PreprintCited by 6Context-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsHuman Pose and Action RecognitionGait Recognition and Analysis

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

MMTSA: Multimodal Temporal Segment Attention Network for Efficient Human Activity Recognition

Open access

Abstract

Multimodal sensors provide complementary information to develop accurate machine-learning methods for human activity recognition (HAR), but introduce significantly higher computational load, which reduces efficiency. This paper proposes an efficient multimodal neural architecture for HAR using an RGB camera and inertial measurement units (IMUs) called Multimodal Temporal Segment Attention Network (MMTSA). MMTSA first transforms IMU sensor data into a temporal and structure-preserving gray-scale image using the Gramian Angular Field (GAF), representing the inherent properties of human activities. MMTSA then applies a multimodal sparse sampling method to reduce data redundancy. Lastly, MMTSA adopts an inter-segment attention module for efficient multimodal fusion. Using three well-established public datasets, we evaluated MMTSA's effectiveness and efficiency in HAR. Results show that our method achieves superior performance improvements 11.13% of cross-subject F1-score on the MMAct dataset than the previous state-of-the-art (SOTA) methods. The ablation study and analysis suggest that MMTSA's effectiveness in fusing multimodal data for accurate HAR. The efficiency evaluation on an edge device showed that MMTSA achieved significantly better accuracy, lower computational load, and lower inference latency than SOTA methods.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2210.09222

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. [1][1] Aparna Akula, Anuj K Shah, and Ripul Ghosh. 2018. Deep learning approach for human action recognition in infrared images. Cognitive Systems Research 50 (2018), 146-154. -
  2. [3][3] Valentina Bianchi, Marco Bassoli, Gianfranco Lombardo, Paolo Fornacciari, Monica Mordonini, and Ilaria De Munari. 2019. IoT wearable sensor and deep learning: An integrated approach for personalized human activity recognition in a smart home environment. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 6, 5 (2019), 8553-8562. -
  3. [2][2] Gedas Bertasius, Heng Wang, and Lorenzo Torresani. 2021. Is space-time attention all you need for video understanding?. In ICML , Vol. 2. 4. -
  4. [4][4] João Carreira and Andrew Zisserman. 2017. Quo Vadis, Action Recognition? A New Model and the Kinetics Dataset. In 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, CVPR 2017, Honolulu, HI, USA, July 21-26, 2017 . IEEE Computer Society, 4724-4733. https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2017.502 - · DOI · Paper page
  5. [6][6] Vahid Ashkani Chenarlogh and Farbod Razzazi. 2019. Multi-stream 3D CNN structure for human action recognition trained by limited data. IET Computer Vision 13, 3 (2019), 338-344. -
  6. [5][5] Kaixuan Chen, Dalin Zhang, Lina Yao, Bin Guo, Zhiwen Yu, and Yunhao Liu. 2021. Deep learning for sensor-based human activity recognition: Overview, challenges, and opportunities. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 54, 4 (2021), 1-40. -
  7. [7][7] Lu Chi, Guiyu Tian, Yadong Mu, and Qi Tian. 2019. Two-stream video classification with cross-modality attention. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision Workshops . 0-0. -
  8. [9][9] Alexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn, Xiaohua Zhai, Thomas Unterthiner, Mostafa Dehghani, Matthias Minderer, Georg Heigold, Sylvain Gelly, et al. 2020. An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.11929 (2020). - · arXiv
  9. [8][8] Hyeongju Choi, Apoorva Beedu, Harish Haresamudram, and Irfan Essa. 2022. Multi-Stage Based Feature Fusion of Multi-Modal Data for Human Activity Recognition. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.04331 (2022). - · arXiv
  10. [10][10] Christoph Feichtenhofer, Haoqi Fan, Jitendra Malik, and Kaiming He. 2019. Slowfast networks for video recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision . 6202-6211. -
