Low-Resource Multilingual and Zero-Shot Multispeaker TTS
Open accessAbstract
While neural methods for text-to-speech (TTS) have shown great advances in modeling multiple speakers, even in zero-shot settings, the amount of data needed for those approaches is generally not feasible for the vast majority of the world's over 6,000 spoken languages. In this work, we bring together the tasks of zero-shot voice cloning and multilingual low-resource TTS. Using the language agnostic meta learning (LAML) procedure and modifications to a TTS encoder, we show that it is possible for a system to learn speaking a new language using just 5 minutes of training data while retaining the ability to infer the voice of even unseen speakers in the newly learned language. We show the success of our proposed approach in terms of intelligibility, naturalness and similarity to target speaker using objective metrics as well as human studies and provide our code and trained models open source.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The second best recognized attack by the non-SSL based detector was A21 (ToucanTTS + BigVGAN) with a pooled min DCF of 0.148.
“The second best recognized attack was A21 (ToucanTTS [28] +BigVGAN [29]) with a pooled min DCF of 0.148.”
From Robust audio deepfake detection: exploring front-/back-end combinations and data augmentation strategies for the ASVspoof5 Challenge (2024) · cites this paper as [28]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schäfer, K., Choi, J.-E., & Neu, M. (2024) · The Automatic Speaker Verification Spoofing Countermeasures Workshop (ASVspoof 2024) · doi:10.21437/asvspoof.2024-9 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“The second best recognized attack was A21 (ToucanTTS [28] +BigVGAN [29]) with a pooled min DCF of 0.148.”
Influential
- Authors
- Lux, F., Koch, J., & Vu, N. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Stuttgart (DE)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2210.12223
- OpenAlex
- W4307307993
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Voice and Speech Disorders
- Keywords
- text-to-speech, multilingual speech synthesis, low-resource languages, limited training data
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review