CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 154Industrial Vision Systems and Defect DetectionAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

A Survey on Unsupervised Anomaly Detection Algorithms for Industrial Images

Open access
Cui, Yajie, Liu, Zhaoxiang, Lian, Shiguo·2022·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2204.11161arXiv 2204.11161
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

In line with the development of Industry 4.0, surface defect detection/anomaly detection becomes a topical subject in the industry field. Improving efficiency as well as saving labor costs has steadily become a matter of great concern in practice, where deep learning-based algorithms perform better than traditional vision inspection methods in recent years. While existing deep learning-based algorithms are biased towards supervised learning, which not only necessitates a huge amount of labeled data and human labor, but also brings about inefficiency and limitations. In contrast, recent research shows that unsupervised learning has great potential in tackling the above disadvantages for visual industrial anomaly detection. In this survey, we summarize current challenges and provide a thorough overview of recently proposed unsupervised algorithms for visual industrial anomaly detection covering five categories, whose innovation points and frameworks are described in detail. Meanwhile, publicly available datasets for industrial anomaly detection are introduced. By comparing different classes of methods, the advantages and disadvantages of anomaly detection algorithms are summarized. Based on the current research framework, we point out the core issue that remains to be resolved and provide further improvement directions. Meanwhile, based on the latest technological trends, we offer insights into future research directions. It is expected to assist both the research community and industry in developing a broader and cross-domain perspective.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2204.11161

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 170

  1. X. Fang, Q. Luo, B. Zhou, C. Li, and L. Tian, ''Research progress of automated visual surface defect detection for industrial metal planar materials,'' Sensors, vol. 20, no. 18, p. 5136, Sep. 2020.
  2. X. Xie, ''A review of recent advances in surface defect detection using texture analysis techniques,'' ELCVIA, Electron. Lett. Comput. Vis. Image Anal., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 1-22, 2008.
  3. T. Zhang, Y. Liu, Y. Yang, X. Wang, and Y. Jin, ''Review of surface defect detection based on machine vision,'' J. Sci. Technol. Eng., vol. 20, no. 35, pp. 14366-14376, 2020.
  4. J. Cao, G. Yang, and X. Yang, ''A pixel-level segmentation convolutional neural network based on deep feature fusion for surface defect detection,'' IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas., vol. 70, pp. 1-12, 2021.
  5. G. Pang, C. Shen, L. Cao, and A. V. D. Hengel, ''Deep learning for anomaly detection: A review,'' ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 1-38, Mar. 2021.
  6. L. Wang and P. Koniusz, ''Self-supervising action recognition by statis- tical moment and subspace descriptors,'' in Proc. 29th ACM Int. Conf. Multimedia, Oct. 2021, pp. 4324-4333.
  7. P. Koniusz, L. Wang, and A. Cherian, ''Tensor representations for action recognition,'' IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 648-665, Feb. 2022.
  8. L. Wang, D. Q. Huynh, and M. R. Mansour, ''Loss switching fusion with similarity search for video classification,'' in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Process. (ICIP), Sep. 2019, pp. 974-978.
  9. P.-H. Chen, Y.-C. Yang, and L.-M. Chang, ''Automated bridge coating defect recognition using adaptive ellipse approach,'' Autom. Construct., vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 632-643, Aug. 2009.
  10. S. Lee, L.-M. Chang, and M. Skibniewski, ''Automated recognition of surface defects using digital color image processing,'' Autom. Construct., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 540-549, Jul. 2006.
  11. R. Manish, A. Venkatesh, and S. D. Ashok, ''Machine vision based image processing techniques for surface finish and defect inspection in a grinding process,'' Mater. Today, Proc., vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 12792-12802, 2018.
  12. M. Chu, R. Gong, S. Gao, and J. Zhao, ''Steel surface defects recogni- tion based on multi-type statistical features and enhanced twin support vector machine,'' Chemometric Intell. Lab. Syst., vol. 171, pp. 140-150, Dec. 2017.
  13. H.-F. Ng, ''Automatic thresholding for defect detection,'' Pattern Recog- nit. Lett., vol. 27, no. 14, pp. 1644-1649, Oct. 2006.
  14. M. Aminzadeh and T. Kurfess, ''Automatic thresholding for defect detec- tion by background histogram mode extents,'' J. Manuf. Syst., vol. 37, pp. 83-92, Oct. 2015.
  15. J. Kumar, S. P. Srivastava, R. S. Anand, P. Arvind, S. Bhardwaj, and A. Thakur, ''GLCM and ANN based approach for classification of radio- graphics weld images,'' in Proc. IEEE 13th Int. Conf. Ind. Inf. Syst. (ICIIS), Dec. 2018, pp. 168-172.
  16. M. A. Shabir, M. U. Hassan, X. Yu, and J. Li, ''Tyre defect detection based on GLCM and Gabor filter,'' in Proc. 22nd Int. Multitopic Conf. (INMIC), Nov. 2019, pp. 1-6.
