PreprintCited by 14Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningMachine Learning and Data ClassificationAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

MetaShift: A Dataset of Datasets for Evaluating Contextual Distribution Shifts and Training Conflicts

Open access

Abstract

Understanding the performance of machine learning models across diverse data distributions is critically important for reliable applications. Motivated by this, there is a growing focus on curating benchmark datasets that capture distribution shifts. While valuable, the existing benchmarks are limited in that many of them only contain a small number of shifts and they lack systematic annotation about what is different across different shifts. We present MetaShift--a collection of 12,868 sets of natural images across 410 classes--to address this challenge. We leverage the natural heterogeneity of Visual Genome and its annotations to construct MetaShift. The key construction idea is to cluster images using its metadata, which provides context for each image (e.g. "cats with cars" or "cats in bathroom") that represent distinct data distributions. MetaShift has two important benefits: first, it contains orders of magnitude more natural data shifts than previously available. Second, it provides explicit explanations of what is unique about each of its data sets and a distance score that measures the amount of distribution shift between any two of its data sets. We demonstrate the utility of MetaShift in benchmarking several recent proposals for training models to be robust to data shifts. We find that the simple empirical risk minimization performs the best when shifts are moderate and no method had a systematic advantage for large shifts. We also show how MetaShift can help to visualize conflicts between data subsets during model training.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2202.06523

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Techniques such as working with data subsets, fine-tuning hyperparameters, and employing transfer learning have the potential to expedite the training process and alleviate strain on requisite computer systems.

    “These methods have the potential to expedite the training process and alleviate strain on the requisite computer systems.”

    From Large language models (LLMs): survey, technical frameworks, and future challenges (2024) · cites this paper as Liang and Zou 2022

