PreprintCited by 3Reinforcement Learning in RoboticsDomain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningArtificial Intelligence in Games

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Light-weight probing of unsupervised representations for Reinforcement Learning

Open access

Abstract

Unsupervised visual representation learning offers the opportunity to leverage large corpora of unlabeled trajectories to form useful visual representations, which can benefit the training of reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms. However, evaluating the fitness of such representations requires training RL algorithms which is computationally intensive and has high variance outcomes. Inspired by the vision community, we study whether linear probing can be a proxy evaluation task for the quality of unsupervised RL representation. Specifically, we probe for the observed reward in a given state and the action of an expert in a given state, both of which are generally applicable to many RL domains. Through rigorous experimentation, we show that the probing tasks are strongly rank correlated with the downstream RL performance on the Atari100k Benchmark, while having lower variance and up to 600x lower computational cost. This provides a more efficient method for exploring the space of pretraining algorithms and identifying promising pretraining recipes without the need to run RL evaluations for every setting. Leveraging this framework, we further improve existing self-supervised learning (SSL) recipes for RL, highlighting the importance of the forward model, the size of the visual backbone, and the precise formulation of the unsupervised objective.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2208.12345

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 71

  1. Agarwal, R., Schuurmans, D., and Norouzi, M. (2020). An optimistic perspective on offline reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2020, 13-18 July 2020, Virtual Event , volume 119 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 104-114. PMLR.
  2. Agarwal, R., Schwarzer, M., Castro, P. S., Courville, A. C., and Bellemare, M. G. (2021). Deep reinforcement learning at the edge of the statistical precipice. In Ranzato, M., Beygelzimer, A., Dauphin, Y. N., Liang, P., and Vaughan, J. W., editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2021, NeurIPS 2021, December 6-14, 2021, virtual , pages 29304-29320.
  3. Anand, A., Racah, E., Ozair, S., Bengio, Y., Côté, M., and Hjelm, R. D. (2019). Unsupervised state representation learning in atari. In Wallach, H. M., Larochelle, H., Beygelzimer, A., d'Alché-Buc, F., Fox, E. B., and Garnett, R., editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2019, NeurIPS 2019, December 8-14, 2019, Vancouver, BC, Canada , pages 8766-8779.
  4. Assran, M., Duval, Q., Misra, I., Bojanowski, P., Vincent, P., Rabbat, M., LeCun, Y., and Ballas, N. (2023). Self-supervised learning from images with a joint-embedding predictive architecture. ArXiv preprint , abs/2301.08243. · arXiv
  5. Aytar, Y., Pfaff, T., Budden, D., Paine, T. L., Wang, Z., and de Freitas, N. (2018). Playing hard exploration games by watching youtube. In Bengio, S., Wallach, H. M., Larochelle, H., Grauman, K., Cesa-Bianchi, N., and Garnett, R., editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2018, NeurIPS 2018, December 3-8, 2018, Montréal, Canada , pages 2935-2945.
  6. Banino, A., Badia, A. P., Walker, J. C., Scholtes, T., Mitrovic, J., and Blundell, C. (2022). Coberl: Contrastive BERT for reinforcement learning. In The Tenth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2022, Virtual Event, April 25-29, 2022 . OpenReview.net.
  7. Bardes, A., Ponce, J., and LeCun, Y. (2022). Vicreg: Variance-invariance-covariance regularization for self-supervised learning. In The Tenth International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2022, Virtual Event, April 25-29, 2022 . OpenReview.net.
  8. Bellemare, M. G., Naddaf, Y., Veness, J., and Bowling, M. (2013). The arcade learning environment: An evaluation platform for general agents. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , 47:253-279.
  9. Bengio, Y., Léonard, N., and Courville, A. (2013). Estimating or propagating gradients through stochastic neurons for conditional computation. ArXiv preprint , abs/1308.3432. · arXiv
  10. Burda, Y., Edwards, H., Pathak, D., Storkey, A. J., Darrell, T., and Efros, A. A. (2019a). Large-scale study of curiosity-driven learning. In 7th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA, May 6-9, 2019 . OpenReview.net.
  11. Burda, Y., Edwards, H., Storkey, A. J., and Klimov, O. (2019b). Exploration by random network distillation. In 7th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2019, New Orleans, LA, USA, May 6-9, 2019 . OpenReview.net.
