PreprintCited by 64Robot Manipulation and LearningReinforcement Learning in RoboticsSoft Robotics and Applications

Goal-conditioned dual-action imitation learning for dexterous dual-arm robot manipulation

Open access
Kim, Heecheol, Ohmura, Yoshiyuki, Kuniyoshi, Yasuo·2022·arXiv

Preprint — published as 10.1109/tro.2024.3372778

Abstract

Long-horizon dexterous robot manipulation of deformable objects, such as banana peeling, is a problematic task because of the difficulties in object modeling and a lack of knowledge about stable and dexterous manipulation skills. This paper presents a goal-conditioned dual-action (GC-DA) deep imitation learning (DIL) approach that can learn dexterous manipulation skills using human demonstration data. Previous DIL methods map the current sensory input and reactive action, which often fails because of compounding errors in imitation learning caused by the recurrent computation of actions. The method predicts reactive action only when the precise manipulation of the target object is required (local action) and generates the entire trajectory when precise manipulation is not required (global action). This dual-action formulation effectively prevents compounding error in the imitation learning using the trajectory-based global action while responding to unexpected changes in the target object during the reactive local action. The proposed method was tested in a real dual-arm robot and successfully accomplished the banana-peeling task. Data from this and related works are available at: https://sites.google.com/view/multi-task-fine.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2203.09749

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Existing systems for fine manipulation use expensive robots and high-end sensors for precise state estimation.

    “Existing systems for fine manipulation use expensive robots and high-end sensors for precise state estimation [30, 64, 33, 43].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, H., Ohmura, Y., & Kuniyoshi, Y.
Affiliations
The University of Tokyo (JP)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
Volume
40
Pages
2287-2305
ISSN
1552-3098 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392405809
Cited by
64
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 3
FWCI
9.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Transactions on Robotics (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (22H00528)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
Keywords
deep imitation learning, dexterous manipulation, dual-arm robot, deformable objects, compounding errors, human demonstrations, robotic manipulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review