  17. S. Sadaghiyanfam, ''Using gray-level-co-occurrence matrix and wavelet transform for textural fabric defect detection: A comparison study,'' in Proc. Electr. Electron., Comput. Sci., Biomed. Eng. Meeting (EBBT), Apr. 2018, pp. 1-5.
  18. N. T. Deotale and T. K. Sarode, ''Fabric defect detection adopting com- bined GLCM, Gabor wavelet features and random decision forest,'' 3D Res., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1-13, Mar. 2019.
  19. X. YongHua and W. Jin-Cong, ''Study on the identification of the wood surface defects based on texture features,'' Optik Int. J. Light Electron Opt., vol. 126, no. 19, pp. 2231-2235, Oct. 2015.
  20. S.-W. Yang, C.-S. Lin, S.-K. Lin, and H.-T. Chiang, ''Automatic defect recognition of TFT array process using gray level co-occurrence matrix,'' Optik, vol. 125, no. 11, pp. 2671-2676, Jun. 2014.
  21. V. A. Sindagi and S. Srivastava, ''Domain adaptation for automatic OLED panel defect detection using adaptive support vector data description,'' Int. J. Comput. Vis., vol. 122, no. 2, pp. 193-211, Apr. 2017.
  22. K. Song and Y. Yan, ''A noise robust method based on completed local binary patterns for hot-rolled steel strip surface defects,'' Appl. Surf. Sci., vol. 285, pp. 858-864, Nov. 2013.
  23. S. Fekri-Ershad and F. Tajeripour, ''Multi-resolution and noise-resistant surface defect detection approach using new version of local binary patterns,'' Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 31, nos. 5-6, pp. 395-410, Jul. 2017.
  24. Z. Liu, L. Yan, C. Li, Y. Dong, and G. Gao, ''Fabric defect detection based on sparse representation of main local binary pattern,'' Int. J. Clothing Sci. Technol., vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 282-293, Jun. 2017.
  25. S. Li, D. Li, and W. Yuan, ''Wood defect classification based on two- dimensional histogram constituted by LBP and local binary differential excitation pattern,'' IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 145829-145842, 2019.
  26. K. Yan, Q. Dong, T. Sun, M. Zhang, and S. Zhang, ''Weld defect detection based on completed local ternary patterns,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Video Image Process., Dec. 2017, pp. 6-14.
  27. A. Chondronasios, I. Popov, and I. Jordanov, ''Feature selection for surface defect classification of extruded aluminum profiles,'' Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 83, nos. 1-4, pp. 33-41, Mar. 2016.
  28. R. Ma, S. Deng, H. Sun, and Y. Qi, ''An algorithm for fabric defect detection based on adaptive Canny operator,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Intell. Comput., Autom. Syst. (ICICAS), Dec. 2019, pp. 475-481.
  29. Y. Zhang, T. Li, and Q. Li, ''Defect detection for tire laser shearography image using curvelet transform based edge detector,'' Opt. Laser Technol., vol. 47, pp. 64-71, Apr. 2013.
  30. X. Hou and H. Liu, ''Welding image edge detection and identification research based on Canny operator,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Comput. Sci. Service Syst., Aug. 2012, pp. 250-253.
  31. M. Halim, ''Automatic laser welding defect detection and classification using sobel-contour shape detection,'' J. Telecommun., Electron. Comput. Eng. (JTEC), vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 157-160, 2016.
  32. C. Tastimur, M. Karaköse, E. Akin, and I. Aydin, ''Rail defect detection with real time image processing technique,'' in Proc. IEEE 14th Int. Conf. Ind. Informat. (INDIN), Jul. 2016, pp. 411-415.
  33. J. Zhang, Z. Guo, T. Jiao, and M. Wang, ''Defect detection of aluminum alloy wheels in radiography images using adaptive threshold and morpho- logical reconstruction,'' Appl. Sci., vol. 8, no. 12, p. 2365, Nov. 2018.
  34. J. Hu, Z. He, G. Weng, L. Sun, B. Zuo, and C. Wang, ''Detection of chemical fabric defects on the basis of morphological processing,'' J. Textile Inst., vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 233-241, Feb. 2016.
  35. V. Jayashree and S. Subbaramn, ''Hybrid approach using correlation and morphological approaches for GFDD of plain weave fabric,'' in Proc. IEEE Control Syst. Graduate Res. Colloq., Jul. 2012, pp. 197-202.
  36. A. Rebhi, S. Abid, and F. Fnaiech, ''Fabric defect detection using local homogeneity and morphological image processing,'' in Proc. Int. Image Process., Appl. Syst. (IPAS), Nov. 2016, pp. 1-5.
  37. T.-C. Su and M.-D. Yang, ''Application of morphological segmentation to leaking defect detection in sewer pipelines,'' Sensors, vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 8686-8704, May 2014.
  38. I. Pastor-López, B. Sanz, J. G. D. L. Puerta, and P. G. Bringas, ''Surface defect modelling using co-occurrence matrix and fast Fourier transforma- tion,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Hybrid Artif. Intell. Syst., 2019, pp. 745-757.
  39. X. Bai, Y. Fang, W. Lin, L. Wang, and B.-F. Ju, ''Saliency-based defect detection in industrial images by using phase spectrum,'' IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 2135-2145, Nov. 2014.
