The DOI matches its DataCite record; 60 of the 81 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
SciRepEval: A Multi-Format Benchmark for Scientific Document Representations
Open accessAbstract
Learned representations of scientific documents can serve as valuable input features for downstream tasks without further fine-tuning. However, existing benchmarks for evaluating these representations fail to capture the diversity of relevant tasks. In response, we introduce SciRepEval, the first comprehensive benchmark for training and evaluating scientific document representations. It includes 24 challenging and realistic tasks, 8 of which are new, across four formats: classification, regression, ranking and search. We then use this benchmark to study and improve the generalization ability of scientific document representation models. We show how state-of-the-art models like SPECTER and SciNCL struggle to generalize across the task formats, and that simple multi-task training fails to improve them. However, a new approach that learns multiple embeddings per document, each tailored to a different format, can improve performance. We experiment with task-format-specific control codes and adapters and find they outperform the existing single-embedding state-of-the-art by over 2 points absolute. We release the resulting family of multi-format models, called SPECTER2, for the community to use and build on.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, we employed SPECTER2 (Singh et al., 2022) and SciB-ERT (Beltagy et al., 2019) embeddings, designed for scientific texts and have shown superior performance in domain-specific applications.”
From YESciEval: Robust LLM-as-a-Judge for Scientific Question Answering (2025) · cites this paper as Singh et al., 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1706.03762 · Cited by 120,404 · cited 1×
“Adapters for Multiple Tasks Adapters were introduced by Houlsby et al. (2019) for parameter efficient training of transformers (Vaswani et al., 2017).”
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325 · cited 1×
“Recent work has shown how pre-trained language models (e.g. (Devlin et al., 2019; Raffel et al., 2020; Brown et al., 2020)) can be tailored to produce high-quality document representations with contrastive learning (Xu et al., 2021; Gao et al., 2021; Neelakantan et al., 2022).”
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372 · cited 1×
“Recent work has shown how pre-trained language models (e.g. (Devlin et al., 2019; Raffel et al., 2020; Brown et al., 2020)) can be tailored to produce high-quality document representations with contrastive learning (Xu et al., 2021; Gao et al., 2021; Neelakantan et al., 2022).”
Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networks
Reimers, N., & Gurevych, I. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1410 · Cited by 12,778 · cited 1×
“These tend to perform better than general purpose models on scientific domain tasks, and serve as a foundation for learning dense embeddings of scientific documents.”
Deep Contextualized Word Representations
Peters, M., Neumann, M., Iyyer, M., Gardner, M., Clark, C., Lee, K., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n18-1202 · Cited by 11,983 · cited 1×
“Tay et al. (2022) use control codes to switch be-tween three de-noising modes during pre-training, and associate every downstream task with a mode during fine-tuning.”
Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer
Raffel, C., Shazeer, N., Roberts, A., Lee, K., Narang, S., Matena, M., Zhou, Y., Li, W., & Liu, P. J. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.10683 · Cited by 10,929 · cited 6×
“Aribandi et al. (2022) pre-train T5 (Raffel et al., 2020) on C4 span denoising and 107 other tasks across 8 task families.”
InfluentialDistributed Representations of Sentences and DocumentsPreprint
Le, Q. V., & Mikolov, T. (2014) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1405.4053 · Cited by 7,905 · cited 1×
“Representing Scientific Documents Prior works have produced large scale language models pre-trained on scientific corpora (Beltagy et al., 2019; Yasunaga et al., 2022; Trewartha et al., 2022).”
SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Text
Beltagy, I., Lo, K., & Cohan, A. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP) · doi:10.18653/v1/d19-1371 · Cited by 3,218 · cited 8×
“Among the vanilla models, even though E5 v2 and MPNet perform better than SciBERT; SPECTER, SciNCL and SPECTER2 Base outperform them suggesting the need for domain and task specific embeddings to do well on SciRepE-val.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationSimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddings
Gao, T., Yao, X., & Chen, D. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2021.emnlp-main.552 · Cited by 2,851 · cited 2×
“, 2020)) can be tailored to produce high-quality representations of documents with contrastive learning (Xu et al., 2021; Gao et al., 2021; Neelakantan et al., 2022).”
