence that these associations correspond to localized, directly-editable computations. We first develop a causal intervention for identifying neuron activations that are decisive in a model's factual predictions. This reveals a distinct set of steps in middle-layer feed-forward modules that mediate factual predictions while processing subject tokens. To test our hypothesis that these computations correspond to factual association recall, we modify feed-forward weights to update specific factual associations using Rank-One Model Editing (ROME). We find that ROME is effective on a standard zero-shot relation extraction (zsRE) model-editing task, comparable to existing methods. To perform a more sensitive evaluation, we also evaluate ROME on a new dataset of counterfactual assertions, on which it simultaneously maintains both specificity and generalization, whereas other methods sacrifice one or another. Our results confirm an important role for mid-layer feed-forward modules in storing factual associations and suggest that direct manipulation of computational mechanisms may be a feasible approach for model editing. The code, dataset, visualizations, and an interactive demo notebook are available at https://rome.baulab.info/
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“FT-EWC [20], ROME [18], MEMIT [19], and MEND [31] edit the long-term memory stored in the LLMs' model parameters, but they either do not support continual editing or have negative effects on irrelevant knowledge (poor locality).”
From WISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Representations in later hidden layers propagate through residual connections without drastic changes [38, 18], enabling effective early exit in LLMs [39, 40].”
From WISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Furthermore, some neurons exhibit task-specific activations and can be predictive of model performance on these tasks [28,30-32].”
From From Text to Space: Mapping Abstract Spatial Models in LLMs during a Grid-World Navigation Task (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“research has shown that neurons across different layers tend to specialize, with middle layers often containing neurons that represent higher-level contextual features [26-29].”
From From Text to Space: Mapping Abstract Spatial Models in LLMs during a Grid-World Navigation Task (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Notably, these units are mostly located in intermediate and deeper layers, matching results from previous research that show higher-level reasoning and conceptual encodings in LLMs can be found in these layers [26-29].”
From From Text to Space: Mapping Abstract Spatial Models in LLMs during a Grid-World Navigation Task (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“These methods compute rank-one updates that modify model behavior for specific factual associations while preserving performance on unrelated tasks.”
From Subspace Collisions in Knowledge Editing: Orthogonal Low-Rank Updates for Scalable, Stable Model Edits (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Following prior work [6,7], we target mid-to-late MLP layers where factual knowledge is most directly encoded.”
From Subspace Collisions in Knowledge Editing: Orthogonal Low-Rank Updates for Scalable, Stable Model Edits (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“ROME [6] introduced causal tracing to identify key layers and applied rank-one updates to MLP weights, while MEMIT [7] extended this to mass editing by applying multiple rank-one updates sequentially.”
From Subspace Collisions in Knowledge Editing: Orthogonal Low-Rank Updates for Scalable, Stable Model Edits (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The ZsRE question-answering task [46] is extensively studied within the model editing literature [18, 19, 31, 15, 11]”
From WISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“ROME [18] uses causal analysis to pinpoint knowledge within specific MLP layers and modifies the entire matrix through least squares approximation.”
From WISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“ROME identifies factual associations and edits efficiently using MLP-based memories [18], extended by MEMIT for mass-editing [19].”
From WISE: Rethinking the Knowledge Memory for Lifelong Model Editing of Large Language Models (2024) · cites this paper as [18]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“[55] Presents a related study which intervenes on specific parts of the Transformer architecture [56] in order to make counterfactual edits to the model’s encoding of factual knowledge (what if Pierre Curie’s area of work is medicine?). They then observe that the model’s subsequent inferences (e.g. expectations about Pierre Curie’s professional accomplishments) are updated accordingly.”
From Symbols and grounding in large language models (2023) · cites this paper as [55]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“These 286 units were predominantly located in the middle layers of the model (approximately layers 12-22), consistent with the distribution of units encoding the agent's position (Fig. 3) and with previous studies reporting that higher-level conceptual processing in LLMs tends to emerge in intermediate layers [26-29].”
From From Text to Space: Mapping Abstract Spatial Models in LLMs during a Grid-World Navigation Task (2025) · cites this paper as [28]
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“Early approaches, such as ROME [6] and MEMIT [7], demonstrated that factual edits can be performed efficiently using low-rank weight updates applied to specific layers.”