  40. P. Kumaresan, ''Defect detection in texture by Fourier analysis approach,'' Int. J. Eng., Sci. Math., vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 124-130, 2017.
  41. S. Ajithaprasad, R. Velpula, and R. Gannavarpu, ''Defect detection using windowed Fourier spectrum analysis in diffraction phase microscopy,'' J. Phys. Commun., vol. 3, no. 2, Feb. 2019, Art. no. 025006.
  42. G.-H. Hu, ''Automated defect detection in textured surfaces using optimal elliptical Gabor filters,'' Optik, vol. 126, no. 14, pp. 1331-1340, Jul. 2015.
  43. J.-W. Wang, W.-Y. Chen, and J.-S. Lee, ''Singular value decomposition combined with wavelet transform for lcd defect detection,'' Electron. Lett., vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 266-267, 2012.
  44. C. Yang, P. Liu, G. Yin, H. Jiang, and X. Li, ''Defect detection in magnetic tile images based on stationary wavelet transform,'' NDT E Int., vol. 83, pp. 78-87, Oct. 2016.
  45. J. Liu, G. Xu, L. Ren, Z. Qian, and L. Ren, ''Defect intelligent identifi- cation in resistance spot welding ultrasonic detection based on wavelet packet and neural network,'' Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 90, nos. 9-12, pp. 2581-2588, Jun. 2017.
  46. P. Li, H. Zhang, J. Jing, R. Li, and J. Zhao, ''Fabric defect detection based on multi-scale wavelet transform and Gaussian mixture model method,'' J. Textile Inst., vol. 106, no. 6, pp. 587-592, Jun. 2015.
  47. J. Jing, P. Yang, P. Li, and X. Kang, ''Supervised defect detection on textile fabrics via optimal Gabor filter,'' J. Ind. Textiles, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 40-57, Jul. 2014.
  48. L. Tong, W. K. Wong, and C. K. Kwong, ''Differential evolution-based optimal Gabor filter model for fabric inspection,'' Neurocomputing, vol. 173, pp. 1386-1401, Jan. 2016.
  49. X. Yang, D. Qi, and X. Li, ''Multi-scale edge detection of wood defect images based on the dyadic wavelet transform,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Vis. Hum. Mach. Interface, 2010, pp. 120-123.
  50. V. R. Vijaykumar and S. Sangamithirai, ''Rail defect detection using Gabor filters with texture analysis,'' in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Signal Pro- cess., Commun. Netw. (ICSCN), Mar. 2015, pp. 1-6.
  51. Y. Li, W. Zhao, and J. Pan, ''Deformable patterned fabric defect detection with Fisher criterion-based deep learning,'' IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 1256-1264, Apr. 2017.
  52. Y. Wang, M. Liu, P. Zheng, H. Yang, and J. Zou, ''A smart surface inspec- tion system using faster R-CNN in cloud-edge computing environment,'' Adv. Eng. Informat., vol. 43, Jan. 2020, Art. no. 101037.
  53. Y. T. Liu, Y. N. Yang, W. Chao, X. Y. Xu, and T. Zhang, ''Research on surface defect detection based on semantic segmentation,'' DEStech Trans. Comput. Sci. Eng., 2019.
  54. D. Weimer, B. Scholz-Reiter, and M. Shpitalni, ''Design of deep convo- lutional neural network architectures for automated feature extraction in industrial inspection,'' CIRP Ann., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 417-420, 2016.
  55. Y. Li and C. Zhang, ''Automated vision system for fabric defect inspection using Gabor filters and PCNN,'' SpringerPlus, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1-12, Dec. 2016.
  56. S. S. Kumar, D. M. Abraham, M. R. Jahanshahi, T. Iseley, and J. Starr, ''Automated defect classification in sewer closed circuit television inspec- tions using deep convolutional neural networks,'' Autom. Construct., vol. 91, pp. 273-283, Jul. 2018.
  57. D. Brackenbury, I. Brilakis, and M. DeJong, ''Automated defect detection for masonry arch bridges,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Smart Infrastruct. Con- struct. (ICSIC), Jan. 2019, pp. 3-9.
  58. C. Sacco et al., ''Automated fiber placement defects: Automated inspec- tion and characterization,'' in Proc. SAMPE Conf. Exhib., 2018.
  59. Y. Yang, L. Pan, J. Ma, R. Yang, Y. Zhu, Y. Yang, and L. Zhang, ''A high- performance deep learning algorithm for the automated optical inspection of laser welding,'' Appl. Sci., vol. 10, no. 3, p. 933, Jan. 2020.
  60. Y. Liu, J. Geng, Z. Su, W. Zhang, and J. Li, ''Real-time classification of steel strip surface defects based on deep CNNs,'' in Proc. Chin. Intell. Syst. Conf., 2019, pp. 257-266.
  61. L. Song, W. Lin, Y. Yang, X. Zhu, Q. Guo, and J. Xi, ''Weak micro-scratch detection based on deep convolutional neural network,'' IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 27547-27554, 2019.