    Section 4.3 (pp. 8–9) studies how training on different data subsets affects model performance, while Appendix A.2 (p. 14) reports the hardware used and trial duration. Neither says that using subsets, tuning hyperparameters, or transfer learning expedites training or reduces strain on computer systems. Searches for those methods and for reduced training time and computational demands found no supporting passage. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. [2]2. Yunhui Guo, Noel C Codella, Leonid Karlinsky, James V Codella, John R Smith, Kate Saenko, Tajana Rosing, and Rogerio Feris. A broader study of cross-domain few-shot learning. In European Conference on Computer Vision , pp. 124-141. Springer, 2020. - Y. He, Z. Shen, and P. Cui. Towards non-IID image classification: A dataset and baselines. Pattern Recognition , 110, 2020. - D. Hendrycks and T. Dietterich. Benchmarking neural network robustness to common corruptions and perturbations. In International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR) , 2019.
  2. [5]5. Drew A. Hudson and Christopher D. Manning. GQA: A new dataset for real-world visual reasoning and compositional question answering. In CVPR , pp. 6700-6709. Computer Vision Foundation / IEEE, 2019.
  3. [6]6. Zachary Izzo, Lexing Ying, and James Y. Zou. How to learn when data reacts to your model: Performative gradient descent. In ICML , 2021.
  4. [7]7. Zachary Izzo, James Zou, and Lexing Ying. How to learn when data gradually reacts to your model. In AISTATS , 2022.
  5. [8]8. Allison Koenecke, Andrew Nam, Emily Lake, Joe Nudell, Minnie Quartey, Zion Mengesha, Connor Toups, John R Rickford, Dan Jurafsky, and Sharad Goel. Racial disparities in automated speech recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 117(14):7684-7689, 2020.
  6. [9]9. Pang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie, Marvin Zhang, Akshay Balsubramani, Weihua Hu, Michihiro Yasunaga, Richard Lanas Phillips, Sara Beery, Jure Leskovec, Anshul Kundaje, Emma Pierson, Sergey Levine, Chelsea Finn, and Percy Liang. WILDS: A benchmark of in-the-wild distribution shifts. CoRR , abs/2012.07421, 2020. · arXiv
  7. [10]10. Ranjay Krishna, Yuke Zhu, Oliver Groth, Justin Johnson, Kenji Hata, Joshua Kravitz, Stephanie Chen, Yannis Kalantidis, Li-Jia Li, David A. Shamma, Michael S. Bernstein, and Li Fei-Fei. Visual genome: Connecting language and vision using crowdsourced dense image annotations. Int. J. Comput. Vis. , 123(1):32-73, 2017.
  8. [11]11. Yongchan Kwon and James Zou. Beta shapley: a unified and noise-reduced data valuation framework for machine learning. In AISTATS , 2022.
  9. [12]12. Weixin Liang, James Zou, and Zhou Yu. Beyond user self-reported likert scale ratings: A comparison model for automatic dialog evaluation. In ACL , pp. 1363-1374. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020a.
  10. [13]13. Weixin Liang, James Y. Zou, and Zhou Yu. Alice: Active learning with contrastive natural language explanations. In EMNLP , 2020b.
  11. [14]14. Weixin Liang, Kaihui Liang, and Zhou Yu. HERALD: an annotation efficient method to detect user disengagement in social conversations. In ACL/IJCNLP (1) , pp. 3652-3665. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2021.
  12. [15]15. Tsung-Yi Lin, Michael Maire, Serge J. Belongie, James Hays, Pietro Perona, Deva Ramanan, Piotr Dollár, and C. Lawrence Zitnick. Microsoft COCO: common objects in context. In ECCV (5) , volume 8693 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science , pp. 740-755. Springer, 2014.
  13. [16]16. Mingsheng Long, Zhangjie Cao, Jianmin Wang, and Michael I. Jordan. Conditional adversarial domain adaptation. In NeurIPS , pp. 1647-1657, 2018.
  14. [17]17. Mengye Ren, Eleni Triantafillou, Sachin Ravi, Jake Snell, Kevin Swersky, Joshua B Tenenbaum, Hugo Larochelle, and Richard S Zemel. Meta-learning for semi-supervised few-shot classification. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2018.
  15. [18]18. Kate Saenko, Brian Kulis, Mario Fritz, and Trevor Darrell. Adapting visual category models to new domains. In ECCV (4) , volume 6314 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science , pp. 213-226. Springer, 2010. - Shiori Sagawa, Pang Wei Koh, Tatsunori B. Hashimoto, and Percy Liang. Distributionally robust neural networks. In ICLR . OpenReview.net, 2020. - Shibani Santurkar, Dimitris Tsipras, and Aleksander Madry. Breeds: Benchmarks for subpopulation shift. In International Conference on Learning Representations , 2020. - Baochen Sun and Kate Saenko. Deep CORAL: correlation alignment for deep domain adaptation. In ECCV Workshops (3) , volume 9915 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science , pp. 443-450, 2016. - Swabha Swayamdipta, Roy Schwartz, Nicholas Lourie, Yizhong Wang, Hannaneh Hajishirzi, Noah A. Smith, and Yejin Choi. Dataset cartography: Mapping and diagnosing datasets with training dynamics. In EMNLP (1) , pp. 9275-9293. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020. - Bart Thomee, David A. Shamma, Gerald Friedland, Benjamin Elizalde, Karl Ni, Douglas Poland, Damian Borth, and Li-Jia Li. YFCC100M: the new data in multimedia research. Commun. ACM , 59(2):64-73, 2016. - Eleni Triantafillou, Tyler Zhu, Vincent Dumoulin, Pascal Lamblin, Utku Evci, Kelvin Xu, Ross Goroshin, Carles Gelada, Kevin Swersky, Pierre-Antoine Manzagol, et al. Meta-dataset: A dataset of datasets for learning to learn from few examples. arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.03096 , 2019. - Hemanth Venkateswara, Jose Eusebio, Shayok Chakraborty, and Sethuraman Panchanathan. Deep hashing network for unsupervised domain adaptation. In CVPR , pp. 5385-5394. IEEE Computer Society, 2017. - D. E. Worrall, S. J. Garbin, D. Turmukhambetov, and G. J. Brostow. Harmonic networks: Deep translation and rotation equivariance. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) , pp. 5028-5037, 2017. - Huaxiu Yao, Yu Wang, Sai Li, Linjun Zhang, Weixin Liang, James Y. Zou, and Chelsea Finn. Improving out-of-distribution robustness via selective augmentation. ArXiv , abs/2201.00299, 2022. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Liang, W., & Zou, J.
Affiliations
Stanford University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4221154703
Cited by
14
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
distribution shift, benchmark dataset, image metadata, Visual Genome, image clustering, distribution shift robustness, empirical risk minimization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review