  11. [12][12] Alejandra García-Hernández, Carlos E Galván-Tejada, Jorge I Galván-Tejada, José M Celaya-Padilla, Hamurabi Gamboa-Rosales, Perla Velasco-Elizondo, and Rogelio Cárdenas-Vargas. 2017. A similarity analysis of audio signal to develop a human activity recognition using similarity networks. Sensors 17, 11 (2017), 2688. -
  12. [11][11] Christoph Feichtenhofer, Axel Pinz, and Andrew Zisserman. 2016. Convolutional two-stream network fusion for video action recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition . 1933-1941. -
  13. [13][13] Andrey Ignatov. 2018. Real-time human activity recognition from accelerometer data using Convolutional Neural Networks. Applied Soft Computing 62 (2018), 915-922. -
  14. [15][15] Md Mofijul Islam and Tariq Iqbal. 2021. Multi-gat: A graphical attention-based hierarchical multimodal representation learning approach for human activity recognition. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters 6, 2 (2021), 1729-1736. -
  15. [14][14] Md Mofijul Islam and Tariq Iqbal. 2020. Hamlet: A hierarchical multimodal attention-based human activity recognition algorithm. In 2020 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) . IEEE, 10285-10292. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol., Vol. 7, No. 3, Article 96. Publication date: September 2023. -
  16. [16][16] Md Mofijul Islam and Tariq Iqbal. 2022. MuMu: Cooperative multitask learning-based guided multimodal fusion,'. AAAI. -
  17. [18][18] Andrej Karpathy, George Toderici, Sanketh Shetty, Thomas Leung, Rahul Sukthankar, and Li Fei-Fei. 2014. Large-scale video classification with convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . 1725-1732. -
  18. [17][17] Hamid Reza Vaezi Joze, Amirreza Shaban, Michael L Iuzzolino, and Kazuhito Koishida. 2020. MMTM: Multimodal transfer module for CNN fusion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . 13289-13299. -
  19. [19][19] Evangelos Kazakos, Arsha Nagrani, Andrew Zisserman, and Dima Damen. 2019. Epic-fusion: Audio-visual temporal binding for egocentric action recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision . 5492-5501. -
  20. [21][21] Quan Kong, Ziming Wu, Ziwei Deng, Martin Klinkigt, Bin Tong, and Tomokazu Murakami. 2019. MMAct: A Large-Scale Dataset for Cross Modal Human Action Understanding. In The IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) . -
  21. [20][20] Nikita Kitaev, Łukasz Kaiser, and Anselm Levskaya. 2020. Reformer: The efficient transformer. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.04451 (2020). - · arXiv
  22. [22][22] Jennifer R Kwapisz, Gary M Weiss, and Samuel A Moore. 2011. Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers. ACM SigKDD Explorations Newsletter 12, 2 (2011), 74-82. -
  23. [24][24] Chen Liang, Chun Yu, Yue Qin, Yuntao Wang, and Yuanchun Shi. 2021. DualRing: Enabling Subtle and Expressive Hand Interaction with Dual IMU Rings. Proc. ACM Interact. Mob. Wearable Ubiquitous Technol. 5, 3, Article 115 (sep 2021), 27 pages. https://doi.org/10. 1145/3478114 -
  24. [23][23] Colin Lea, Rene Vidal, Austin Reiter, and Gregory D Hager. 2016. Temporal convolutional networks: A unified approach to action segmentation. In Computer Vision-ECCV 2016 Workshops: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, October 8-10 and 15-16, 2016, Proceedings, Part III 14 . Springer, 47-54. -
  25. [25][25] Ji Lin, Chuang Gan, and Song Han. 2019. Tsm: Temporal shift module for efficient video understanding. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision . 7083-7093. -
  26. [27][27] Xiang Long, Chuang Gan, Gerard Melo, Xiao Liu, Yandong Li, Fu Li, and Shilei Wen. 2018. Multimodal keyless attention fusion for video classification. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence , Vol. 32. -
  27. [26][26] Yang Liu, Keze Wang, Guanbin Li, and Liang Lin. 2021. Semantics-aware adaptive knowledge distillation for sensor-to-vision action recognition. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 30 (2021), 5573-5588. -
  28. [28][28] Jiasen Lu, Dhruv Batra, Devi Parikh, and Stefan Lee. 2019. Vilbert: Pretraining task-agnostic visiolinguistic representations for vision-and-language tasks. Advances in neural information processing systems 32 (2019). -
  29. [30][30] Subhas Chandra Mukhopadhyay. 2014. Wearable sensors for human activity monitoring: A review. IEEE sensors journal 15, 3 (2014), 1321-1330. -