  62. Y. Liu, K. Xu, and J. Xu, ''Periodic surface defect detection in steel plates based on deep learning,'' Appl. Sci., vol. 9, no. 15, p. 3127, Aug. 2019.
  63. R. F. Pereira, C. M. S. Medeiros, and P. P. R. Filho, ''Goat leather quality classification using computer vision and machine learning,'' in Proc. Int. Joint Conf. Neural Netw. (IJCNN), Jul. 2018, pp. 1-8.
  64. S. Tural and R. Samet, ''Automated defect detection on surface of Militarz cartridges,'' J. Mod. Technol. Eng., vol. 4, pp. 178-189, Jan. 2019.
  65. M. P. Samy, S. Foong, G. S. Soh, and K. S. Yeo, ''Automatic optical & laser-based defect detection and classification in brick masonry walls,'' in Proc. IEEE Region Conf. (TENCON), Nov. 2016, pp. 3521-3524.
  66. F. López, J.-M. Valiente, and J.-M. Prats, ''Surface grading using soft colour-texture descriptors,'' in Proc. Iberoamerican Congr. Pattern Recognit., 2005, pp. 13-23.
  67. F. López, J. M. Valiente, R. Baldrich, and M. Vanrell, ''Fast surface grading using color statistics in the cie lab space,'' in Proc. Iberian Conf. Pattern Recognit. Image Anal., 2005, pp. 666-673.
  68. F. Pernkopf, ''Detection of surface defects on raw steel blocks using Bayesian network classifiers,'' Pattern Anal. Appl., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 333-342, Dec. 2004.
  69. C. Mandriota, M. Nitti, N. Ancona, E. Stella, and A. Distante, ''Filter- based feature selection for rail defect detection,'' Mach. Vis. Appl., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 179-185, Oct. 2004.
  70. K. Wiltschi, A. Pinz, and T. Lindeberg, ''An automatic assessment scheme for steel quality inspection,'' Mach. Vis. Appl., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 113-128, Oct. 2000.
  71. C.-H. Chan and G. K. H. Pang, ''Fabric defect detection by Fourier analysis,'' IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl., vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 1267-1276, Sep./Oct. 2000.
  72. A. Latif-Amet, A. Ertüzün, and A. Erçil, ''An efficient method for texture defect detection: Sub-band domain co-occurrence matrices,'' Image Vis. Comput., vol. 18, nos. 6-7, pp. 543-553, May 2000.
  73. R. Wang, K. Nie, Y. Chang, X. Gong, T. Wang, Y. Yang, and B. Long, ''Deep learning for anomaly detection,'' in Proc. KDD, 2020, pp. 3569-3570.
  74. Y. Gao, X. Li, X. V. Wang, L. Wang, and L. Gao, ''A review on recent advances in vision-based defect recognition towards industrial intelli- gence,'' J. Manuf. Syst., vol. 62, pp. 753-766, Jan. 2022.
  75. X. Zheng, S. Zheng, Y. Kong, and J. Chen, ''Recent advances in surface defect inspection of industrial products using deep learning techniques,'' Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 113, nos. 1-2, pp. 35-58, Mar. 2021.
  76. J. Yang, R. Xu, Z. Qi, and Y. Shi, ''Visual anomaly detection for images: A systematic survey,'' Proc. Comput. Sci., vol. 199, pp. 471-478, Jan. 2022.
  77. T. Czimmermann, G. Ciuti, M. Milazzo, M. Chiurazzi, S. Roccella, C. M. Oddo, and P. Dario, ''Visual-based defect detection and classi- fication approaches for industrial applications-A SURVEY,'' Sensors, vol. 20, no. 5, p. 1459, Mar. 2020.
  78. S. Qi, J. Yang, and Z. Zhong, ''A review on industrial surface defect detection based on deep learning technology,'' in Proc. 3rd Int. Conf.
  79. Mach. Learn. Mach. Intell., Sep. 2020, pp. 24-30.
  80. A. Rasheed, B. Zafar, A. Rasheed, N. Ali, M. Sajid, S. H. Dar, U. Habib, T. Shehryar, and M. T. Mahmood, ''Fabric defect detection using com- puter vision techniques: A comprehensive review,'' Math. Problems Eng., vol. 2020, pp. 1-24, Nov. 2020.
  81. P. M. Bhatt, R. K. Malhan, P. Rajendran, B. C. Shah, S. Thakar, Y. J. Yoon, and S. K. Gupta, ''Image-based surface defect detection using deep learning: A review,'' J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng., vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 1-23, Aug. 2021.
  82. M. Salehi, H. Mirzaei, D. Hendrycks, Y. Li, M. Hossein Rohban, and M. Sabokrou, ''A unified survey on anomaly, novelty, open-set, and out-of-distribution detection: Solutions and future challenges,'' 2021, arXiv:2110.14051. · arXiv
  83. X. Xia, X. Pan, N. Li, X. He, L. Ma, X. Zhang, and N. Ding, ''GAN-based anomaly detection: A review,'' Neurocomputing, vol. 493, pp. 497-535, Jul. 2022.
