The DOI matches its DataCite record.
High Fidelity Neural Audio Compression
Open accessAbstract
We introduce a state-of-the-art real-time, high-fidelity, audio codec leveraging neural networks. It consists in a streaming encoder-decoder architecture with quantized latent space trained in an end-to-end fashion. We simplify and speed-up the training by using a single multiscale spectrogram adversary that efficiently reduces artifacts and produce high-quality samples. We introduce a novel loss balancer mechanism to stabilize training: the weight of a loss now defines the fraction of the overall gradient it should represent, thus decoupling the choice of this hyper-parameter from the typical scale of the loss. Finally, we study how lightweight Transformer models can be used to further compress the obtained representation by up to 40%, while staying faster than real time. We provide a detailed description of the key design choices of the proposed model including: training objective, architectural changes and a study of various perceptual loss functions. We present an extensive subjective evaluation (MUSHRA tests) together with an ablation study for a range of bandwidths and audio domains, including speech, noisy-reverberant speech, and music. Our approach is superior to the baselines methods across all evaluated settings, considering both 24 kHz monophonic and 48 kHz stereophonic audio. Code and models are available at github.com/facebookresearch/encodec.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The most challenging codecs for our non-SSL based detectors were codec-4 (Encodec [26]), 7 (mp3+Encodec) and 10 (speex) with pooled min DCF of 0.675, 0.683 and 0.701.”
From Robust audio deepfake detection: exploring front-/back-end combinations and data augmentation strategies for the ASVspoof5 Challenge (2024) · cites this paper as [26]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Edge Computing on IoT for Machine Signal Processing and Fault Diagnosis: A Review
Lu, S., Lu, J., An, K., Wang, X., & He, Q. (2023) · IEEE Internet of Things Journal · doi:10.1109/jiot.2023.3239944 · Cited by 306
Neural Codec Language Models are Zero-Shot Text to Speech Synthesizers
Wang, C., Chen, S., Wu, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhou, L., Liu, S., Chen, Z., Liu, Y., Wang, H., Li, J., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2301.02111 · Cited by 250
Neural Codec Language Models are Zero-Shot Text to Speech Synthesizers
Chen, S., Wang, C., Wu, Y., Zhang, Z., Zhou, L., Liu, S., Chen, Z., Liu, T., Wang, H., Li, J., et al. (2025) · IEEE Transactions on Audio Speech and Language Processing · doi:10.1109/taslpro.2025.3530270 · Cited by 162
ASVspoof 5: crowdsourced speech data, deepfakes, and adversarial attacks at scale
Wang, X., Delgado, H., Tak, H., Jung, J.-W., Shim, H.-J., Todisco, M., Kukanov, I., Liu, X., Sahidullah, M., Kinnunen, T. H., et al. (2024) · The Automatic Speaker Verification Spoofing Countermeasures Workshop (ASVspoof 2024) · doi:10.21437/asvspoof.2024-1 · Cited by 101
Evans, Z., Parker, J. D., Carr, C., Zukowski, Z., Taylor, J., & Pons, J. (2025) · IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing · doi:10.1109/icassp49660.2025.10888461 · Cited by 236
Metadata
- Authors
- Défossez, A., Copet, J., Synnaeve, G., & Adi, Y.
- Affiliations
- Meta (Israel) (IL)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2210.13438
- OpenAlex
- W4307323391
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 112 · 2024: 145 · 2023: 21
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Music and Audio Processing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Data Compression Techniques
- Keywords
- audio codec, encoder-decoder architecture, loss balancing, lightweight transformer, perceptual loss, MUSHRA, stereo audio
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
