The DOI matches its DataCite record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?
Open accessAbstract
Large language models (LMs) are able to in-context learn -- perform a new task via inference alone by conditioning on a few input-label pairs (demonstrations) and making predictions for new inputs. However, there has been little understanding of how the model learns and which aspects of the demonstrations contribute to end task performance. In this paper, we show that ground truth demonstrations are in fact not required -- randomly replacing labels in the demonstrations barely hurts performance on a range of classification and multi-choce tasks, consistently over 12 different models including GPT-3. Instead, we find that other aspects of the demonstrations are the key drivers of end task performance, including the fact that they provide a few examples of (1) the label space, (2) the distribution of the input text, and (3) the overall format of the sequence. Together, our analysis provides a new way of understanding how and why in-context learning works, while opening up new questions about how much can be learned from large language models through inference alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Min et al. [44] has shown that rather than learning new tasks, in-context learning [42] works by activating patterns from the training data.”
From RoboPoint: A Vision-Language Model for Spatial Affordance Prediction for Robotics (2024) · cites this paper as [44]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1810.04805 · Cited by 73,173
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach
Liu, Y., Ott, M., Goyal, N., Du, J., Joshi, M., Chen, D., Levy, O., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Stoyanov, V. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1907.11692 · Cited by 16,515
Self-citationExploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer
Raffel, C., Shazeer, N., Roberts, A., Lee, K., Narang, S., Matena, M., Zhou, Y., Li, W., & Liu, P. J. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.10683 · Cited by 10,929
Lewis, M., Liu, Y., Goyal, N., Ghazvininejad, M., Mohamed, A., Levy, O., Stoyanov, V., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.703 · Cited by 8,821
Self-citationChain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q., & Zhou, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.11903 · Cited by 4,263
GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding
Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5446 · Cited by 4,222
The PASCAL Recognising Textual Entailment Challenge
Dagan, I., Glickman, O., & Magnini, B. (2006) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/11736790_9 · Cited by 1,674
Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answering
Mihaylov, T., Clark, P. E., Khot, T., & Sabharwal, A. (2018) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d18-1260 · Cited by 1,602
Automatically Constructing a Corpus of Sentential Paraphrases.
Dolan, W. B., & Brockett, C. (2005) · Cited by 1,101
Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learners
Wei, J., Bosma, M., Zhao, V. Y., Guu, K., Yu, A. W., Lester, B., Du, N., Dai, A. M., & Le, Q. V. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2109.01652 · Cited by 1,101
SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systems
Wang, A., Pruksachatkun, Y., Nangia, N., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. R. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1905.00537 · Cited by 1,051
Prompt Programming for Large Language Models: Beyond the Few-Shot Paradigm
Reynolds, L., & McDonell, K. (2021) · Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411763.3451760 · Cited by 952 · cited 1×
“This is in line with Reynolds and McDonell (2021) who claim that the demonstrations are for task location and the intrinsic ability to perform the task is obtained at pretraining time.”
ResultTweetEval: Unified Benchmark and Comparative Evaluation for Tweet Classification
Barbieri, F., Camacho-Collados, J., Anke, L. E., & Neves, L. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP (Findings of EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.148 · Cited by 929
Levesque, H. J., Davis, E., & Morgenstern, L. (2011) · Cited by 879
CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense KnowledgePreprint
Talmor, A., Herzig, J., Lourie, N., & Berant, J. (2018) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1811.00937 · Cited by 822
The Third PASCAL Recognizing Textual Entailment Challenge
Giampiccolo, D., Magnini, B., Dagan, I., & Dolan, B. (2007) · ACL-PASCAL@ACL · doi:10.3115/1654536.1654538 · Cited by 801
It’s Not Just Size That Matters: Small Language Models Are Also Few-Shot Learners
Schick, T., & Schütze, H. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.naacl-main.185 · Cited by 747
A SICK cure for the evaluation of compositional distributional semantic models
Marelli, M., Menini, S., Baroni, M., Bentivogli, L., Bernardi, R., & Zamparelli, R. (2014) · Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC) · doi:10.63317/39qdhuevzbqa · Cited by 693
Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity
Lu, Y., Bartolo, M., Moore, A., Riedel, S., & Stenetorp, P. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2104.08786 · Cited by 615 · cited 2×
“At the same time, some work reports brittleness and over-sensitivity for in-context learning (Lu et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2021; Mishra et al., 2021a).”