  30. [29][29] Jianjie Lu and Kai-Yu Tong. 2019. Robust single accelerometer-based activity recognition using modified recurrence plot. IEEE Sensors Journal 19, 15 (2019), 6317-6324. -
  31. [31][31] Abdulmajid Murad and Jae-Young Pyun. 2017. Deep recurrent neural networks for human activity recognition. Sensors 17, 11 (2017), 2556. -
  32. [33][33] Madhuri Panwar, S Ram Dyuthi, K Chandra Prakash, Dwaipayan Biswas, Amit Acharyya, Koushik Maharatna, Arvind Gautam, and Ganesh R Naik. 2017. CNN based approach for activity recognition using a wrist-worn accelerometer. In 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) . IEEE, 2438-2441. -
  33. [32][32] Ferda Ofli, Rizwan Chaudhry, Gregorij Kurillo, René Vidal, and Ruzena Bajcsy. 2013. Berkeley mhad: A comprehensive multimodal human action database. In 2013 IEEE workshop on applications of computer vision (WACV) . IEEE, 53-60. -
  34. [34][34] Madhuri Panwar, S Ram Dyuthi, K Chandra Prakash, Dwaipayan Biswas, Amit Acharyya, Koushik Maharatna, Arvind Gautam, and Ganesh R Naik. 2017. CNN based approach for activity recognition using a wrist-worn accelerometer. In 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) . IEEE, 2438-2441. -
  35. [36][36] Rafael Possas, Sheila Pinto Caceres, and Fabio Ramos. 2018. Egocentric activity recognition on a budget. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . 5967-5976. -
  36. [35][35] Razvan Pascanu, Tomas Mikolov, and Yoshua Bengio. 2013. On the difficulty of training recurrent neural networks. In International conference on machine learning . PMLR, 1310-1318. -
  37. [37][37] Yoli Shavit and Itzik Klein. 2021. Boosting inertial-based human activity recognition with transformers. IEEE Access 9 (2021), 53540-53547. -
  38. [39][39] Salwa O Slim, Ayman Atia, Marwa MA Elfattah, and Mostafa-Sami M Mostafa. 2019. Survey on human activity recognition based on acceleration data. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications 10, 3 (2019). -
  39. [38][38] Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman. 2014. Two-stream convolutional networks for action recognition in videos. Advances in neural information processing systems 27 (2014). -
  40. [40][40] Sibo Song, Vijay Chandrasekhar, Ngai-Man Cheung, Sanath Narayan, Liyuan Li, and Joo-Hwee Lim. 2014. Activity recognition in egocentric life-logging videos. In Asian conference on computer vision . Springer, 445-458. -
  41. [41][41] Sibo Song, Vijay Chandrasekhar, Bappaditya Mandal, Liyuan Li, Joo-Hwee Lim, Giduthuri Sateesh Babu, Phyo Phyo San, and Ngai-Man Cheung. 2016. Multimodal multi-stream deep learning for egocentric activity recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition workshops . 24-31. -
  42. [42][42] Sibo Song, Ngai-Man Cheung, Vijay Chandrasekhar, Bappaditya Mandal, and Jie Liri. 2016. Egocentric activity recognition with multimodal fisher vector. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) . IEEE, 2717-2721. -
  43. [44][44] Ke Sun, Yuntao Wang, Chun Yu, Yukang Yan, Hongyi Wen, and Yuanchun Shi. 2017. Float: One-Handed and Touch-Free Target Selection on Smartwatches. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Denver, Colorado, USA) (CHI '17) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 692-704. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3026027 - · DOI
  44. [43][43] Odongo Steven Eyobu and Dong Seog Han. 2018. Feature representation and data augmentation for human activity classification based on wearable IMU sensor data using a deep LSTM neural network. Sensors 18, 9 (2018), 2892. -
  45. [45][45] Lin Sun, Kui Jia, Kevin Chen, Dit-Yan Yeung, Bertram E Shi, and Silvio Savarese. 2017. Lattice long short-term memory for human action recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision . 2147-2156. -
  46. [47][47] Catherine Tong, Jinchen Ge, and Nicholas D Lane. 2021. Zero-shot learning for imu-based activity recognition using video embeddings. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 5, 4 (2021), 1-23. -
  47. [46][46] Senem Tanberk, Zeynep Hilal Kilimci, Dilek Bilgin Tükel, Mitat Uysal, and Selim Akyokuş. 2020. A Hybrid Deep Model Using Deep Learning and Dense Optical Flow Approaches for Human Activity Recognition. IEEE Access 8 (2020), 19799-19809. https: //doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2968529 - · DOI