  12. Caron, M., Misra, I., Mairal, J., Goyal, P., Bojanowski, P., and Joulin, A. (2020). Unsupervised learning of visual features by contrasting cluster assignments. In Larochelle, H., Ranzato, M., Hadsell, R., Balcan, M., and Lin, H., editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2020, NeurIPS 2020, December 6-12, 2020, virtual .
  13. Caron, M., Touvron, H., Misra, I., Jégou, H., Mairal, J., Bojanowski, P., and Joulin, A. (2021). Emerging properties in self-supervised vision transformers. In 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2021, Montreal, QC, Canada, October 10-17, 2021 , pages 9630-9640. IEEE.
  14. Chen, T., Kornblith, S., Norouzi, M., and Hinton, G. E. (2020a). A simple framework for contrastive learning of visual representations. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2020, 13-18 July 2020, Virtual Event , volume 119 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 1597-1607. PMLR.
  15. Chen, X., Fan, H., Girshick, R., and He, K. (2020b). Improved baselines with momentum contrastive learning. ArXiv preprint , abs/2003.04297. · arXiv
  16. Chen, X. and He, K. (2021). Exploring simple siamese representation learning. In IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2021, virtual, June 19-25, 2021 , pages 15750-15758. Computer Vision Foundation / IEEE.
  17. Chiu, C., Qin, J., Zhang, Y., Yu, J., and Wu, Y. (2022). Self-supervised learning with randomprojection quantizer for speech recognition. In Chaudhuri, K., Jegelka, S., Song, L., Szepesvári, C., Niu, G., and Sabato, S., editors, International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2022, 17-23 July 2022, Baltimore, Maryland, USA , volume 162 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 3915-3924. PMLR.
  18. Das, A., Carnevale, F., Merzic, H., Rimell, L., Schneider, R., Abramson, J., Hung, A., Ahuja, A., Clark, S., Wayne, G., and Hill, F. (2020). Probing emergent semantics in predictive agents via question answering. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2020, 13-18 July 2020, Virtual Event , volume 119 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 2376-2391. PMLR.
  19. D'Oro, P., Schwarzer, M., Nikishin, E., Bacon, P.-L., Bellemare, M. G., and Courville, A. (2022). Sample-efficient reinforcement learning by breaking the replay ratio barrier. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations .
  20. Du, Y., Gan, C., and Isola, P. (2021). Curious representation learning for embodied intelligence. In 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2021, Montreal, QC, Canada, October 10-17, 2021 , pages 10388-10397. IEEE.
  21. Garrido, Q., Balestriero, R., Najman, L., and Lecun, Y. (2022). Rankme: Assessing the downstream performance of pretrained self-supervised representations by their rank. ArXiv preprint , abs/2210.02885. · arXiv
  22. Gelada, C., Kumar, S., Buckman, J., Nachum, O., and Bellemare, M. G. (2019). Deepmdp: Learning continuous latent space models for representation learning. In Chaudhuri, K. and Salakhutdinov, R., editors, Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2019, 9-15 June 2019, Long Beach, California, USA , volume 97 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 2170-2179. PMLR.
  23. Ghosh, D., Bhateja, C. A., and Levine, S. (2023). Reinforcement learning from passive data via latent intentions. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 11321-11339. PMLR.
  24. Gidaris, S., Bursuc, A., Puy, G., Komodakis, N., Cord, M., and Pérez, P. (2020). Online bag-ofvisual-words generation for unsupervised representation learning. ArXiv preprint , abs/2012.11552. · arXiv
  25. Grill, J., Strub, F., Altché, F., Tallec, C., Richemond, P. H., Buchatskaya, E., Doersch, C., Pires, B. Á., Guo, Z., Azar, M. G., Piot, B., Kavukcuoglu, K., Munos, R., and Valko, M. (2020). Bootstrap your own latent - A new approach to self-supervised learning. In Larochelle, H., Ranzato, M., Hadsell, R., Balcan, M., and Lin, H., editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2020, NeurIPS 2020, December 6-12, 2020, virtual .
  26. Guo, Z. D., Azar, M. G., Piot, B., Pires, B. A., and Munos, R. (2018). Neural predictive belief representations. ArXiv preprint , abs/1811.06407. · arXiv
  27. Hafner, D., Lillicrap, T. P., Norouzi, M., and Ba, J. (2021). Mastering atari with discrete world models. In 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2021, Virtual Event, Austria, May 3-7, 2021 . OpenReview.net.