From Subspace Collisions in Knowledge Editing: Orthogonal Low-Rank Updates for Scalable, Stable Model Edits (2026) · cites this paper as [6]
In the citing paper
“these edits should affect some other bits of knowledge (e.g., that the previously current president is now the past president) but leave many other facts unaffected [160].”
From Dissociating language and thought in large language models (2024) · cites this paper as [160]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- Adi, Y., Kermany, E., Belinkov, Y., Lavi, O., and Goldberg, Y. Fine-grained analysis of sentence embeddings using auxiliary prediction tasks. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , April 2017.
- Anderson, J. A. A simple neural network generating an interactive memory. Mathematical biosciences , 14(3-4):197-220, 1972.
- Bau, D., Liu, S., Wang, T., Zhu, J.-Y., and Torralba, A. Rewriting a deep generative model. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) , 2020.
- Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D., Wu, J., Winter, C., Hesse, C., Chen, M., Sigler, E., Litwin, M., Gray, S., Chess, B., Clark, J., Berner, C., McCandlish, S., Radford, A., Sutskever, I., and Amodei, D. Language models are few-shot learners. In Larochelle, H., Ranzato, M., Hadsell, R., Balcan, M. F., and Lin, H. (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , volume 33, pp. 1877-1901. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020. URL https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/ 2020/file/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64a-Paper.pdf .
- Dai, D., Dong, L., Hao, Y., Sui, Z., Chang, B., and Wei, F. Knowledge neurons in pretrained transformers. In Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) , pp. 8493-8502, 2022.
- De Cao, N., Aziz, W., and Titov, I. Editing factual knowledge in language models. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pp. 6491-6506, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, November 2021. Association for Computational Linguistics. URL https://aclanthology.org/2021.emnlp-main.522 .
- Elazar, Y., Kassner, N., Ravfogel, S., Ravichander, A., Hovy, E., Sch¨ utze, H., and Goldberg, Y. Measuring and Improving Consistency in Pretrained Language Models. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 9:1012-1031, 09 2021a. ISSN 2307-387X. doi: 10.1162/tacl a 00410. URL https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl\_a\_00410 . · DOI
- Elazar, Y., Ravfogel, S., Jacovi, A., and Goldberg, Y. Amnesic probing: Behavioral explanation with amnesic counterfactuals. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 9: 160-175, 2021b.
- Feder, A., Oved, N., Shalit, U., and Reichart, R. CausaLM: Causal model explanation through counterfactual language models. Computational Linguistics , 47(2):333-386, 2021.
- Geva, M., Schuster, R., Berant, J., and Levy, O. Transformer feed-forward layers are key-value memories. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing , pp. 5484-5495, Online and Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, November 2021. Association for Computational Linguistics. URL https://aclanthology.org/2021.emnlp-main.446 .
- Hase, P., Diab, M., Celikyilmaz, A., Li, X., Kozareva, Z., Stoyanov, V., Bansal, M., and Iyer, S. Do language models have beliefs? methods for detecting, updating, and visualizing model beliefs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.13654 , 2021. · arXiv
- Hupkes, D., Veldhoen, S., and Zuidema, W. Visualisation and 'diagnostic classifiers' reveal how recurrent and recursive neural networks process hierarchical structure. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , 61:907-926, 2018.
- Jiang, Z., Xu, F. F., Araki, J., and Neubig, G. How can we know what language models know? Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics , 8:423-438, 2020. doi: 10.1162/ tacl a 00324. URL https://aclanthology.org/2020.tacl-1.28 .
- Kingma, D. P. and Ba, J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. In Bengio, Y. and LeCun, Y. (eds.), 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, USA, May 7-9, 2015, Conference Track Proceedings , 2015. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/1412. 6980 .
- Kohonen, T. Correlation matrix memories. IEEE transactions on computers , 100(4):353-359, 1972.
- Meng, K., Sen Sharma, A., Andonian, A., Belinkov, Y., and Bau, D. Mass-editing memory in a transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.07229 , 2022. · arXiv
- Mitchell, E., Lin, C., Bosselut, A., Finn, C., and Manning, C. D. Fast model editing at scale. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2021.