  84. N. Goernitz, M. Kloft, K. Rieck, and U. Brefeld, ''Toward supervised anomaly detection,'' J. Artif. Intell. Res., vol. 46, pp. 235-262, Feb. 2013.
  85. Y. Kawachi, Y. Koizumi, and N. Harada, ''Complementary set variational autoencoder for supervised anomaly detection,'' in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Acoust., Speech Signal Process. (ICASSP), Apr. 2018, pp. 2366-2370.
  86. L. Ruff, J. R. Kauffmann, R. A. Vandermeulen, G. Montavon, W. Samek, M. Kloft, T. G. Dietterich, and K. Müller, ''A unifying review of deep and shallow anomaly detection,'' Proc. IEEE, vol. 109, no. 5, pp. 756-795, May 2021.
  87. S. Venkataramanan, K.-C. Peng, R. V. Singh, and A. Mahalanobis, ''Attention guided anomaly localization in images,'' in Proc. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis., Nov. 2020, pp. 485-503.
  88. Y. Liu, C. Zhuang, and F. Lu, ''Unsupervised two-stage anomaly detec- tion,'' 2021, arXiv:2103.11671. · arXiv
  89. J. Yang, Y. Shi, and Z. Qi, ''DFR: Deep feature reconstruction for unsu- pervised anomaly segmentation,'' 2020, arXiv:2012.07122. · arXiv
  90. M. Zolfaghari and H. Sajedi, ''Unsupervised anomaly detection with an enhanced teacher for student-teacher feature pyramid matching,'' in Proc. 27th Int. Comput. Conf., Comput. Soc. Iran (CSICC), Feb. 2022, pp. 1-4.
  91. S. Yamada, S. Kamiya, and K. Hotta, ''Reconstructed student-teacher and discriminative networks for anomaly detection,'' in Proc. IEEE/RSJ Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst. (IROS), Oct. 2022, pp. 2725-2732.
  92. H. Deng and X. Li, ''Anomaly detection via reverse distillation from one-class embedding,'' in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Jun. 2022, pp. 9727-9736.
  93. M. Rudolph, T. Wehrbein, B. Rosenhahn, and B. Wandt, ''Asym- metric student-teacher networks for industrial anomaly detection,'' in Proc. IEEE/CVF Winter Conf. Appl. Comput. Vis. (WACV), Jan. 2023, pp. 2591-2601.
  94. F. V. Massoli, F. Falchi, A. Kantarci, Ş. Akti, H. K. Ekenel, and G. Amato, ''MOCCA: Multi-layer one-class ClassificAtion for anomaly detection,'' 2020, arXiv:2012.12111. · arXiv
  95. Y. Liang, J. Zhang, S. Zhao, R. Wu, Y. Liu, and S. Pan, ''Omni-frequency channel-selection representations for unsupervised anomaly detection,'' 2022, arXiv:2203.00259. · arXiv
  96. P. Mishra, R. Verk, D. Fornasier, C. Piciarelli, and G. L. Foresti, ''VT- ADL: A vision transformer network for image anomaly detection and localization,'' in Proc. IEEE 30th Int. Symp. Ind. Electron. (ISIE), Jun. 2021, pp. 01-06.
  97. N. Li, K. Jiang, Z. Ma, X. Wei, X. Hong, and Y. Gong, ''Anomaly detec- tion via self-organizing map,'' in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Process. (ICIP), Sep. 2021, pp. 974-978.
  98. M. Rudolph, B. Wandt, and B. Rosenhahn, ''Same same but DifferNet: Semi-supervised defect detection with normalizing flows,'' in Proc. IEEE Winter Conf. Appl. Comput. Vis. (WACV), Jan. 2021, pp. 1906-1915.
  99. D. Gudovskiy, S. Ishizaka, and K. Kozuka, ''CFLOW-AD: Real-time unsupervised anomaly detection with localization via conditional nor- malizing flows,'' in Proc. IEEE/CVF Winter Conf. Appl. Comput. Vis. (WACV), Jan. 2022, pp. 1819-1828.
  100. M. Rudolph, T. Wehrbein, B. Rosenhahn, and B. Wandt, ''Fully convolutional cross-scale-flows for image-based defect detection,'' in Proc. IEEE/CVF Winter Conf. Appl. Comput. Vis. (WACV), Jan. 2022, pp. 1829-1838.
  101. J. Yu, Y. Zheng, X. Wang, W. Li, Y. Wu, R. Zhao, and L. Wu, ''FastFlow: Unsupervised anomaly detection and localization via 2D normalizing flows,'' 2021, arXiv:2111.07677. · arXiv
  102. N. Cohen and Y. Hoshen, ''Sub-image anomaly detection with deep pyramid correspondences,'' 2020, arXiv:2005.02357. · arXiv
  103. T. Defard, A. Setkov, A. Loesch, and R. Audigier, ''PaDiM: A patch dis- tribution modeling framework for anomaly detection and localization,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Pattern Recognit., 2021, pp. 475-489.
  104. K. Roth, L. Pemula, J. Zepeda, B. Schölkopf, T. Brox, and P. Gehler, ''Towards total recall in industrial anomaly detection,'' in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Jun. 2022, pp. 14298-14308.