  28. Hansen, N., Su, H., and Wang, X. (2022). Temporal difference learning for model predictive control. In Chaudhuri, K., Jegelka, S., Song, L., Szepesvári, C., Niu, G., and Sabato, S., editors, International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2022, 17-23 July 2022, Baltimore, Maryland, USA , volume 162 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 8387-8406. PMLR.
  29. Henderson, P., Islam, R., Bachman, P., Pineau, J., Precup, D., and Meger, D. (2018). Deep reinforcement learning that matters. In McIlraith, S. A. and Weinberger, K. Q., editors, Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (AAAI-18), the 30th innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-18), and the 8th AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (EAAI-18), New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, February 2-7, 2018 , pages 3207-3214. AAAI Press.
  30. Hessel, M., Modayil, J., van Hasselt, H., Schaul, T., Ostrovski, G., Dabney, W., Horgan, D., Piot, B., Azar, M. G., and Silver, D. (2018). Rainbow: Combining improvements in deep reinforcement learning. In McIlraith, S. A. and Weinberger, K. Q., editors, Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (AAAI-18), the 30th innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-18), and the 8th AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (EAAI-18), New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, February 2-7, 2018 , pages 3215-3222. AAAI Press.
  31. Jaderberg, M., Mnih, V., Czarnecki, W. M., Schaul, T., Leibo, J. Z., Silver, D., and Kavukcuoglu, K. (2017). Reinforcement learning with unsupervised auxiliary tasks. In 5th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2017, Toulon, France, April 24-26, 2017, Conference Track Proceedings . OpenReview.net.
  32. Kaiser, L., Babaeizadeh, M., Milos, P., Osinski, B., Campbell, R. H., Czechowski, K., Erhan, D., Finn, C., Kozakowski, P., Levine, S., Mohiuddin, A., Sepassi, R., Tucker, G., and Michalewski, H. (2020). Model based reinforcement learning for atari. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, April 26-30, 2020 . OpenReview.net.
  33. Lange, S., Gabel, T., and Riedmiller, M. (2012). Batch reinforcement learning. In Reinforcement learning , pages 45-73. Springer.
  34. Laskin, M., Srinivas, A., and Abbeel, P. (2020). CURL: contrastive unsupervised representations for reinforcement learning. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2020, 13-18 July 2020, Virtual Event , volume 119 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 5639-5650. PMLR.
  35. Laskin, M., Yarats, D., Liu, H., Lee, K., Zhan, A., Lu, K., Cang, C., Pinto, L., and Abbeel, P. (2021). Urlb: Unsupervised reinforcement learning benchmark. ArXiv preprint , abs/2110.15191. · arXiv
  36. Lee, H., Lee, K., Hwang, D., Lee, H., Lee, B., and Choo, J. (2023). On the importance of feature decorrelation for unsupervised representation learning in reinforcement learning. ArXiv preprint , abs/2306.05637. · arXiv
  37. Lin, H., Mairal, J., and Harchaoui, Z. (2019). An inexact variable metric proximal point algorithm for generic quasi-newton acceleration. SIAM Journal on Optimization , 29(2):1408-1443.
  38. Lin, T., Goyal, P., Girshick, R. B., He, K., and Dollár, P. (2017). Focal loss for dense object detection. In IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, ICCV 2017, Venice, Italy, October 22-29, 2017 , pages 2999-3007. IEEE Computer Society.
  39. Ma, Y. J., Sodhani, S., Jayaraman, D., Bastani, O., Kumar, V., and Zhang, A. (2022). Vip: Towards universal visual reward and representation via value-implicit pre-training. ArXiv preprint , abs/2210.00030. · arXiv
  40. Machado, M. C., Bellemare, M. G., Talvitie, E., Veness, J., Hausknecht, M., and Bowling, M. (2018). Revisiting the arcade learning environment: Evaluation protocols and open problems for general agents. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research , 61:523-562.
  41. Mairal, J. (2015). Incremental majorization-minimization optimization with application to large-scale machine learning. SIAM Journal on Optimization , 25(2):829-855.