BackgroundMultitask Prompted Training Enables Zero-Shot Task Generalization
Sanh, V., Webson, A., Raffel, C., Bach, S. H., Sutawika, L., Alyafeai, Z., Chaffin, A., Stiegler, A., Scao, T. L., Raja, A., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.08207 · Cited by 612
Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivity
Lu, Y., Bartolo, M., Moore, A., Riedel, S., & Stenetorp, P. (2022) · Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.556 · Cited by 610
UNIFIEDQA: Crossing Format Boundaries with a Single QA System
Khashabi, D., Min, S., Khot, T., Sabharwal, A., Tafjord, O., Clark, P., & Hajishirzi, H. (2020) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2020 · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.findings-emnlp.171 · Cited by 514
Self-citationGood debt or bad debt: Detecting semantic orientations in economic texts
Malo, P., Sinha, A., Korhonen, P., Wallenius, J., & Takala, P. (2014) · Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/asi.23062 · Cited by 513
Calibrate Before Use: Improving Few-Shot Performance of Language Models
Zhao, T. Z., Wallace, E., Feng, S., Klein, D., & Singh, S. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.09690 · Cited by 513
The Pile: An 800GB Dataset of Diverse Text for Language Modeling
Gao, L., Biderman, S., Black, S., Golding, L., Hoppe, T., Foster, C., Phang, J., He, H., Thite, A., Nabeshima, N., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.00027 · Cited by 492
The CommitmentBank: Investigating projection in naturally occurring discourse
de Marneffe, M.-C., Simons, M., & Tonhauser, J. (2019) · Digital Access to Libraries · doi:10.18148/sub/2019.v23i2.601 · Cited by 471
Think you have Solved Question Answering? Try ARC, the AI2 Reasoning Challenge
Clark, P., Cowhey, I., Etzioni, O., Khot, T., Sabharwal, A., Schoenick, C., & Tafjord, O. (2018) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1803.05457 · Cited by 462
Hate Speech Dataset from a White Supremacy Forum
de Gibert, O., Pérez, N., Pablos, A. G., & Cuadros, M. (2018) · Workshop on Abusive Language Online (ALW) · doi:10.18653/v1/w18-5102 · Cited by 428
Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Zero-Shot Learning
Kodirov, E., Xiang, T., Fu, Z., & Gong, S. (2015) · IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.282 · Cited by 415
Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learning
Rubin, O., Herzig, J., & Berant, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.191 · Cited by 374
Datasets: A Community Library for Natural Language Processing
Lhoest, Q., Villanova del Moral, A., Jernite, Y., Thakur, A., von Platen, P., Patil, S., Chaumond, J., Drame, M., Plu, J., Tunstall, L., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-demo.21 · Cited by 343
CLIMATE-FEVER: A Dataset for Verification of Real-World Climate ClaimsPreprint
Diggelmann, T., Boyd-Graber, J. L., Bulian, J., Ciaramita, M., & Leippold, M. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.00614 · Cited by 280
Cross-Task Generalization via Natural Language Crowdsourcing Instructions
Mishra, S., Khashabi, D., Baral, C., & Hajishirzi, H. (2022) · Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.244 · Cited by 269
Self-citationDREAM: A Challenge Data Set and Models for Dialogue-Based Reading Comprehension
Sun, K., Yu, D., Chen, J., Yu, D., Choi, Y., & Cardie, C. (2019) · Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/tacl_a_00264 · Cited by 252
ETHOS: a multi-label hate speech detection dataset
Mollas, I., Chrysopoulou, Z., Karlos, S., & Tsoumakas, G. (2022) · Complex & Intelligent Systems · doi:10.1007/s40747-021-00608-2 · Cited by 243
Efficient Large Scale Language Modeling with Mixtures of Experts
Artetxe, M., Bhosale, S., Goyal, N., Mihaylov, T., Ott, M., Shleifer, S., Lin, X. V., Du, J., Iyer, S. V., Pasunuru, R., et al. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.804 · Cited by 223
Self-citationDo Prompt-Based Models Really Understand the Meaning of Their Prompts?
Webson, A., & Pavlick, E. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.167 · Cited by 203
Muppet: Massive Multi-task Representations with Pre-Finetuning
Aghajanyan, A., Gupta, A., Shrivastava, A., Chen, X., Zettlemoyer, L., & Gupta, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.468 · Cited by 183
Self-citationNoisy Channel Language Model Prompting for Few-Shot Text Classification
Min, S., Lewis, M., Hajishirzi, H., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.365 · Cited by 181
Self-citationCrossFit: A Few-shot Learning Challenge for Cross-task Generalization in NLP
Ye, Q., Lin, B. Y., & Ren, X. (2021) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.572 · Cited by 154
What Makes Good In-Context Examples for GPT-$3$?
