The DOI matches its DataCite record.
DecAF: Joint Decoding of Answers and Logical Forms for Question Answering over Knowledge Bases
Abstract
Question answering over knowledge bases (KBs) aims to answer natural language questions with factual information such as entities and relations in KBs. Previous methods either generate logical forms that can be executed over KBs to obtain final answers or predict answers directly. Empirical results show that the former often produces more accurate answers, but it suffers from non-execution issues due to potential syntactic and semantic errors in the generated logical forms. In this work, we propose a novel framework DecAF that jointly generates both logical forms and direct answers, and then combines the merits of them to get the final answers. Moreover, different from most of the previous methods, DecAF is based on simple free-text retrieval without relying on any entity linking tools -- this simplification eases its adaptation to different datasets. DecAF achieves new state-of-the-art accuracy on WebQSP, FreebaseQA, and GrailQA benchmarks, while getting competitive results on the ComplexWebQuestions benchmark.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“SKP [110], DECAF [109], and KD-CoT [111] all retrieve triplets and conduct fusion-in-decoder [35] RAG.”
From Retrieval-Augmented Generation for AI-Generated Content: A Survey (2024) · cites this paper as [109]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Wang, K., Duan, F., Wang, S., Li, P., Xian, Y., Yin, C., Rong, W., & Xiong, Z. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.13259 · Cited by 16
LEGO-GraphRAG: Modularizing Graph-Based Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Design Space Exploration
Cao, Y., Gao, Z., Li, Z., Xie, X., Zhou, S. K., & Xu, J. (2025) · Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment · doi:10.14778/3748191.3748194 · Cited by 11
Relation-Aware Question Answering for Heterogeneous Knowledge Graphs
Du, H., Huang, Q., Li, C., Zhang, C., Li, Y., & Zhao, D. (2023) · Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: EMNLP 2023 · doi:10.18653/v1/2023.findings-emnlp.906 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Yu, D., Zhang, S., Ng, P., Zhu, H., Li, A. H., Wang, J., Hu, Y., Wang, W., Wang, Z., & Xiang, B.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- arXiv
- 2210.00063
- References
- 0
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: DecAF: Joint Decoding of Answers and Logical Forms for Question Answering over Knowledge Bases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2210.00063
- The paper
- Yu, D., Zhang, S., Ng, P., Zhu, H., Li, A. H., Wang, J., Hu, Y., Wang, W., Wang, Z., & Xiang, B. (2022). DecAF: Joint Decoding of Answers and Logical Forms for Question Answering over Knowledge Bases. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2210.00063
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.