PreprintCited by 10Digital Media Forensic DetectionFace recognition and analysisMisinformation and Its Impacts

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Deepfake Detection for Facial Images with Facemasks

Open access
Ko, Donggeun, Lee, Sangjun, Park, Jinyong, Shin, Saebyeol, Hong, Donghee, Woo, Simon S.·2022·arXiv

Abstract

Hyper-realistic face image generation and manipulation have givenrise to numerous unethical social issues, e.g., invasion of privacy,threat of security, and malicious political maneuvering, which re-sulted in the development of recent deepfake detection methods with the rising demands of deepfake forensics. Proposed deepfake detection methods to date have shown remarkable detection performance and robustness. However, none of the suggested deepfake detection methods assessed the performance of deepfakes with the facemask during the pandemic crisis after the outbreak of theCovid-19. In this paper, we thoroughly evaluate the performance of state-of-the-art deepfake detection models on the deepfakes with the facemask. Also, we propose two approaches to enhance the masked deepfakes detection: face-patch and face-crop. The experimental evaluations on both methods are assessed through the base-line deepfake detection models on the various deepfake datasets. Our extensive experiments show that, among the two methods, face-crop performs better than the face-patch, and could be a train method for deepfake detection models to detect fake faces with facemask in real world.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2202.11359

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Face occlusion significantly reduces detection accuracy.

    “during the COVID-19 pandemic, researchers [43] introduced a masked deepfake dataset, revealing that face occlusion significantly reduces detection accuracy, highlighting the importance of robustness testing in practical conditions.”

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ko, D., Lee, S., Park, J., Shin, S., Hong, D., & Woo, S. S.
Affiliations
Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
Pages
27-30
OpenAlex
W4281397290
Cited by
10
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 6
FWCI
0.80
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Digital Media Forensic Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
Keywords
deepfake detection, face masks, face image manipulation, deepfake forensics, COVID-19 pandemic, privacy risks, security threats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review