CoChat
Sign Up
PreprintCited by 1Speech and dialogue systemsEthics and Social Impacts of AINatural Language Processing Techniques

The DOI matches its DataCite record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Case Report On The "A.I. Locked-In Problem": social concerns with modern NLP

Open access
Walter, Yoshija·2022·arXiv
DOI 10.48550/arxiv.2209.12687arXiv 2209.12687
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Modern NLP models are becoming better conversational agents than their predecessors. Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) and especially Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM) features allow the agent to better store and use information about semantic content, a trend that has become even more pronounced with the Transformer Models. Large Language Models (LLMs) such as GPT-3 by OpenAI have become known to be able to construct and follow a narrative, which enables the system to adopt personas on the go, adapt them and play along in conversational stories. However, practical experimentation with GPT-3 shows that there is a recurring problem with these modern NLP systems, namely that they can "get stuck" in the narrative so that further conversations, prompt executions or commands become futile. This is here referred to as the "Locked-In Problem" and is exemplified with an experimental case report, followed by practical and social concerns that are accompanied with this problem.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2209.12687

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. Alayrac, J.-B., Donahue, J., Luc, P., Miech, A., Barr, I., Hasson, Y., Lenc, K., Mensch, A., Millican, K., Reynolds, M., Ring, R., Rutherford, E., Cabi, S., Han, T., Gong, Z., Samangooei, S., Monteiro, M., Menick, J., Borgeaud, S., … Simonyan, K. (2022). Flamingo: A Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learning (arXiv:2204.14198). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2204.14198 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Boggust, A., Hoover, B., Satyanarayan, A., & Strobelt, H. (2022). Shared Interest: Measuring HumanAI Alignment to Identify Recurring Patterns in Model Behavior. CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3501965 · DOI
  3. Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D., Wu, J., Winter, C., … Amodei, D. (2020). Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. In H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M. F. Balcan, & H. Lin (Eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 33, pp. 1877-1901). Curran Associates, Inc. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2020/file/1457c0d6bfcb4967418bfb8ac142f64aPaper.pdf
  4. Butlin, P. (2021). AI Alignment and Human Reward. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (pp. 437-445). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461702.3462570 · DOI
  5. Dosovitskiy, A., Beyer, L., Kolesnikov, A., Weissenborn, D., Zhai, X., Unterthiner, T., Dehghani, M., Minderer, M., Heigold, G., Gelly, S., Uszkoreit, J., & Houlsby, N. (2021). An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale (arXiv:2010.11929). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2010.11929 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Gabriel, I. (2020). Artificial Intelligence, Values, and Alignment. Minds and Machines , 30 (3), 411437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-020-09539-2 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Georgi, D., & Hadwich, K. (2010). Management von Kundenbeziehungen: Perspektiven - Analysen Strategien - Instrumente . Springer-Verlag.
  8. Graves, A. (2014). Generating Sequences With Recurrent Neural Networks (arXiv:1308.0850). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1308.0850 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Haigh, T., & Ceruzzi, P. E. (2021). A New History of Modern Computing . MIT Press.
  10. Hinton, G., & Sejnowski, T. J. (Eds.). (1999). Unsupervised Learning: Foundations of Neural Computation (1st Edition). MIT Press.
  11. Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long Short-Term Memory. Neural Computation , 9 (8), 1735-1780.
  12. Karpathy, A., Johnson, J., & Fei-Fei, L. (2015). Visualizing and Understanding Recurrent Networks (arXiv:1506.02078). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1506.02078 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2012). ImageNet Classification with Deep Convolutional Neural Networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems , 25 . https://papers.nips.cc/paper/2012/hash/c399862d3b9d6b76c8436e924a68c45b-Abstract.html