- Pearl, J. Direct and indirect effects. In Proceedings of the Seventeenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence , pp. 411-420, 2001.
- Pearl, J. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference . Cambridge University Press, USA, 2nd edition, 2009. ISBN 052189560X.
- Radford, A., Wu, J., Child, R., Luan, D., Amodei, D., Sutskever, I., et al. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog , pp. 9, 2019.
- Raffel, C., Shazeer, N., Roberts, A., Lee, K., Narang, S., Matena, M., Zhou, Y., Li, W., and Liu, P. J. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. Journal of Machine Learning Research , 21(140):1-67, 2020.
- Sundararajan, M., Taly, A., and Yan, Q. Axiomatic attribution for deep networks. In International conference on machine learning , pp. 3319-3328. PMLR, 2017.
- Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, Ł., and Polosukhin, I. Attention is all you need. In Advances in neural information processing systems , pp. 5998-6008, 2017.
- Vig, J., Gehrmann, S., Belinkov, Y., Qian, S., Nevo, D., Sakenis, S., Huang, J., Singer, Y ., and Shieber, S. Causal mediation analysis for interpreting neural NLP: The case of gender bias. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.12265 , 2020a. · arXiv
- Vig, J., Gehrmann, S., Belinkov, Y., Qian, S., Nevo, D., Singer, Y., and Shieber, S. M. Investigating gender bias in language models using causal mediation analysis. In NeurIPS , 2020b.
- Zhang, Y., Galley, M., Gao, J., Gan, Z., Li, X., Brockett, C., and Dolan, W. B. Generating informative and diverse conversational responses via adversarial information maximization. In NeurIPS , 2018.
- Zhao, S., Pascual, D., Brunner, G., and Wattenhofer, R. Of non-linearity and commutativity in BERT. In 2021 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) , pp. 1-8. IEEE, 2021.
- Zhu, C., Rawat, A. S., Zaheer, M., Bhojanapalli, S., Li, D., Yu, F., and Kumar, S. Modifying memories in transformer models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.00363 , 2020. · arXiv
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–253 of 253
Assessing and Post-Processing Black Box Large Language Models for Knowledge Editing
Song, X., Wang, Z., He, K., Dong, G., Mou, Y., Zhao, J., & Xu, W. (2025) · International World Wide Web Conference (WWW) · doi:10.1145/3696410.3714732 · Cited by 1
DialGuide: Aligning Dialogue Model Behavior with Developer Guidelines
Gupta, P., Liu, Y., Jin, D., Hedayatnia, B., Gella, S., Liu, S., Lange, P. L., Hirschberg, J., & Hakkani-Tür, D. Z. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.935 · Cited by 1
Das, A., Tariq, A., Batalini, F., Dhara, B., & Banerjee, I. (2024) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.171777861.19290790/v1 · Cited by 1
Infinite-parameter Large Language ModelPreprint
Ding, F. (2024) · doi:10.33774/coe-2024-7khtw
AxBench: Steering LLMs? Even Simple Baselines Outperform Sparse Autoencoders
Wu, Z., Arora, A., Geiger, A., Wang, Z., Huang, J., Jurafsky, D., Manning, C. D., & Potts, C. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.17148
Adwant, G., & Srivastav, M. (2026) · doi:10.36227/techrxiv.176834437.78088768/v1
UltraEdit: Training-, Subject-, and Memory-Free Lifelong Editing in Language Models
Gu, X., Huang, Z., Gu, J.-C., & Zhang, K. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.14679 · Cited by 10
Design and Implementation of a Lightweight Neural Controller for LLM Agent Systems
Langay, B. B. (2026) · International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering Management & Applied Science · doi:10.51583/ijltemas.2026.150500172
An, J., Yang, L., Wang, M., Lu, L., An, W., & Yang, E. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.26323
From Text to Space: Mapping Abstract Spatial Models in LLMs during a Grid-World Navigation Task
Martorell, N. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2502.16690
The AI Hippocampus: How Far are We From Human Memory?