  42. Mairal, J. (2019). Cyanure: An Open-Source Toolbox for Empirical Risk Minimization for Python, C++, and soon more. ArXiv preprint , abs/1912.08165. · arXiv
  43. Micheli, V., Alonso, E., and Fleuret, F. (2022). Transformers are sample efficient world models. ArXiv preprint , abs/2209.00588. · arXiv
  44. Mnih, V., Kavukcuoglu, K., Silver, D., Rusu, A. A., Veness, J., Bellemare, M. G., Graves, A., Riedmiller, M., Fidjeland, A. K., Ostrovski, G., et al. (2015). Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning. nature , 518(7540):529-533.
  45. Nair, S., Rajeswaran, A., Kumar, V., Finn, C., and Gupta, A. (2022). R3m: A universal visual representation for robot manipulation. ArXiv preprint , abs/2203.12601. · arXiv
  46. Ni, T., Eysenbach, B., Seyedsalehi, E., Ma, M., Gehring, C., Mahajan, A., and Bacon, P.-L. (2024). Bridging state and history representations: Understanding self-predictive rl. ArXiv preprint , abs/2401.08898. · arXiv
  47. Oh, J., Chockalingam, V., Singh, S. P., and Lee, H. (2016). Control of memory, active perception, and action in minecraft. In Balcan, M. and Weinberger, K. Q., editors, Proceedings of the 33nd International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2016, New York City, NY, USA, June 19-24, 2016 , volume 48 of JMLR Workshop and Conference Proceedings , pages 2790-2799. JMLR.org.
  48. Oquab, M., Darcet, T., Moutakanni, T., Vo, H., Szafraniec, M., Khalidov, V., Fernandez, P., Haziza, D., Massa, F., El-Nouby, A., Assran, M., Ballas, N., Galuba, W., Howes, R., Huang, P.-Y., Li, S.-W., Misra, I., Rabbat, M., Sharma, V., Synnaeve, G., Xu, H., Jegou, H., Mairal, J., Labatut, P., Joulin, A., and Bojanowski, P. (2023). Dinov2: Learning robust visual features without supervision. ArXiv preprint , abs/2304.07193. · arXiv
  49. Pari, J., Muhammad, N., Arunachalam, S. P., Pinto, L., et al. (2021). The surprising effectiveness of representation learning for visual imitation. ArXiv preprint , abs/2112.01511. · arXiv
  50. Perez, E., Strub, F., de Vries, H., Dumoulin, V., and Courville, A. C. (2018). Film: Visual reasoning with a general conditioning layer. In McIlraith, S. A. and Weinberger, K. Q., editors, Proceedings of the Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (AAAI-18), the 30th innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI-18), and the 8th AAAI Symposium on Educational Advances in Artificial Intelligence (EAAI-18), New Orleans, Louisiana, USA, February 2-7, 2018 , pages 3942-3951. AAAI Press.
  51. Racah, E. and Pal, C. (2019). Supervise thyself: Examining self-supervised representations in interactive environments. ArXiv preprint , abs/1906.11951. · arXiv
  52. Robine, J., Höftmann, M., Uelwer, T., and Harmeling, S. (2023). Transformer-based world models are happy with 100k interactions. ArXiv preprint , abs/2303.07109. · arXiv
  53. Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Hubert, T., Simonyan, K., Sifre, L., Schmitt, S., Guez, A., Lockhart, E., Hassabis, D., Graepel, T., et al. (2020). Mastering atari, go, chess and shogi by planning with a learned model. Nature , 588(7839):604-609.
  54. Schwarzer, M., Anand, A., Goel, R., Hjelm, R. D., Courville, A. C., and Bachman, P. (2021a). Data-efficient reinforcement learning with self-predictive representations. In 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2021, Virtual Event, Austria, May 3-7, 2021 . OpenReview.net.
  55. Schwarzer, M., Ceron, J. S. O., Courville, A., Bellemare, M. G., Agarwal, R., and Castro, P. S. (2023). Bigger, better, faster: Human-level atari with human-level efficiency. In International Conference on Machine Learning , pages 30365-30380. PMLR.
  56. Schwarzer, M., Rajkumar, N., Noukhovitch, M., Anand, A., Charlin, L., Hjelm, R. D., Bachman, P., and Courville, A. C. (2021b). Pretraining representations for data-efficient reinforcement learning. In Ranzato, M., Beygelzimer, A., Dauphin, Y. N., Liang, P., and Vaughan, J. W., editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2021, NeurIPS 2021, December 6-14, 2021, virtual , pages 12686-12699.
