PreprintCited by 22Information Retrieval and Search BehaviorTopic ModelingAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Bridging the Gap Between Indexing and Retrieval for Differentiable Search Index with Query Generation

Open access

Abstract

The Differentiable Search Index (DSI) is an emerging paradigm for information retrieval. Unlike traditional retrieval architectures where index and retrieval are two different and separate components, DSI uses a single transformer model to perform both indexing and retrieval. In this paper, we identify and tackle an important issue of current DSI models: the data distribution mismatch that occurs between the DSI indexing and retrieval processes. Specifically, we argue that, at indexing, current DSI methods learn to build connections between the text of long documents and the identifier of the documents, but then retrieval of document identifiers is based on queries that are commonly much shorter than the indexed documents. This problem is further exacerbated when using DSI for cross-lingual retrieval, where document text and query text are in different languages. To address this fundamental problem of current DSI models, we propose a simple yet effective indexing framework for DSI, called DSI-QG. When indexing, DSI-QG represents documents with a number of potentially relevant queries generated by a query generation model and re-ranked and filtered by a cross-encoder ranker. The presence of these queries at indexing allows the DSI models to connect a document identifier to a set of queries, hence mitigating data distribution mismatches present between the indexing and the retrieval phases. Empirical results on popular mono-lingual and cross-lingual passage retrieval datasets show that DSI-QG significantly outperforms the original DSI model.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2206.10128

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • DSI and its variations train pretrained language models on the target corpus and treat the model's parameters as an index of the corpus.

    “For instance, DSI and its variations [134-137] have tried to train pretrained language models on the target corpus directly and then treat the model's parameter as a 'index' of the corpus.”

    From Foundations of GenIR (2025) · cites this paper as [134]

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhuang, S., Ren, H., Shou, L., Pei, J., Gong, M., Zuccon, G., & Jiang, D.
Affiliations
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Beihang University (CN)
  • Microsoft Research Asia (China) (CN)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4283315779
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 13
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Keywords
query generation, cross-lingual information retrieval, passage retrieval, cross-encoder reranking, document representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review