PreprintCited by 5Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningCOVID-19 diagnosis using AI

SyntheX: Scaling Up Learning-based X-ray Image Analysis Through In Silico Experiments

Open access
Gao, Cong, Killeen, Benjamin D., Hu, Yicheng, Grupp, Robert B., Taylor, Russell H., Armand, Mehran, Unberath, Mathias·2022·arXiv

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) now enables automated interpretation of medical images for clinical use. However, AI's potential use for interventional images (versus those involved in triage or diagnosis), such as for guidance during surgery, remains largely untapped. This is because surgical AI systems are currently trained using post hoc analysis of data collected during live surgeries, which has fundamental and practical limitations, including ethical considerations, expense, scalability, data integrity, and a lack of ground truth. Here, we demonstrate that creating realistic simulated images from human models is a viable alternative and complement to large-scale in situ data collection. We show that training AI image analysis models on realistically synthesized data, combined with contemporary domain generalization or adaptation techniques, results in models that on real data perform comparably to models trained on a precisely matched real data training set. Because synthetic generation of training data from human-based models scales easily, we find that our model transfer paradigm for X-ray image analysis, which we refer to as SyntheX, can even outperform real data-trained models due to the effectiveness of training on a larger dataset. We demonstrate the potential of SyntheX on three clinical tasks: Hip image analysis, surgical robotic tool detection, and COVID-19 lung lesion segmentation. SyntheX provides an opportunity to drastically accelerate the conception, design, and evaluation of intelligent systems for X-ray-based medicine. In addition, simulated image environments provide the opportunity to test novel instrumentation, design complementary surgical approaches, and envision novel techniques that improve outcomes, save time, or mitigate human error, freed from the ethical and practical considerations of live human data collection.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2206.06127

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DeepDRR is effective on learning-based X-ray imaging tasks compared to naive DRR.

    “Target images during training were generated using a physically-realistic X-ray simulation framework -DeepDRR [36], which is shown to be effective on learning-based X-ray imaging tasks compared to naive DRR [37], [38].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gao, C., Killeen, B. D., Hu, Y., Grupp, R. B., Taylor, R. H., Armand, M., & Unberath, M.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4320234189
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R01EB023939, R01EB016703, R21EB028505)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
Keywords
synthetic image generation, X-ray image analysis, in silico analysis, domain generalization, domain adaptation, model transfer, surgical tool detection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review