Transfer deep reinforcement learning-based large-scale V2G continuous charging coordination with renewable energy sources
Open accessAbstract
Due to the increasing popularity of electric vehicles (EVs) and the technological advancement of EV electronics, the vehicle-to-grid (V2G) technique and large-scale scheduling algorithms have been developed to achieve a high level of renewable energy and power grid stability. This paper proposes a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) method for the continuous charging/discharging coordination strategy in aggregating large-scale EVs in V2G mode with renewable energy sources (RES). The DRL coordination strategy can efficiently optimize the electric vehicle aggregator's (EVA's) real-time charging/discharging power with the state of charge (SOC) constraints of the EVA and the individual EV. Compared with uncontrolled charging, the load variance is reduced by 97.37$\%$ and the charging cost by 76.56$\%$. The DRL coordination strategy further demonstrates outstanding transfer learning ability to microgrids with RES and large-scale EVA, as well as the complicated weekly scheduling. The DRL coordination strategy demonstrates flexible, adaptable, and scalable performance for the large-scale V2G under realistic operating conditions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Automated grids can respond to localized congestion by reconfiguring themselves dynamically based on load profiles due to EV charging, resulting in optimal power flows while minimizing voltage deviations.
“Automated grids can respond to localized congestion by reconfiguring themselves dynamically based on load profiles due to EV charging; this results in optimal power flows while minimizing voltage deviations [72], [78], [110], [111].”
From Economic Impacts and Mitigation for the Grid Connected Electric Vehicle Charging: A Technical and Operational Overview (2026) · cites this paper as [72]
Using machine learning models based on historical data on charging and weather patterns, utilities can predict load peaks and proactively trigger demand response protocols or load shifting before congestion arises.
“Using machine learning models based on historical data on charging and weather patterns, utilities can predict load peaks and proactively trigger demand response protocols or load shifting, before congestion arises [72].”
From Economic Impacts and Mitigation for the Grid Connected Electric Vehicle Charging: A Technical and Operational Overview (2026) · cites this paper as [72]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 6
- Authors
- Zhang, Y., Chen, X., & Zhang, Y.
- Affiliations
- State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation and Power Equipment (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2210.07013
- OpenAlex
- W4306311714
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (21773182, B030103)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
- Keywords
- vehicle-to-grid, electric vehicle charging scheduling, deep reinforcement learning, transfer learning, electric vehicle aggregators, renewable energy integration, state of charge constraints, charging cost minimization, microgrids, weekly scheduling, power system stability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review