Liu, J., Shen, D., Zhang, Y., Dolan, B., Carin, L., & Chen, W. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2101.06804 · Cited by 148
Meta-learning via Language Model In-context Tuning
Chen, Y., Zhong, R., Zha, S., Karypis, G., & He, H. (2022) · Proceedings of the conference - Association for Computational Linguistics. Meeting · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.acl-long.53 · Cited by 143
Reframing Instructional Prompts to GPTk’s Language
Mishra, S. R., Khashabi, D., Baral, C. R., Choi, Y., & Hajishirzi, H. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL (Findings of ACL) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.50 · Cited by 140
Self-citationAn Explanation of In-context Learning as Implicit Bayesian Inference
Xie, S. M., Raghunathan, A., Liang, P., & Ma, T. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2111.02080 · Cited by 138
Cutting Down on Prompts and Parameters: Simple Few-Shot Learning with Language Models
Logan IV, R., Balazevic, I., Wallace, E., Petroni, F., Singh, S., & Riedel, S. (2022) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2022 · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.findings-acl.222 · Cited by 133
Surface Form Competition: Why the Highest Probability Answer Isn’t Always Right
Holtzman, A., West, P., Shwartz, V., Choi, Y., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.564 · Cited by 127
Self-citationThe Turking Test: Can Language Models Understand Instructions?Preprint
Efrat, A., & Levy, O. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2010.11982 · Cited by 109
Ground-Truth Labels Matter: A Deeper Look into Input-Label Demonstrations
Yoo, K. M., Kim, J., Kim, H. J., Cho, H., Jo, H., Lee, S., Lee, S., & Kim, T. (2022) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.155 · Cited by 91
SemEval-2012 Task 7: Choice of Plausible Alternatives: An Evaluation of Commonsense Causal Reasoning
Gordon, A. S., Kozareva, Z., & Roemmele, M. (2012) · Cited by 84
QuaRTz: An Open-Domain Dataset of Qualitative Relationship Questions
Tafjord, O., Gardner, M., Lin, K., & Clark, P. E. (2019) · Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1608 · Cited by 72
MetaICL: Learning to Learn In Context
Min, S., Lewis, M., Zettlemoyer, L., & Hajishirzi, H. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2110.15943 · Cited by 61
Self-citationImpact of Pretraining Term Frequencies on Few-Shot Reasoning
Razeghi, Y., Logan, R. L., Gardner, M., & Singh, S. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2202.07206 · Cited by 53
Investigating Societal Biases in a Poetry Composition SystemPreprint
Sheng, E., & Uthus, D. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2011.02686 · Cited by 26
Text and Patterns: For Effective Chain of Thought, It Takes Two to Tango
Madaan, A., & Yazdanbakhsh, A. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2209.07686 · Cited by 24
QASC: A Dataset for Question Answering via Sentence Composition
Khot, T., Clark, P., Guerquin, M., Jansen, P., & Sabharwal, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v34i05.6319 · Cited by 20
McCreery, C. H., Katariya, N., Kannan, A., Chablani, M., & Amatriain, X. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2008.13546 · Cited by 16
QUAREL: A Dataset and Models for Answering Questions about Qualitative Relationships
Tafjord, O., Clark, P. E., Gardner, M., Yih, W.-T., & Sabharwal, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33017063 · Cited by 10
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Michael Chen, Mike D'Arcy, Alisa Liu, Jared Fer- nandez, and Doug Downey. 2019. CODAH: An adversarially-authored question answering dataset for common sense. In Proceedings of the 3rd Work- shop on Evaluating Vector Space Representations for NLP.
- Ido Dagan, Oren Glickman, and Bernardo Magnini. 2005. The pascal recognising textual entailment chal- lenge. In Machine Learning Challenges Workshop.
- Ioannis Mollas, Zoe Chrysopoulou, Stamatis Karlos, and Grigorios Tsoumakas. 2020. Ethos: an online hate speech detection dataset. ArXiv.
- Wei Wang, Vincent W Zheng, Han Yu, and Chunyan Miao. 2019b. A survey of zero-shot learning: Set- tings, methods, and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emergent Abilities of Large Language Models
Wei, J., Tay, Y., Bommasani, R., Raffel, C., Zoph, B., Borgeaud, S., Yogatama, D., Bosma, M., Zhou, D., Metzler, D., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2206.07682 · Cited by 1,264
Learning To Retrieve Prompts for In-Context Learning
Rubin, O., Herzig, J., & Berant, J. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.naacl-main.191 · Cited by 374
A Survey on Multimodal Large Language Models for Autonomous Driving
Cui, C., Ma, Y., Cao, X., Ye, W., Zhou, Y., Liang, K., Chen, J., Lu, J., Yang, Z., Liao, K.-D., et al. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision Workshops (WACVW) · doi:10.1109/wacvw60836.2024.00106 · Cited by 369
When large language models meet personalization: perspectives of challenges and opportunities
Chen, J., Liu, Z., Huang, X., Wu, C., Liu, Q., Jiang, G., Pu, Y., Lei, Y., Chen, X., Wang, X., et al. (2024) · World Wide Web · doi:10.1007/s11280-024-01276-1 · Cited by 367
Large language models are few-shot clinical information extractors
Agrawal, M., Hegselmann, S., Lang, H., Kim, Y., & Sontag, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.130 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Min, S., Lyu, X., Holtzman, A., Artetxe, M., Lewis, M., Hajishirzi, H., & Zettlemoyer, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Meta (United States) (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- Pages
- 11048-11064
- arXiv
- 2202.12837
- OpenAlex
- W4385567149
- Cited by
- 752
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 135 · 2025: 227 · 2024: 179 · 2023: 191 · 2022: 20
- FWCI
- 85.30
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2044660)
- Office of Naval Research (N00014-18, N00014-18-1-2826, ONR-N00014, N00014)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Keywords
- in-context learning, demonstrations, large language models, label noise, input distribution, label space, GPT-3, classification tasks, multiple-choice tasks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
