Goal-conditioned dual-action imitation learning for dexterous dual-arm robot manipulation
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1109/tro.2024.3372778
Abstract
Long-horizon dexterous robot manipulation of deformable objects, such as banana peeling, is a problematic task because of the difficulties in object modeling and a lack of knowledge about stable and dexterous manipulation skills. This paper presents a goal-conditioned dual-action (GC-DA) deep imitation learning (DIL) approach that can learn dexterous manipulation skills using human demonstration data. Previous DIL methods map the current sensory input and reactive action, which often fails because of compounding errors in imitation learning caused by the recurrent computation of actions. The method predicts reactive action only when the precise manipulation of the target object is required (local action) and generates the entire trajectory when precise manipulation is not required (global action). This dual-action formulation effectively prevents compounding error in the imitation learning using the trajectory-based global action while responding to unexpected changes in the target object during the reactive local action. The proposed method was tested in a real dual-arm robot and successfully accomplished the banana-peeling task. Data from this and related works are available at: https://sites.google.com/view/multi-task-fine.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Existing systems for fine manipulation use expensive robots and high-end sensors for precise state estimation.
“Existing systems for fine manipulation use expensive robots and high-end sensors for precise state estimation [30, 64, 33, 43].”
From Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardware (2023) · cites this paper as [33]
Cites
Diffusion Policy: Visuomotor Policy Learning via Action Diffusion
Chi, C., Feng, S., Du, Y., Xu, Z., Cousineau, E., Burchfiel, B., & Song, S. (2023) · Robotics: Science and Systems XIX · doi:10.15607/rss.2023.xix.026 · Cited by 530 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardware
Zhao, T., Kumar, V., Levine, S., & Finn, C. (2023) · Robotics: Science and Systems XIX · doi:10.15607/rss.2023.xix.016 · Cited by 674 · see citing works
Learning Fine-Grained Bimanual Manipulation with Low-Cost Hardware
Zhao, T. Z., Kumar, V., Levine, S., & Finn, C. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2304.13705 · Cited by 673 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kim, H., Ohmura, Y., & Kuniyoshi, Y.
- Affiliations
- The University of Tokyo (JP)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 40
- Pages
- 2287-2305
- ISSN
- 1552-3098 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2203.09749
- OpenAlex
- W4392405809
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 20 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 9.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- IEEE Transactions on Robotics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (22H00528)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
- Keywords
- deep imitation learning, dexterous manipulation, dual-arm robot, deformable objects, compounding errors, human demonstrations, robotic manipulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review