Jia, Z., Li, J., Kang, Y., Wang, Y., Wu, T., Wang, Q., Wang, X., Zhang, S., Shen, J., Li, Q., et al. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.09113
SEDM: Selective Self-Evolving Distributed Memory for Agents
Liu, Y., Min, A., Wang, Y., Yao, Y., Han, Y., Zhang, R., He, J., Li, Z., Qi, Y., Xu, H., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.09498 · Cited by 20
Data-efficient domain adaptation for pretrained language models
Guo, X. (2023) · DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) · doi:10.32657/10356/167965
WITHDRAWN: Visual interpretation for contextualized word representation
Deng, S.-T., Tsai, C.-J., Chang, P.-C., & Wang, K.-C. (2023) · Visual Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.visinf.2023.06.002 · Cited by 1
RetractedGórski, D. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4520187
A Glitch in the Matrix? Locating and Detecting Language Model Grounding with FakepediaPreprint
Monea, G., Peyrard, M., Josifoski, M., Chaudhary, V., Eisner, J. M., Kıcıman, E., Palangi, H., Patra, B., & West, R. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.02073
Bhattacharya, S., & Bojar, O. (2023) · BlackboxNLP Workshop on Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP (BlackboxNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.blackboxnlp-1.9 · Cited by 5
Evaluating Dependencies in Fact Editing for Language Models: Specificity and Implication Awareness
Li, Z., Arous, I., Reddy, S., & Cheung, J. C. K. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.511 · Cited by 1
DRAFT: Dense Retrieval Augmented Few-shot Topic classifier Framework
Kim, K., & Lee, Y. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.150
Ryu, S. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.27
Vectorizing string entries for data processing on tables: when are larger language models better?Preprint
Grinsztajn, L., Oyallon, E., Kim, M. J., & Varoquaux, G. P. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.09634 · Cited by 12
Zhang, N., Yao, Y., & Deng, S. (2023) · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.ijcnlp-tutorials.4
Programming Language Models in Multilingual Settings
Katzy, J. (2024) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering: Companion Proceedings (ICSE-Companion) · doi:10.1145/3639478.3639787
Mlke: A Benchmark for Multilingual Knowledge Editing on Large Language ModelPreprint
Song, R., Gao, S., Mao, C., & Yu, Z. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4882305
Neuron-Level Control Based on Multi-Frequency Policy Dissection
Yuhong, G., & Yu, Z. (2024) · International Conference on Cyber-Energy Systems and Intelligent Energy (ICCSIE) · doi:10.1109/iccsie61360.2024.10698246
AERO: Softmax-Only LLMs for Efficient Private InferencePreprint
Jha, N. K., & Reagen, B. (2024) · Qeios · doi:10.32388/wwlt24
Detoxifying Large Language Models via Kahneman-Tversky Optimization
Li, Q., Du, W., & Liu, J. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-97-9443-0_36 · Cited by 1
AERO: Softmax-Only LLMs for Efficient Private InferencePreprint
Jha, N. K., & Reagen, B. (2024) · Qeios · doi:10.32388/wwlt24.2
Empowering Comprehensive Biomedical Information Analysis with Large Language Models
Zhao, Y., Chen, J., Wu, N., & Wang, W. (2024) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-0840-9_17
X-neuron: Interpreting, Locating and Editing of Neurons in Reinforcement Learning Policy
Ge, Y., Zhao, X., Pang, J., Zhao, M., & Lin, D. (2024) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros58592.2024.10801727
Model Mapping: Can We Turn Transformers Into Programs?Preprint
Upadhyay, S., Keigwin, B., Wu, Y., Samkharadze, L., Hu, J., & Ginsburg, E. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5026576
Multi-MELO: Unified multimodal model editing with dynamic LoRA
Chen, Q., Yin, J., Yu, L., Zhou, J., & He, L. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.126766
Hidden Pieces: An Analysis of Linear Probes for GPT Representation Edits
Davis, A., & Sukthankar, G. (2024) · International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications · doi:10.1109/icmla61862.2024.00073 · Cited by 2
Research Agenda for Sociotechnical Approaches to AI SafetyPreprint
