The DOI matches its DataCite record; 55 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Shapley Value in Machine Learning
Open accessAbstract
Over the last few years, the Shapley value, a solution concept from cooperative game theory, has found numerous applications in machine learning. In this paper, we first discuss fundamental concepts of cooperative game theory and axiomatic properties of the Shapley value. Then we give an overview of the most important applications of the Shapley value in machine learning: feature selection, explainability, multi-agent reinforcement learning, ensemble pruning, and data valuation. We examine the most crucial limitations of the Shapley value and point out directions for future research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“The Shapley value measures the contribution of features in a machine-learning model and is widely used in algorithms such as deep learning, graphical models and reinforcement learning85.”
From Inferring gene regulatory networks from single-cell multiome data using atlas-scale external data (2025) · cites this paper as [85]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions
Lundberg, S., & Lee, S.-I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1705.07874 · Cited by 23,707
An introduction to variable and feature selection
GuyonIsabelle, & ElisseeffAndré (2003) · Journal of Machine Learning Research · doi:10.5555/944919.944968 · Cited by 8,354
Detection of Influential Observation in Linear Regression
Cook, R. D. (1977) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1977.10489493 · Cited by 3,418
Simulation and the Monte Carlo Method
Rubinstein, R. Y., & Kroese, D. P. (2016) · Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics · doi:10.1002/9781118631980 · Cited by 3,356
Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functions
Koh, P. W., & Liang, P. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1703.04730 · Cited by 1,514
Polynomial calculation of the Shapley value based on sampling
Castro, J., Gómez, D., & Tejada, J. (2009) · Computers & Operations Research · doi:10.1016/j.cor.2008.04.004 · Cited by 601
Values of Games with a Priori Unions
Owen, G. (1977) · Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-45494-3_7 · Cited by 453
Data Shapley: Equitable Valuation of Data for Machine LearningPreprint
Ghorbani, A., & Zou, J. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1904.02868 · Cited by 434
Multilinear Extensions of Games
Owen, G. (1972) · Management Science · doi:10.1287/mnsc.18.5.64 · Cited by 425
The many Shapley values for model explanationPreprint
Sundararajan, M., & Najmi, A. (2019) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1908.08474 · Cited by 415
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Marco Ancona, Cengiz Oztireli, and Markus Gross. Explaining Deep Neural Networks with a Polynomial Time Algorithm for Shapley Value Approxima- tion. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 272-281, 2019.
- Frye et al., 2020a] Christopher Frye, Damien de Mijolla, Tom Begley, et al. Shapley Explainability on the Data Manifold. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2020.
- Frye et al., 2020b] Christopher Frye, Colin Rowat, and Ilya Feige. Asymmetric Shapley Values: Incorporating Causal Knowledge Into Model-Agnostic Explainability. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 2020.
- Pintér, 2011] Miklós Pintér. Regression games. Annals of Operations Research, 186(1):263-274, 2011.
- Lloyd Shapley. A Value for N-Person Games. Contributions to the Theory of Games, pages 307-317, 1953.
- Yan et al., 2021] Tom Yan and Ariel Procaccia. If You Like Shapley Then You Will Love the Core. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference, pages 5751-5759, 2021.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 301–312 of 312
Zhang, Y., Xie, W., Li, X., Liao, W., Shu, T., Zhou, J., & Wang, J. (2026) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0357018
Loseto, G., Gramegna, F., Pinto, A., Scioscia, F., & Ruta, M. (2026) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-026-02204-0
On the Fragility of Contribution Evaluation in Federated Learning
Pejó, B., Frank, M., Varga, K., Veliczky, P., & Biczók, G. (2026) · IEEE Conference on Secure and Trustworthy Machine Learning (SaTML) · doi:10.1109/satml68715.2026.00019
Choquet integral and shapley value-based operators for context-aware recommendation
Zammali, S., & Yahia, S. B. (2026) · Fuzzy Sets and Systems · doi:10.1016/j.fss.2026.110133
Cambranis-Boldo, P., Martinez, G. S., Farias, A. B., & Pérez‐Rueda, E. (2026) · Briefings in Functional Genomics · doi:10.1093/bfgp/elag008
Part 1: Artificial intelligence in neurointerventional surgery: current state and challenges
Vargas, J., Hoffman, H., Schirmer, C. M., Hui, F. K., 河野健一, Booth, T. C., Kellogg, R. T., & Levitt, M. (2026) · JNIS Advances · doi:10.1136/jnisadv-2026-000011
A Review of Deep Learning Models and Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Pathology Recognition
Toala-Paz, A., Becerra-Andrade, A., Cevallos-Levicek, D., Peláez, E., Domínguez, F., & Loayza, F. R. (2026) · International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment · doi:10.1109/icedeg70169.2026.11695396
Gao, J., Sun, H., Cui, X., Jiang, J., Xu, Z., Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2026) · GIScience & Remote Sensing · doi:10.1080/15481603.2026.2745215
Lago, F. D., D’Alterio, R. A., Hafiz, F. M. F., Torre, D. L., & Lin, J. (2026) · Annals of Operations Research · doi:10.1007/s10479-026-07434-0
Li, Y., & Dev, S. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-11062046/v1
Agree or Disagree: A Bargaining Framework for Dynamically Composing Rewards in Summarization
Dai, Y., Chan, C. F., Wong, Y. K., & Pun, T. H. (2026) · International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN) · doi:10.1109/ijcnn69854.2026.11729444
Peak Particle Velocity Prediction Model Based on I-GWO-BP Network and SHAP Method
Yao, Y., Yu, M., Wu, C., Jia, Y., Cui, X., Jiang, N., Huang, J., & Liu, C. (2026) · Algorithms · doi:10.3390/a19110909
Metadata
- Authors
- Rozemberczki, B., Watson, L., Bayer, P., Yang, H.-T., Kiss, O., Nilsson, S., & Sarkar, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Toulouse School of Economics (FR)
- Central European University (AT)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- Pages
- 5572-5579
- arXiv
- 2202.05594
- OpenAlex
- W4285606919
- Cited by
- 312
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 61 · 2025: 109 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 17
- FWCI
- 230.30
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Research Centre (EP/V011189/1)
- UK Research and Innovation (EP/V011189/1)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Game Theory and Voting Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
- Keywords
- Shapley value, cooperative game theory, axiomatic properties, feature selection, explainable AI, multi-agent reinforcement learning, ensemble pruning, data valuation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