  105. S. Wang, L. Wu, L. Cui, and Y. Shen, ''Glancing at the patch: Anomaly localization with global and local feature comparison,'' in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Jun. 2021, pp. 254-263.
  106. Y. Zheng, X. Wang, R. Deng, T. Bao, R. Zhao, and L. Wu, ''Focus your distribution: Coarse-to-fine non-contrastive learning for anomaly detection and localization,'' in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Multimedia Expo. (ICME), Jul. 2022, pp. 1-6.
  107. O. Rippel, P. Mertens, and D. Merhof, ''Modeling the distribution of normal data in pre-trained deep features for anomaly detection,'' in Proc. 25th Int. Conf. Pattern Recognit. (ICPR), Jan. 2021, pp. 6726-6733.
  108. J. Yi and S. Yoon, ''Patch SVDD: Patch-level SVDD for anomaly detection and segmentation,'' in Proc. Asian Conf. Comput. Vis., 2020, pp. 375-390.
  109. K. Sohn, C. L. Li, J. Yoon, M. Jin, and T. Pfister, ''Learning and evaluating representations for deep one-class classification,'' 2020, arXiv:2011.02578. · arXiv
  110. J.-H. Kim, D.-H. Kim, S. Yi, and T. Lee, ''Semi-orthogonal embedding for efficient unsupervised anomaly segmentation,'' 2021, arXiv:2105.14737. · arXiv
  111. S. Lee, S. Lee, and B. C. Song, ''CFA: Coupled-hypersphere-based fea- ture adaptation for target-oriented anomaly localization,'' IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 78446-78454, 2022.
  112. V. Zavrtanik, M. Kristan, and D. Skocaj, ''DRÆM-A discrimina- tively trained reconstruction embedding for surface anomaly detec- tion,'' in Proc. IEEE/CVF Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. (ICCV), Oct. 2021, pp. 8330-8339.
  113. H. M. Schlüter, J. Tan, B. Hou, and B. Kainz, ''Natural synthetic anomalies for self-supervised anomaly detection and localization,'' 2021, arXiv:2109.15222. · arXiv
  114. C. Li, K. Sohn, J. Yoon, and T. Pfister, ''CutPaste: Self-supervised learn- ing for anomaly detection and localization,'' in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Jun. 2021, pp. 9659-9669.
  115. N. Ristea, N. Madan, R. T. Ionescu, K. Nasrollahi, F. S. Khan, T. B. Moeslund, and M. Shah, ''Self-supervised predictive convolutional attentive block for anomaly detection,'' in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Com- put. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Jun. 2022, pp. 13566-13576.
  116. J. Song, K. Kong, Y.-I. Park, S.-G. Kim, and S.-J. Kang, ''AnoSeg: Anomaly segmentation network using self-supervised learning,'' 2021, arXiv:2110.03396. · arXiv
  117. Y. LeCun, ''Generalization and network design strategies,'' Connection- ism Perspective, vol. 19, pp. 143-155, Jun. 1989.
  118. M. Rudolph, B. Wandt, and B. Rosenhahn, ''Structuring autoen- coders,'' in Proc. IEEE/CVF Int. Conf. Comput. Vis. Workshop (ICCVW), Oct. 2019, pp. 615-623.
  119. D. P. Kingma and M. Welling, ''Auto-encoding variational Bayes,'' 2013, arXiv:1312.6114. · arXiv
  120. I. J. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. C. Courville, and Y. Bengio, ''Generative adversarial net- works,'' 2014, arXiv:1406.2661. · arXiv
  121. D. J. Rezende and S. Mohamed, ''Variational inference with normal- izing flows,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. (ICML), vol. 37, 2015, pp. 1530-1538.
  122. X. Wang, K. Wang, and S. Lian, ''A survey on face data augmentation for the training of deep neural networks,'' Neural Comput. Appl., vol. 32, pp. 15503-15531, Mar. 2020.
  123. N. Ishida, Y. Nagatsu, and H. Hashimoto, ''Unsupervised anomaly detec- tion based on data augmentation and mixing,'' in Proc. IECON 46th Annu. Conf. IEEE Ind. Electron. Soc., Oct. 2020, pp. 529-533.
  124. Y. Chen, Y. Tian, G. Pang, and G. Carneiro, ''Deep one-class classifica- tion via interpolated Gaussian descriptor,'' in AAAI, 2022, pp. 383-392.
  125. P. Liznerski, L. Ruff, R. A. Vandermeulen, B. J. Franks, M. Kloft, and K. R. Müller, ''Explainable deep one-class classification,'' arXiv:2007.01760, 2020. · arXiv
  126. T. Reiss and Y. Hoshen, ''Mean-shifted contrastive loss for anomaly detection,'' 2021, arXiv:2106.03844. · arXiv
  127. D. M. J. Tax and R. P. W. Duin, ''Support vector data description,'' Mach. Learn., vol. 54, no. 1, pp. 45-66, Jan. 2004.
