CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 8AI-based Problem Solving and PlanningPsychiatry, Mental Health, NeuroscienceCognitive Computing and Networks

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Introduction to Soar

Open access
Laird, John E.·2022·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2205.03854arXiv 2205.03854
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

This paper is the recommended initial reading for a functional overview of Soar, version 9.6. It includes an abstract overview of the architectural structure of Soar including its processing, memories, learning modules, their interfaces, and the representations of knowledge used by those modules. From there it describes the processing supported by those modules, including decision making, impasses and substates, procedure learning via chunking, reinforcement learning, semantic memory, episodic memory, and spatial-visual reasoning. It then reviews the levels of decision making and variety of learning in Soar, and analysis of Soar as an architecture supporting general human-level AI. Following the references is an appendix that contains short descriptions of recent Soar agents and a glossary of the terminology we use in describing Soar.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2205.03854

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Production systems were incorporated into cognitive architectures that specified control flow for selecting, applying, and even generating new productions.

    “To do so, they were incorporated into cognitive architectures that specified control flow for selecting, applying, and even generating new productions (Laird et al., 1987; Laird, 2022; Kotseruba and Tsotsos, 2020).”

    From Cognitive Architectures for Language Agents (2023) · cites this paper as Laird, 2022

    Section 2 (p. 4) describes Soar as a cognitive architecture in which rules contribute to selecting and applying operators, and Section 4 (p. 9) says chunking generates new rules. But the claim says the architecture selects and applies productions: Section 2 explicitly distinguishes Soar from systems that select and fire individual rules. In Soar, matching rules fire in parallel while operators are selected and applied. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 52