Curtis, S., Iyer, R., Kirk‐Giannini, C. D., Krakovna, V., Krueger, D., Lambert, N., Marnette, B., McKenzie, C., Michael, J., Miyazono, E., et al. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5097286
GPT-C: Generative PrompT Compression
Liu, L., Wang, R., Jing, L., Lv, F., & Zhu, Z. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10888801
Li, V. O. K., Yang, H., & Lam, J. C. K. (2025) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v39i17.34032 · Cited by 3
Novel Sequential Knowledge Batch Editing via Retrieving Padding Right Embedding
Zhu, L. (2025) · International Conference on Advanced Algorithms and Control Engineering (ICAACE) · doi:10.1109/icaace65325.2025.11019234
Boosting LLM’s Continual Sentiment Understanding for Low-Resource Languages
Zhang, H., Wang, J., Luo, J., Zhang, M., & Zhou, G. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslpro.2025.3581018 · Cited by 1
The Expressibility of Polynomial based Attention Scheme
Song, Z., Wang, C., Xu, G., & Yin, J. (2025) · ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD) · doi:10.1145/3711896.3737153 · Cited by 7
Transparent AI Without Deception, Limitation, and Guidance
Musker, S. (2025) · IEEE International Symposium on Ethics in Engineering, Science, and Technology (ETHICS) · doi:10.1109/ethics65148.2025.11098293
Model Mapping: Can We Turn Transformers Into Programs?Preprint
Upadhyay, S., Keigwin, B., Bandi, C., Wu, Y., Samkharadze, L., Hu, J., & Ginsberg, E. (2025) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.5361294
TraceTune: Targeted Fine-Tuning of Attention Heads for Text-to-SQL
Zamankhani, S., & Sattler, K.-U. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-02215-8_25
Beyond Computational Formalism or, Architecture Matters
Dobson, J. E. (2025) · Journal of Cultural Analytics · doi:10.22148/001c.133923 · Cited by 2
MECA: Modular editing via customized expert networks and adaptors in large language models
Nyange, R., Qiao, S., & Na, S. (2025) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2025.129675
Liu, Z., Shao, W., Shaolong, E., & Cao, X. (2025) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104418 · Cited by 1
Wang, M., Li, X., Zeng, Q., Liu, X., Yang, M., & Jia, Z. (2025) · Information · doi:10.3390/info16100900
Unified Cognitive Consciousness Theory: Introduction
Chang, E. Y. (2025) · ACM eBooks · doi:10.1145/3749421.3749428
MKE-PLLM: A benchmark for multilingual knowledge editing on pretrained large language model
Song, R., Gao, S., Gao, X., Mao, C., & Yu, Z. (2025) · Neurocomputing · doi:10.1016/j.neucom.2025.130979 · Cited by 1
Alignment Via Interpretability: Layerwise Counterfactuals To Detect Maladaptive Llm BehaviorsPreprint
Ugwumba, N. K., & Contreras, J. S. M. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8714712/v1
Right-to-be-Forgotten by Design in Adapter-Tuned Transformers
Ranade, D., & Jaiswal, R. R. (2026) · Conference on Human Centred Artificial Intelligence - Education and Practice (HCAIep) · doi:10.1145/3777490.3777507
Explainable AI (XAI) for Classical ML and LLMs
Gupta, B. P., Gayratovich, E. N., Kholiyarov, E., Nazirjon, R., Gulkhayo, O., Mahmudovich, J. A., & Polvanov, S. (2026) · Advances in computational intelligence and robotics book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3373-6761-3.ch005
Dementia Language Models: a generalizable and controllable representation of cognitive impairmentPreprint
Peled-Cohen, L., Shmidov, A., Rein, N., Shapira, E., Calderon, N., Tikochinski, R., Zeltzer, E., Nathan, T., Uliel, B., Mueller, K. D., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.09.16.752129
Metadata
- Authors
- Meng, K., Bau, D., Andonian, A., & Belinkov, Y.
- Affiliations
- Northeastern University (US)
- MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory (US)
- Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2202.05262
- OpenAlex
- W4281657280
- Cited by
- 230
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 75 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Open Philanthropy Project
- Azrieli Foundation
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (HR0011, FA8750)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Keywords
- model editing, Rome, causal intervention, neuronal activation, zero-shot relation extraction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