  128. L. Ruff, R. Vandermeulen, N. Goernitz, L. Deecke, S. A. Siddiqui, A. Binder, E. Müller, and M. Kloft, ''Deep one-class classification,'' in Proc. ICML, 2018, pp. 4393-4402.
  129. J. Pirnay and K. Chai, ''Inpainting transformer for anomaly detection,'' in Image Analysis and Processing-ICIAP 2022: 21st International Con- ference, Lecce, Italy, May 23-27, 2022, Proceedings, Part II. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, 2022.
  130. A. M. Kamoona, A. K. Gostar, A. Bab-Hadiashar, and R. Hoseinnezhad, ''Anomaly detection of defect using energy of point pattern features within random finite set framework,'' 2021, arXiv:2108.12159. · arXiv
  131. G. E. Hinton and R. R. Salakhutdinov, ''Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks,'' Science, vol. 313, no. 5786, pp. 504-507, Jul. 2006.
  132. P. Bergmann, S. Löwe, M. Fauser, D. Sattlegger, and C. Steger, ''Improv- ing unsupervised defect segmentation by applying structural similarity to autoencoders,'' in Proc. 14th Int. Joint Conf. Comput. Vis., Imag. Comput. Graph. Theory Appl., 2019, pp. 372-380.
  133. X. Yao, C. Zhang, and R. Li, ''Explicit boundary guided semi- push-pull contrastive learning for better anomaly detection,'' 2022, arXiv:2207.01463. · arXiv
  134. S. Deitsch, V. Christlein, S. Berger, C. Buerhop-Lutz, A. Maier, F. Gallwitz, and C. Riess, ''Automatic classification of defective pho- tovoltaic module cells in electroluminescence images,'' Sol. Energy, vol. 185, pp. 455-468, Jun. 2019.
  135. C. Buerhop-Lutz, S. Deitsch, A. Maier, F. Gallwitz, S. Berger, B. Doll, J. Hauch, C. Camus, and C. J. Brabec, ''A benchmark for visual identifi- cation of defective solar cells in electroluminescence imagery,'' in Proc. Eur. PV Sol. Energy Conf. Exhib. (EU PVSEC), 2018, pp. 1287-1289.
  136. S. Deitsch, C. Buerhop-Lutz, E. Sovetkin, A. Steland, A. Maier, F. Gallwitz, and C. Riess, ''Segmentation of photovoltaic module cells in uncalibrated electroluminescence images,'' Mach. Vis. Appl., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 32-84, 2021.
  137. J. Silvestre-Blanes, T. Albero-Albero, I. Miralles, R. Pérez-Llorens, and J. Moreno, ''A public fabric database for defect detection methods and results,'' Autex Res. J., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 363-374, Dec. 2019.
  138. M. Salehi, N. Sadjadi, S. Baselizadeh, M. H. Rohban, and H. R. Rabiee, ''Multiresolution knowledge distillation for anomaly detection,'' in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Jun. 2021, pp. 14897-14907.
  139. G. Pang, C. Ding, C. Shen, and A. van den Hengel, ''Explainable deep few-shot anomaly detection with deviation networks,'' 2021, arXiv:2108.00462. · arXiv
  140. T. Lin, P. Goyal, R. Girshick, K. He, and P. Dollár, ''Focal loss for dense object detection,'' IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 318-327, Feb. 2020.
  141. J. Tack, S. Mo, J. Jeong, and J. Shin, ''CSI: Novelty detection via contrastive learning on distributionally shifted instances,'' in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 33, 2020, pp. 11839-11852.
  142. W. Liu, W. Luo, Z. Li, P. Zhao, and S. Gao, ''Margin learning embedded prediction for video anomaly detection with a few anomalies,'' in Proc. 28th Int. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell., Aug. 2019, pp. 3023-3030.
  143. C. Ding, G. Pang, and C. Shen, ''Catching both gray and black swans: Open-set supervised anomaly detection,'' in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Com- put. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Jun. 2022, pp. 7378-7388.
  144. Y. Huang, C. Qiu, and K. Yuan, ''Surface defect saliency of magnetic tile,'' Vis. Comput., vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 85-96, Jan. 2020.
  145. I. Golan and R. El-Yaniv, ''Deep anomaly detection using geometric transformations,'' in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 31, 2018.
  146. S. Akcay, A. Atapour-Abarghouei, and T. P. Breckon, ''GANomaly: Semi-supervised anomaly detection via adversarial training,'' in Proc. Asian Conf. Comput. Vis., 2018, pp. 622-637.
  147. S. Zhai, Y. Cheng, W. Lu, and Z. Zhang, ''Deep structured energy based models for anomaly detection,'' in Proc. ICML, 2016, pp. 1100-1109.
  148. T. S. Nazare, R. F. de Mello, and M. A. Ponti, ''Are pre-trained CNNs good feature extractors for anomaly detection in surveillance videos?'' 2018, arXiv:1811.08495. · arXiv
  149. H. Cheng, H. Liu, F. Gao, and Z. Chen, ''ADGAN: A scalable GAN- based architecture for image anomaly detection,'' in Proc. IEEE 4th Inf. Technol., Netw., Electron. Autom. Control Conf. (ITNEC), vol. 1, Jun. 2020, pp. 987-993.