  1. Anderson, J. R. (2007) How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe? Oxford University Press.
  2. Anderson, J. R., Bothell, D., Byrne, M.D., Douglass, S., Lebiere, C., Qin, Y. (2004) An integrated theory of Mind. Psychological Review, 11,1, 1036-1060.
  3. Assanie, M. (2022) Learning General and Correct Procedural Knowledge in a Cognitive Architecture, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.
  4. Cox, M., Alavi, Z., Dannenhauer, D., Eyorokon, V., Munoz-Avila, H. (2016) MIDCA: A Metacognitive, Integrated Dual-Cycle Architecture for Self-Regulated Autonomy. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
  5. Davis, E. and Marcus, G., (2015) Commonsense Reasoning and Commonsense Knowledge in Artificial Intelligence, Communications of the ACM, 9, 92-103.
  6. Derbinsky, N., Laird, J. E., Smith, B. (2010) Towards Efficiently Supporting Large Symbolic Declarative Memories, Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, Philadelphia, PA.
  7. Derbinsky, N., Li, J., Laird, J. E. (2012) A Multi-Domain Evaluation of Scaling in a General Episodic Memory. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 2012.
  8. Forbus, K. D., De Kleer, J. (1993) Building Problem Solvers . MIT Press.
  9. Jones, R. M., Laird, J. E., Nielsen P. E., Coulter, K., Kenny, P., Koss, F. (1999) Automated Intelligent Pilots for Combat Flight Simulation, AI Magazine, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 27-42.
  10. Jones, S., Laird, J. E. (2019) Anticipatory Thinking in Cognitive Architectures with Event Cognition Mechanisms, COGSAT@ AAAI Fall Symposium.
  11. Jones, S. J., Wandzel, A. R., Laird, J. E. (2016) Efficient Computation of Spreading Activation Using Lazy Evaluation. Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (ICCM). University Park, Pennsylvania.
  12. Huffman, S.B., Laird, J. E. (1995) Flexibly Instructable Agents. In Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 3, 271-324.
  13. Kirk, J. (2019) Learning Hierarchical Compositional Task Definitions through Online Situated Interactive Language Instruction. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.
  14. Kosslyn, S. M., Thompson, W. L., Ganis, G. (2006) The Case for Mental Imagery. New York, New York: Oxford University Press.
  15. Kotseruba, I., Tsotsos, J.K. (2020) 40 years of Cognitive Architectures: Core Cognitive Abilities and Practical Applications. Artificial Intelligence Review 53, 17-94.
  16. Laird, J. E. (2001) It knows what you're going to do: Adding Anticipation to a Quakebots, Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents.
  17. Laird, J. E. (2008) Extending the Soar Cognitive Architecture. In Proceedings of the First Conference on Artificial General Intelligence (AGI-08).
  18. Laird, J. E. (2012) The Soar Cognitive Architecture. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  19. Laird, J. E., Derbinsky, N. Tinkerhess, M. (2011) A Case Study in Integrating Probabilistic Decision Making and Learning in a Symbolic Cognitive Architecture: Soar Plays Dice. Papers from the 2011 AAAI Fall Symposium Series: Advances in Cognitive Systems. Arlington, VA
  20. Laird, J. E., Rosenbloom, P.S. (1996) The Evolution of the Soar Cognitive Architecture. In T. Mitchell (ed.) Mind Matters, 1-50.
  21. Laird, J. E., Xu, J. Z., Wintermute, S. (2010) Using Diverse Cognitive Mechanisms for Action Modeling. Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, Philadelphia, PA.
  22. Langley, P., Laird, J. E., Rogers, S. (2009) Cognitive architectures: Research issues and challenges. Cognitive Systems Research, 10(2), 141-160.
  23. Lathrop, S.D., Laird, J.E. (2007) Towards Incorporating Visual Imagery into a Cognitive Architecture. Eighth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling.
  24. Lehman, J. F., Laird, J. E., Rosenbloom, P. (2006) A Gentle Introduction to Soar, An Architecture for Human Cognition: 2006 Update. (A revision of the original paper published in Sternberg & Scarborough (Eds) (1996) An Invitation to Cognitive Science. Vol. 4, MIT Press.)
  25. Li, J. (2016) The Goal Re-activation Problem in Cognitive Architectures. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.
  26. Li, J., Laird, J. E. (2015) Spontaneous Retrieval for Prospective Memory: Effects of Encoding Specificity and Retention Interval. Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Cognitive Modeling (ICCM). Groningen, The Netherlands.
  27. Lindes, Peter. (2022) Constructing Meaning, Piece by Piece: A Computational Cognitive Model of Human Sentence Comprehension, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan.
  28. Lindes, P., Mininger, A., Kirk, J., Laird, J. E. (2017) Grounding Language for Interactive Task Learning. Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Language Grounding for Robotics at ACL.
  29. Marinier, R. P., Laird, J. E., Lewis, R. L., (2009) A Computational Unification of Cognitive Behavior and Emotion, Cognitive Systems Research, 10(1), 48-69.
  30. Mininger, A. (2021) Expanding Task Diversity in Explanation-Based Interactive Task Learning. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.
  31. Mininger, A., Laird, J. E. (2022) A Demonstration of Compositional, Hierarchical Interactive Task Learning, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
  32. Mohan, S. (2015) From Verbs to Tasks: An Integrated Account of Learning Tasks from Situated Interactive Instruction. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan.
  33. Mohan, S., Laird, J. (2014) Learning Goal-Oriented Hierarchical Tasks from Situated Interactive Instruction. Proceedings of the 27th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
  34. Nason, S., Laird, J. E. (2005) Soar-RL: Integrating reinforcement learning with Soar. Cognitive Systems Research, 6(1), 51-59.
  35. Nelson, G., Lehman, J. F., John, B. (1994) Integrating cognitive capabilities in a real-time task. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 658-663.
  36. Newell, A. (1990) Unified Theories of Cognition. Harvard University Press.
  37. Newell, A. (1991) Reasoning, Problem Solving, and Decision Processes: The Problem Space as a Fundamental Category. Nickerson¸ N. (Ed.), Attention and Performance VIII , 693-718. Erlbaum.
  38. Pearson, D. J., Laird, J. E. (1995). Toward Incremental Knowledge Correction for Agents in Complex Environments. In S. Muggleton, D. Michie, and K. Furakawa (Ed.), Machine Intelligence. Oxford University Press.
  39. Rosenbloom, P. S., Demski, A., Ustun, V. (2016) The Sigma cognitive architecture and system: Towards functionally elegant grand unification. Journal of Artificial General Intelligence, 7, 1-103.
  40. Rosenbloom, P. S., Laird, J. E., Newell, A. (1986) Meta-levels in Soar. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Meta-level Architecture and Reflection, Sardina.
  41. Rosenbloom, P. S., Laird, J. E., Newell, A. (1993) The Soar Papers: Research on Integrated Intelligence. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
  42. Schatz, J., Jones, S. J., Laird, J. E. (2022) Modeling the Remote Associates Test as Retrievals from Semantic Memory, Cognitive Science Journal.
  43. Steier, D.S., Laird, J.E., Newell, A., Rosenbloom, P.S., Flynn, R., Golding, A., Polk, T.A., Shivers, O., Unruh, A., Yost, G.R. (1987) Varieties of Learning in Soar. Proceedings of the Fourth International Machine Learning Workshop.
  44. Stearns, B. (2021) A Comprehensive Computational Model of PRIMs Theory for Task-Independent Procedural Learning . Ph.D. Thesis, University of Michigan.
  45. Stearns, B., Assanie, M., Laird, J. E. (2017) Applying Primitive Elements Theory For Procedural Transfer in Soar. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Cognitive Modelling (ICCM). Warwick, UK.
  46. Sun, R. (2016) Anatomy of the Mind: Exploring Psychological Mechanisms and Processes with the Clarion Cognitive Architecture. Oxford University Press.
  47. Sutton, R.S., Barto, A. G. (2018) Reinforcement learning: An introduction, MIT Press.
  48. Taatgen, N. A. (2013) The Nature and Transfer of Cognitive Skills. Psychological Review, 120(3), 439471.
  49. Tulving, E. (1983) Elements of Episodic Memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  50. Wang, Y., and Laird, J.E. (2007) The Importance of Action History in Decision Making and Reinforcement Learning. Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling . Ann Arbor, MI.
  51. Wintermute, S. (2010) Using Imagery to Simplify Perceptual Abstraction in Reinforcement Learning Agents. Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
  52. Wray, R. E., Laird, J. E., Nuxoll, A., Stokes, D., Kerfoot, A. (2005) Synthetic adversaries for urban combat training. AI Magazine, 26(3), 82-92.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Cognitive Architectures for Language Agents

    Sumers, T. R., Yao, S., Narasimhan, K., & Griffiths, T. L. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.02427 · Cited by 72

    “To do so, they were incorporated into cognitive architectures that specified control flow for selecting, applying, and even generating new productions (Laird et al., 1987; Laird, 2022; Figure 1: Different uses of large language models (LLMs).”
    Background

Metadata

Authors
Laird, J. E.
Corresponding author
Laird, John E.
ORCID
Laird, John E.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2205.03854
arXiv
2205.03854
OpenAlex
W4280593207
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/legalcode
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense (FA9550)
  • Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-, FA9550-18-1-0168)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI-based Problem Solving and Planning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cognitive Computing and Networks
Keywords
Soar cognitive architecture, cognitive architecture, human-level AI, decision-making, chunking, reinforcement learning, semantic memory, episodic memory, learning modules, knowledge representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review