BackgroundParameter-efficient transfer learning for NLP
Houlsby, N., Giurgiu, A., Jastrzebski, S., Morrone, B., de Laroussilhe, Q., Gesmundo, A., Attariyan, M., & Gelly, S. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1902.00751 · Cited by 2,270 · cited 1×
“Adapters for Multiple Tasks Adapters were introduced by Houlsby et al. (2019) for parameter efficient training of transformers (Vaswani et al., 2017).”
Method
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Amit Bagga and Breck Baldwin. 1998. Algorithms for scoring coreference chains. In The first international conference on language resources and evaluation workshop on linguistics coreference.
- PMLR.
- Winston Haynes. 2013. Tukey's Test, pages 2303-2304. Springer New York, New York, NY. · DOI
- PMLR.
- Carolyn E Lipscomb. 2000. Medical subject headings (mesh). Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, 88(3):265.
- Ilya Loshchilov and Frank Hutter. 2019. Decoupled weight decay regularization. In International Confer- ence on Learning Representations (ICLR).
- Asa Cooper Stickland and Iain Murray. 2019. BERT and PALs: Projected attention layers for efficient adaptation in multi-task learning. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learn- ing, volume 97 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pages 5986-5995.
- PMLR.
- Marco Valenzuela, Vu A. Ha, and Oren Etzioni. 2015. Identifying meaningful citations. In AAAI Workshop: Scholarly Big Data.
- Ellen Voorhees, Tasmeer Alam, Steven Bedrick, Dina Demner-Fushman, William R. Hersh, Kyle Lo, Kirk Roberts, Ian Soboroff, and Lucy Lu Wang. 2021. Trec-covid: Constructing a pandemic information retrieval test collection. SIGIR Forum, 54(1). · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–236 of 236
Topic Is Not Agenda: A Citation-Community Audit of Text Embeddings
Yoo, J. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.07158
“Within scientific embeddings, SPECTER [Cohan et al., 2020], SPECTER2 [Singh et al., 2023], and SciNCL [Osten-dorff et al., 2022] use direct citations as a contrastive training signal; one of our findings is that this training does not transfer to cosine neighborhoods that match a well-constructed…”
Dtour: a Steerable Tour De Vis through High-dimensional Data
Lekschas, F., & Abdennur, N. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.04306
“To compare embedding models, we construct a sequential tour from 3M arXiv title-abstract embeddings produced by four models spanning 2023– 2026: SPECTER2 [35], BGE-M3 [11], Nomic Embed Text v2 [30], and F2LLM-v2-8B [47] (top-ranked on clustering benchmarks), each reduced to 2D with default UMAP.”
Enhancing Scholarly Knowledge Graphs via Domain-Specific Entity Detection and Linking
Duran-Silva, N., Parra-Rojas, C., Accuosto, P., Moreno-Schneider, J., & Rehm, G. (2026) · NSLP@LREC · doi:10.63317/43szrv2r8njb
“Our model selection considers general-purpose language models (RoBERTa-base and RoBERTa-large (Liu et al., 2019)), and scientific language models pre-trained on academic documents (SPECTER2 (Cohan et al., 2020; Singh et al., 2022) and ScholarBERT (Hong et al., 2022)).”
Choi, S. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.23699
“We ship the three-component hybrid (whitened SPECTER2 plus concept TF-IDF plus venue LDA) rather than raw SPECTER2, even though a small ablation we ran on this corpus gives raw a roughly one-to two-percentage-point edge on phantom-collaborator precision at 𝐾 = 20 .”