  150. J. Andrews et al., ''Transfer representation-learning for anomaly detec- tion,'' JMLR, 2016.
  151. D. Tabernik, S. Šela, J. Skvarč, and D. Skočaj, ''Segmentation-based deep-learning approach for surface-defect detection,'' J. Intell. Manuf., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 759-776, May 2019.
  152. S. Akçay, A. Atapour-Abarghouei, and T. P. Breckon, ''Skip-GANomaly: Skip connected and adversarially trained encoder-decoder anomaly detection,'' in Proc. Int. Joint Conf. Neural Netw. (IJCNN), Jul. 2019, pp. 1-8.
  153. M. Salehi, A. Eftekhar, N. Sadjadi, M. Hossein Rohban, and H. R. Rabiee, ''Puzzle-AE: Novelty detection in images through solving puzzles,'' 2020, arXiv:2008.12959. · arXiv
  154. P. Bergmann, M. Fauser, D. Sattlegger, and C. Steger, ''Uninformed students: Student-teacher anomaly detection with discriminative latent embeddings,'' in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Jun. 2020, pp. 4182-4191.
  155. T. Schlegl, P. Seeböck, S. M. Waldstein, G. Langs, and U. Schmidt-Erfurth, ''F-AnoGAN: Fast unsupervised anomaly detection with generative adversarial networks,'' Med. Image Anal., vol. 54, pp. 30-44, May 2019.
  156. B. Staar, M. Lütjen, and M. Freitag, ''Anomaly detection with convo- lutional neural networks for industrial surface inspection,'' Proc. CIRP, vol. 79, pp. 484-489, Jan. 2019.
  157. M. Wieler and T. Hahn, ''Weakly supervised learning for industrial optical inspection,'' in Proc. DAGM Symp., 2007.
  158. P. Bergmann, M. Fauser, D. Sattlegger, and C. Steger, ''MVTec AD- A comprehensive real-world dataset for unsupervised anomaly detec- tion,'' in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Jun. 2019, pp. 9584-9592.
  159. A. Makhzani, J. Shlens, N. Jaitly, I. Goodfellow, and B. Frey, ''Adversarial autoencoders,'' 2015, arXiv:1511.05644. · arXiv
  160. R. Bommasani, ''On the opportunities and risks of foundation models,'' 2021, arXiv:2108.07258. · arXiv
  161. K. He, X. Chen, S. Xie, Y. Li, P. Dollár, and R. Girshick, ''Masked autoencoders are scalable vision learners,'' in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Jun. 2022, pp. 15979-15988.
  162. T. Xi, ''UFO: Unified feature optimization,'' in Proc. Eur. Conf. Comput. Vis. Tel Aviv, Israel: Springer, Oct. 2022, pp. 472-488.
  163. C. Riquelme, J. Puigcerver, B. Mustafa, M. Neumann, R. Jenatton, A. S. Pinto, D. Keysers, and N. Houlsby, ''Scaling vision with sparse mixture of experts,'' in Proc. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., Annu. Conf. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NeurIPS), vol. 34, Dec. 2021, pp. 8583-8595.
  164. OpenAI, ''GPT-4 technical report,'' 2023, arXiv:2303.08774. · arXiv
  165. A. Radford, ''Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., 2021, pp. 8748-8763.
  166. R. Rombach, A. Blattmann, D. Lorenz, P. Esser, and B. Ommer, ''High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models,'' in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), Jun. 2022, pp. 10674-10685.
  167. A. Kirillov, E. Mintun, N. Ravi, H. Mao, C. Rolland, L. Gustafson, T. Xiao, S. Whitehead, A. C. Berg, W.-Y. Lo, P. Dollár, and R. Girshick, ''Segment anything,'' 2023, arXiv:2304.02643. · arXiv
  168. P. Wang, A. Yang, R. Men, J. Lin, S. Bai, Z. Li, J. Ma, C. Zhou, J. Zhou, and H. Yang, ''OFA: Unifying architectures, tasks, and modalities through a simple sequence-to-sequence learning framework,'' in Proc. Int. Conf. Mach. Learn., 2022, pp. 23318-23340.
  169. J. Lu, C. Clark, R. Zellers, R. Mottaghi, and A. Kembhavi, ''Unified- IO: A unified model for vision, language, and multi-modal tasks,'' 2022, arXiv:2206.08916. · arXiv
  170. SHIGUO LIAN (Member, IEEE) received the Ph.D. degree from the Nanjing University of Sci- ence and Technology, China. He was a Research Assistant with the City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, in 2004.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cui, Y., Liu, Z., & Lian, S.
Affiliations
China United Network Communications Group (China) (CN)
ORCID
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
Volume
11
Pages
55297-55315
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2204.11161
arXiv
2204.11161
OpenAlex
W4379470918
Cited by
154
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 3
FWCI
20.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
Keywords
unsupervised anomaly detection, surface defect detection, image anomaly detection, deep learning anomaly detection, Industry 4.0, image-based inspection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review