Exploring Visual Prompts for Adapting Large-Scale Models
Open accessAbstract
We investigate the efficacy of visual prompting to adapt large-scale models in vision. Following the recent approach from prompt tuning and adversarial reprogramming, we learn a single image perturbation such that a frozen model prompted with this perturbation performs a new task. Through comprehensive experiments, we demonstrate that visual prompting is particularly effective for CLIP and robust to distribution shift, achieving performance competitive with standard linear probes. We further analyze properties of the downstream dataset, prompt design, and output transformation in regard to adaptation performance. The surprising effectiveness of visual prompting provides a new perspective on adapting pre-trained models in vision. Code is available at http://hjbahng.github.io/visual_prompting .
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Prompt learning methods can adapt pre-trained transformers to target domains by training very few parameters and achieve comparable performance with finetuning the whole heavy model.
“prompt learning methods [2,5,8,16,18,32,42] emerge recently as efficient and effective solutions for adapting pre-trained transformers to the target domain via only training very few parameters (i.e., prompts), and achieve comparable performance with finetuning the whole heavy model.”
From Multimodal Prompting with Missing Modalities for Visual Recognition (2023) · cites this paper as [2]
Cites
PTR: Prompt Tuning with Rules for Text Classification
Han, X., Zhao, W., Ding, N., Liu, Z., & Sun, M. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2105.11259 · Cited by 478 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Currently, prompting methods are dominantly NLP-specific [4, 40–42, 13, 30, 27, 36, 14, 48, 15, 26], despite the fact that the framework serves a general purpose: adapt a frozen pre-trained model by modifying the data space .”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Jia, M., Tang, L., Chen, B.-C., Cardie, C., Belongie, S., Hariharan, B., & Lim, S.-N. (2022) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19827-4_41 · Cited by 1,965 · see citing works
Vision-Language Models for Vision Tasks: A Survey
Zhang, J., Huang, J., Jin, S., & Lu, S. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2024.3369699 · Cited by 1,051 · see citing works
Multimodal Prompting with Missing Modalities for Visual Recognition
Lee, Y.-L., Tsai, Y.-H., Chiu, W.-C., & Lee, C.-Y. (2023) · 2023 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.01435 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
Exploring the Transferability of Visual Prompting for Multimodal Large Language Models
Zhang, Y., Dong, Y., Zhang, S., Min, T., Su, H., & Zhu, J. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.02508 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
- Authors
- Bahng, H., Jahanian, A., Sankaranarayanan, S., & Isola, P.
- Affiliations
- Moscow Institute of Thermal Technology (RU)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2203.17274
- OpenAlex
- W4281838252
- Cited by
- 129
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 58 · 2023: 34
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
- Keywords
- visual prompting, prompt tuning, image perturbation, CLIP, frozen pre-trained models, distribution shift, linear probing, prompt engineering, output transformation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