InfluentialMasterSet: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Must-Cite Citation Recommendation in the AI/ML Literature
Ratul, M. T. R., Chen, Z.-Q., Fu, K., Ji, T., & Zhang, L. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.17680
“A fundamental limitation of all these systems is that they optimise for topical relevance : any cited paper is a positive label, with no distinction be-tween a core experimental baseline and tangential background.”
Matching Researchers to Funding Calls: A Reproducible Institution-Level FrameworkPreprint
Arroyo‐Machado, W., Lázaro-Soraluce, L., Ortega-Sevilla, C., Fuente-Gutiérrez, E., & Torres‐Salinas, D. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.06321
Interactive Evidence Maps for Visualizing and Understanding Systematic Reviews
Mallavarapu, A., Khandare, R., Kadiyala, M., Yaddanapudi, N., Schroeder, N. L., Zhang, S., & Gladstone, J. R. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.28802
“BERTopic and its scientific variants (e.g, SciBERT [24], Specter2 [25]) represents a more recent advancement in topic modeling post their not very sophisticated semantic predecessor LSA (Latent Semantic Analysis) [26].”
PI-Embedding: Scientific Idea Representation Learning via Citation Intent and Paper Provenance
Wang, C., & Sun, Z. (2026) · 2026 International Conference on Generative Artificial Intelligence and Information Security (GAIIS) · doi:10.1109/gaiis69281.2026.11519295
Building a Test Collection for Social Science Dataset Retrieval
Kim, J. E., Lafia, S., & Hemphill, L. (2026) · Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3786304.3787949
“To reduce the costs of human annotation and obtain high-quality relevance assessments, some studies have leveraged indirect relevance signals, such as citation data, treating authors as implicit annotators who indicate relevance through their citations [14, 20].”
Galán-Mena, J., Nores, M. L., Pulla-Sánchez, D., Guerrero-Vásquez, L. F., & Salgado-Guerrero, J. P. (2026) · Inf. · doi:10.3390/info17030254
Fang, Q., Li, Y.-F., Wu, J., Long, Y., Hu, J., & Qian, S.-S. (2026) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2026.115711
UniFAR: A Unified Facet-Aware Retrieval Framework for Scientific DocumentsPreprint
Dou, Z., Zhang, Z., Wang, D., Ban, Y., & Zhuang, F. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.23766 · Cited by 1
“Fine-Grained.”
Khan, T., Ansarullah, George, J., Tomalka, J., Sekaly, R., Palucka, K., & Chaussabel, D. (2026) · bioRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.01.22.701191
“SPECTER2 embeddings of 191,570 sepsis-related text nodes were projected to two dimensions using PCA followed by UMAP and clustered with the Leiden algorithm.”
Can Instructed Retrieval Models Really Support Exploration?
Maheshwari, P., Mysore, S., & Zamani, H. (2026) · Conference on Human Information Interaction and Retrieval · doi:10.1145/3786304.3787888
Generating Survey Hint-Net from Multiple Academic Papers with Cite-Clues
Li, J., Sheng, R., Gu, D., & Hasegawa, S. (2025) · International Conference on Modern Educational Technology (ICMET) · doi:10.1109/icmet67594.2025.11451801
“Furthermore, it explicitly models citation links as signals of deeper semantic relatedness between documents [18].”
InfluentialShae, W., Saif, M. S. I., Fife, J., Mudaranthakam, D. P., Pei, D., Harlan-Williams, L. M., Thompson, J. A., & Koestler, D. C. (2025) · JAMIA Open · doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaf156
A hidden network of gene relationships unifies behavioral and molecular researchPreprint
Connell, D. R., Gaiteri, C., & Tasaki, S. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.11.14.688547
“After training, we chose our fine-tune of the Specter2 model, which was initially trained entirely on scientific literature from the Semantic Scholar database [8].”