  57. Sekar, R., Rybkin, O., Daniilidis, K., Abbeel, P., Hafner, D., and Pathak, D. (2020). Planning to explore via self-supervised world models. In Proceedings of the 37th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2020, 13-18 July 2020, Virtual Event , volume 119 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 8583-8592. PMLR.
  58. Seo, Y., Lee, K., James, S. L., and Abbeel, P. (2022). Reinforcement learning with action-free pre-training from videos. In Chaudhuri, K., Jegelka, S., Song, L., Szepesvári, C., Niu, G., and Sabato, S., editors, International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2022, 17-23 July 2022, Baltimore, Maryland, USA , volume 162 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 19561-19579. PMLR.
  59. Stooke, A., Lee, K., Abbeel, P., and Laskin, M. (2021). Decoupling representation learning from reinforcement learning. In Meila, M. and Zhang, T., editors, Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2021, 18-24 July 2021, Virtual Event , volume 139 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 9870-9879. PMLR.
  60. Synnaeve, G., Lin, Z., Gehring, J., Gant, D., Mella, V., Khalidov, V., Carion, N., and Usunier, N. (2018). Forward modeling for partial observation strategy games - A starcraft defogger. In Bengio, S., Wallach, H. M., Larochelle, H., Grauman, K., Cesa-Bianchi, N., and Garnett, R., editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2018, NeurIPS 2018, December 3-8, 2018, Montréal, Canada , pages 10761-10771.
  61. Tassa, Y., Doron, Y., Muldal, A., Erez, T., Li, Y., Casas, D. d. L., Budden, D., Abdolmaleki, A., Merel, J., Lefrancq, A., et al. (2018). Deepmind control suite. ArXiv preprint , abs/1801.00690. · arXiv
  62. Todorov, E., Erez, T., and Tassa, Y. (2012). Mujoco: A physics engine for model-based control. In 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems , pages 5026-5033. IEEE.
  63. Tomar, M., Mishra, U. A., Zhang, A., and Taylor, M. E. (2021). Learning representations for pixel-based control: What matters and why? ArXiv preprint , abs/2111.07775. · arXiv
  64. Touati, A. and Ollivier, Y. (2021). Learning one representation to optimize all rewards. In Ranzato, M., Beygelzimer, A., Dauphin, Y. N., Liang, P., and Vaughan, J. W., editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2021, NeurIPS 2021, December 6-14, 2021, virtual , pages 13-23.
  65. Yarats, D., Fergus, R., Lazaric, A., and Pinto, L. (2021a). Reinforcement learning with prototypical representations. In Meila, M. and Zhang, T., editors, Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2021, 18-24 July 2021, Virtual Event , volume 139 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 11920-11931. PMLR.
  66. Yarats, D., Kostrikov, I., and Fergus, R. (2021b). Image augmentation is all you need: Regularizing deep reinforcement learning from pixels. In 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2021, Virtual Event, Austria, May 3-7, 2021 . OpenReview.net.
  67. Ye, W., Liu, S., Kurutach, T., Abbeel, P., and Gao, Y. (2021). Mastering atari games with limited data. In Ranzato, M., Beygelzimer, A., Dauphin, Y. N., Liang, P., and Vaughan, J. W., editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2021, NeurIPS 2021, December 6-14, 2021, virtual , pages 25476-25488.
  68. Yu, T., Zhang, Z., Lan, C., Chen, Z., and Lu, Y. (2022). Mask-based latent reconstruction for reinforcement learning. ArXiv preprint , abs/2201.12096. · arXiv
  69. Zbontar, J., Jing, L., Misra, I., LeCun, Y., and Deny, S. (2021). Barlow twins: Self-supervised learning via redundancy reduction. In Meila, M. and Zhang, T., editors, Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2021, 18-24 July 2021, Virtual Event , volume 139 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research , pages 12310-12320. PMLR.
  70. Zhang, W., GX-Chen, A., Sobal, V., LeCun, Y., and Carion, N. (2022). Light-weight probing of unsupervised representations for reinforcement learning. ArXiv preprint , abs/2208.12345.
  71. Zhu, J., Xia, Y., Wu, L., Deng, J., gang Zhou, W., Qin, T., and Li, H. (2020). Masked contrastive representation learning for reinforcement learning. ArXiv preprint , abs/2010.07470. · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, W., GX-Chen, A., Sobal, V., LeCun, Y., & Carion, N.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Meta (United States) (US)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4293575545
Cited by
2
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence in Games
Keywords
reinforcement learning, linear probing, forward model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review