PreprintCited by 57Advanced Neural Network ApplicationsVisual Attention and Saliency DetectionDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

DN-DETR: Accelerate DETR Training by Introducing Query DeNoising

Open access

Abstract

We present in this paper a novel denoising training method to speedup DETR (DEtection TRansformer) training and offer a deepened understanding of the slow convergence issue of DETR-like methods. We show that the slow convergence results from the instability of bipartite graph matching which causes inconsistent optimization goals in early training stages. To address this issue, except for the Hungarian loss, our method additionally feeds ground-truth bounding boxes with noises into Transformer decoder and trains the model to reconstruct the original boxes, which effectively reduces the bipartite graph matching difficulty and leads to a faster convergence. Our method is universal and can be easily plugged into any DETR-like methods by adding dozens of lines of code to achieve a remarkable improvement. As a result, our DN-DETR results in a remarkable improvement ($+1.9$AP) under the same setting and achieves the best result (AP $43.4$ and $48.6$ with $12$ and $50$ epochs of training respectively) among DETR-like methods with ResNet-$50$ backbone. Compared with the baseline under the same setting, DN-DETR achieves comparable performance with $50\%$ training epochs. Code is available at \url{https://github.com/FengLi-ust/DN-DETR}.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2203.01305

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DINO yields a +6.0 AP improvement over DN-DETR in 12 epochs.

    “yielding a significant improvement of +6.0AP and +2.7AP , respectively, compared to DN-DETR, the previous best DETR-like model.”

    From DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detection (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

  • DINO yields a +2.7 AP improvement over DN-DETR in 24 epochs.

    “yielding a significant improvement of +6.0AP and +2.7AP , respectively, compared to DN-DETR, the previous best DETR-like model.”

    From DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detection (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

  • The slow convergence problem in DETR is caused by the instability of bipartite matching.

    “It shows that the slow convergence problem in DETR is caused by the instability of bipartite matching.”

    From DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detection (2022) · cites this paper as [17]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Li, F., Zhang, H., Liu, S., Guo, J., Ni, L. M., & Zhang, L.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4221146420
Cited by
57
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
Keywords
DETR, training acceleration, bipartite matching, slow convergence, object detection, transformer decoder

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review