Machine Learning Operations: A Survey on MLOps Tool Support
Open accessAbstract
Machine Learning (ML) has become a fast-growing, trending approach in solution development in practice. Deep Learning (DL) which is a subset of ML, learns using deep neural networks to simulate the human brain. It trains machines to learn techniques and processes individually using computer algorithms, which is also considered to be a role of Artificial Intelligence (AI). In this paper, we study current technical issues related to software development and delivery in organizations that work on ML projects. Therefore, the importance of the Machine Learning Operations (MLOps) concept, which can deliver appropriate solutions for such concerns, is discussed. We investigate commercially available MLOps tool support in software development. The comparison between MLOps tools analyzes the performance of each system and its use cases. Moreover, we examine the features and usability of MLOps tools to identify the most appropriate tool support for given scenarios. Finally, we recognize that there is a shortage in the availability of a fully functional MLOps platform on which processes can be automated by reducing human intervention.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In productive settings, it is challenging to operate ML manually due to different stacks of software and hardware components and their interplay as well as the selection of both.
“In productive settings, it is challenging to operate ML manually due to different stacks of software and hardware components and their interplay as well as the selection of both ( [64], [65].”
From Machine Learning Operations (MLOps): Overview, Definition, and Architecture (2023) · cites this paper as [65]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Machine Learning Operations (MLOps): Overview, Definition, and Architecture
Kreuzberger, D., Kühl, N., & Hirschl, S. (2023) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2023.3262138 · Cited by 766 · see citing works
Towards Trustworthy Machine Learning in Production: An Overview of the Robustness in MLOps Approach
Bayram, F., & Ahmed, B. S. (2025) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3708497 · Cited by 48 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of Machine Learning DevOps
Mboweni, T., Masombuka, T., & Dongmo, C. (2022) · 2022 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Energy Technologies (ICECET) · doi:10.1109/icecet55527.2022.9872968 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hewage, N., & Meedeniya, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Moratuwa (LK)
- ORCID
- Meedeniya, Dulani
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2202.10169
- OpenAlex
- W4221072216
- Cited by
- 38
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Software System Performance and Reliability
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Software Engineering Research
- Keywords
- MLOps, tool comparison, deep learning, software delivery, automation, usability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review