  14. Lakew, S. M., Cettolo, M., & Federico, M. (2018). A Comparison of Transformer and Recurrent Neural Networks on Multilingual Neural Machine Translation (arXiv:1806.06957). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1806.06957 · DOI
  15. Li, N., Liu, S., Liu, Y., Zhao, S., & Liu, M. (2019). Neural Speech Synthesis with Transformer Network. Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , 33 (01), 6706-6713. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaai.v33i01.33016706 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Liu, Y., Wu, Y.-H., Sun, G., Zhang, L., Chhatkuli, A., & Van Gool, L. (2022). Vision Transformers with Hierarchical Attention (arXiv:2106.03180). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.03180 · DOI
  17. Massimov, K. (2020). Künstliche Intelligenz: Masterplan für die Zukunft . Langen Mueller Herbig. Medsker, L., & Jain, L. C. (1999). Recurrent Neural Networks: Design and Applications . CRC Press. O'Regan, G. (2021). A Brief History of Computing . Springer Nature.
  18. Radfar, M., Mouchtaris, A., & Kunzmann, S. (2020). End-to-End Neural Transformer Based Spoken Language Understanding (arXiv:2008.10984). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2008.10984 · DOI
  19. Saharia, C., Chan, W., Saxena, S., Li, L., Whang, J., Denton, E., Ghasemipour, S. K. S., Ayan, B. K., Mahdavi, S. S., Lopes, R. G., Salimans, T., Ho, J., Fleet, D. J., & Norouzi, M. (2022). Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language Understanding (arXiv:2205.11487). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.11487 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Salehinejad, H., Sankar, S., Barfett, J., Colak, E., & Valaee, S. (2018). Recent Advances in Recurrent Neural Networks (arXiv:1801.01078). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1801.01078 · DOI
  21. Smith, E., & Delargy, M. (2005). Locked-in syndrome. BMJ , 330 (7488), 406-409. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.330.7488.406 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Staudemeyer, R. C., & Morris, E. R. (2019). Understanding LSTM -- a tutorial into Long Short-Term Memory Recurrent Neural Networks (arXiv:1909.09586). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1909.09586 · DOI
  23. Thoppilan, R., De Freitas, D., Hall, J., Shazeer, N., Kulshreshtha, A., Cheng, H.-T., Jin, A., Bos, T., Baker, L., Du, Y., Li, Y., Lee, H., Zheng, H. S., Ghafouri, A., Menegali, M., Huang, Y., Krikun, M., Lepikhin, D., Qin, J., … Le, Q. (2022). LaMDA: Language Models for Dialog Applications (arXiv:2201.08239). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2201.08239 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Turing, A. M. (1950). 1. Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind , LIX (236), 433-460. https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/LIX.236.433 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention Is All You Need (arXiv:1706.03762). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1706.03762 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Walter, Y. (2022). Building Human Systems of Trust in an Accelerating Digital and AI-Driven World. Frontiers in Human Dynamics (Section Digital Impacts) , 4 (926281), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fhumd.2022.926281 · DOI
  27. Weizenbaum, J. (1966). ELIZA - A Computer Program For the Study of Natural Language Communication Between Man And Machine. Communications of the ACM , 9 (1), 36-46.
  28. Yu, Y., Si, X., Hu, C., & Zhang, J. (2019). A Review of Recurrent Neural Networks: LSTM Cells and Network Architectures. Neural Computation , 31 (7), 1235-1270. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco\_a\_01199 · DOI
  29. Zhang, S., Roller, S., Goyal, N., Artetxe, M., Chen, M., Chen, S., Dewan, C., Diab, M., Li, X., Lin, X. V., Mihaylov, T., Ott, M., Shleifer, S., Shuster, K., Simig, D., Koura, P. S., Sridhar, A., Wang, T., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2022). OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Models (arXiv:2205.01068). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2205.01068 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1

Metadata

Authors
Walter, Y.
Corresponding author
Walter, Yoshija
ORCID
Walter, Yoshija
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.2209.12687
arXiv
2209.12687
OpenAlex
W4297433305
Cited by
1
References
1
Citations by year
2024: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
large language models, GPT-3, chatbots, social problems, AI ethics, transformer models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review