The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Integration of knowledge and data in machine learning
Open accessAbstract
Scientific research's mandate is to comprehend and explore the world, as well as to improve it based on experience and knowledge. Knowledge embedding and knowledge discovery are two significant methods of integrating knowledge and data. Through knowledge embedding, the barriers between knowledge and data can be eliminated, and machine learning models with physical common sense can be established. Meanwhile, humans' understanding of the world is always limited, and knowledge discovery takes advantage of machine learning to extract new knowledge from observations. Knowledge discovery can not only assist researchers to better grasp the nature of physics, but it can also support them in conducting knowledge embedding research. A closed loop of knowledge generation and usage are formed by combining knowledge embedding with knowledge discovery, which can improve the robustness and accuracy of models and uncover previously unknown scientific principles. This study summarizes and analyzes extant literature, as well as identifies research gaps and future opportunities.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Expert knowledge contrast is a relatively new representation learning framework. Generally speaking, this modeling framework incorporates expert prior knowledge or information into deep neural networks to guide model training [140], [141].”
From Self-Supervised Learning for Time Series Analysis: Taxonomy, Progress, and Prospects (2024) · cites this paper as [141]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, introducing reasonable inductive bias or prior is helpful for many deep neural networks-based modeling tasks [140], [196], [197].”
From Self-Supervised Learning for Time Series Analysis: Taxonomy, Progress, and Prospects (2024) · cites this paper as [197]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Self-Supervised Learning for Time Series Analysis: Taxonomy, Progress, and Prospects
Zhang, K., Wen, Q., Zhang, C., Cai, R., Jin, M., Liu, Y., Zhang, J. Y., Liang, Y., Pang, G., Song, D., et al. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3387317 · Cited by 295
“Generally speaking, this modeling framework incorporates expert prior knowledge or information into deep neural networks to guide model training [140], [141].”
Method
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, Y., & Zhang, D.
- Affiliations
- Southern University of Science and Technology (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2202.10337
- OpenAlex
- W4223522428
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (62106116)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Knowledge Management and Technology
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Keywords
- knowledge embedding, knowledge discovery, scientific knowledge production, model robustness
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