  48. [48][48] Du Tran, Lubomir Bourdev, Rob Fergus, Lorenzo Torresani, and Manohar Paluri. 2015. Learning Spatiotemporal Features With 3D Convolutional Networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) . -
  49. [50][50] Jindong Wang, Yiqiang Chen, Shuji Hao, Xiaohui Peng, and Lisha Hu. 2019. Deep learning for sensor-based activity recognition: A survey. Pattern recognition letters 119 (2019), 3-11. -
  50. [49][49] Ashish Vaswani, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, Jakob Uszkoreit, Llion Jones, Aidan N Gomez, Łukasz Kaiser, and Illia Polosukhin. 2017. Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017). -
  51. [51][51] Jiahao Wang, Qiuling Long, Kexuan Liu, Yingzi Xie, et al. 2019. Human action recognition on cellphone using compositional bidir-lstmcnn networks. In 2019 International Conference on Computer, Network, Communication and Information Systems (CNCI 2019) . Atlantis Press, 687-692. -
  52. [53][53] Yuntao Wang, Jiexin Ding, Ishan Chatterjee, Farshid Salemi Parizi, Yuzhou Zhuang, Yukang Yan, Shwetak Patel, and Yuanchun Shi. 2022. FaceOri: Tracking Head Position and Orientation Using Ultrasonic Ranging on Earphones. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI '22) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 290, 12 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3517698 - · DOI
  53. [52][52] Limin Wang, Yuanjun Xiong, Zhe Wang, Yu Qiao, Dahua Lin, Xiaoou Tang, and Luc Van Gool. 2016. Temporal segment networks: Towards good practices for deep action recognition. In European conference on computer vision . Springer, 20-36. -
  54. [54][54] Zhiguang Wang and Tim Oates. 2015. Encoding time series as images for visual inspection and classification using tiled convolutional neural networks. In Workshops at the twenty-ninth AAAI conference on artificial intelligence . -
  55. [56][56] Chuhan Wu, Fangzhao Wu, Tao Qi, Yongfeng Huang, and Xing Xie. 2021. Fastformer: Additive attention can be all you need. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.09084 (2021). - · arXiv
  56. [55][55] Haoran Wei, Roozbeh Jafari, and Nasser Kehtarnavaz. 2019. Fusion of video and inertial sensing for deep learning-based human action recognition. Sensors 19, 17 (2019), 3680. -
  57. [57][57] Yunan Wu, Feng Yang, Ying Liu, Xuefan Zha, and Shaofeng Yuan. 2018. A comparison of 1-D and 2-D deep convolutional neural networks in ECG classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.07088 (2018). - · arXiv
  58. [59][59] Jiewen Yang, Xingbo Dong, Liujun Liu, Chao Zhang, Jiajun Shen, and Dahai Yu. 2022. Recurring the transformer for video action recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition . 14063-14073. -
  59. [58][58] Huatao Xu, Pengfei Zhou, Rui Tan, Mo Li, and Guobin Shen. 2021. LIMU-BERT: Unleashing the Potential of Unlabeled Data for IMU Sensing Applications. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems . 220-233. -
  60. [60][60] Ming Zeng, Le T Nguyen, Bo Yu, Ole J Mengshoel, Jiang Zhu, Pang Wu, and Joy Zhang. 2014. Convolutional neural networks for human activity recognition using mobile sensors. In 6th international conference on mobile computing, applications and services . IEEE, 197-205. -
  61. [61][61] Xiyuxing Zhang, Yuntao Wang, Jingru Zhang, Yaqing Yang, Shwetak Patel, and Yuanchun Shi. 2023. EarCough: Enabling Continuous Subject Cough Event Detection on Hearables. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Hamburg, Germany) (CHI EA '23) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 94, 6 pages. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3585903 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gao, Z., Wang, Y., Chen, J., Xing, J., Patel, S., Liu, X., & Shi, Y.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2022
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4306808687
Cited by
6
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62132010, 62002198, 2021QNRC001)
  • Tsinghua University
  • Beijing National Research Center For Information Science And Technology
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
Keywords
human activity recognition, multimodal fusion, inertial measurement unit, Gramian Angular Field, sparse sampling, edge deployment, computational efficiency, inference latency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review