Xi, S., Pi, O., Zhang, M.-M., Xiong, B., Lane, J. N., & Shah, N. B. (2025) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.12692
“The best-performing algorithms for assigning reviewers to papers in peer review (OpenRe-view 2025), such as SPECTER2 (Singh et al. 2023) and SciNCL (Ostendorff et al. 2022), crucially rely on citation networks and past publications.”
From Funding to Findings (FIND): An Open Database of NSF Awards and Research Outputs
Smith, K., Lu, Y.-C., & Fan, Q.-C. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.10336
“We generate dense embeddings from award text using SPECTER2 [Singh et al., 2022], a powerful science-domain adapted embedding model.”
Ascione, G. S., & Tamagnone, N. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.09303 · Cited by 2
“In contrast, PAT-SPECTER is based on SPECTER2 (Singh et al., 2022), a transformer model pretrained on scientific articles using citation supervision, and is similarly fine-tuned on examiner citation triplets to adapt it to the patent domain.”
HST-Rep: Hierarchical Semantic Representation Learning for Scientific Papers
Liao, J., Du, Z., & Liu, X.-X. (2025) · Data Intelligence · doi:10.3724/2096-7004.di.2025.0123
“For example, Cohan et al.[18] and Singh et al.[19] developed the SPECTER framework series, which uses citation graphs to build triplet supervision signals and trains SciBERT [20] to obtain high-quality document representations with strong transferability.”
Gender and Discipline Shape Length, Content and Tone of Grant Peer Review Reports
Müller, S., Okasa, G., Strinzel, M., Jorstad, A., Milzow, K., & Egger, M. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.00103
“SPECTER2 is a transformer model pre-trained on scientific texts and is suitable for various NLP tasks involving academic texts [35].”
Extracting Information About Publication Venues Using Citation-Informed Transformers
Zimmerman, B. D., Folkins, J., & Vechtomova, O. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.08199
“Services such as the Semantic Scholar literature graph (Ammar et al., 2018) rely on embeddings produced by SPECTER-2 (Singh et al., 2022 relationship between scientific documents and construct literature feeds for researchers that align with their interests.”
No Stupid Questions: An Analysis of Question Query Generation for Citation Recommendation
Zimmerman, B. D., Aubert-Béduchaud, J., Boudin, F., Aizawa, A., & Vechtomova, O. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.08196
“We encode each query with the SPECTER-2 ad-hoc query adapter and recorded the top 50 results when queried against the index.”
Missing vs. Unused Knowledge Hypothesis for Language Model Bottlenecks in Patent Understanding
Wu, S.-Y., Bao, H.-L., Kunievsky, N., & Evans, J. A. (2025) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.12452
“We embed both the questions and text chunks using the SPECTER2 model (Singh et al., 2023) specifically for scientific documents pretrained on 4 See Appendix E for full prompts. citation relations, compute cosine similarity, and select the top three relevant chunks per question.”
Dasgupta, S., Sharma, H., Patel, D., Desai, P., & Roy, A. (2025) · AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v39i22.34545
“In recent years, SPECTER-RM (Cohan et al. 2020) and its latest version, SPECTER2-RM (Singh et al. 2023b), generate embeddings of scientific papers using citation-aware fine-tuning on SciBERT.”
Xu, J., Sembay, Z., Thaker, S., Payne‐Foster, P., Chen, J. Y., & Ding, Y. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2501.09909 · Cited by 3
“Utilizing semantic information from paper titles and abstracts [13], our system maps a two-dimensional semantic space, indicating the relative positions of researchers and datasets within the CM4AI knowledge domain.”
InfluentialTOPICAL: TOPIC Pages AutomagicaLly
Giorgi, J., Singh, A., Downey, D., Feldman, S., & Wang, L. L. (2024) · North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.01796
Self-citationTobaly, L., & Zalevsky, Z. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3674233
“SPECTER introduced citation-supervised transformer representations for scientific papers [1], SciNCL improved robustness via neighborhood contrastive learning [2], and subsequent benchmarks have consolidated best practices for scientific representation evaluation [3].”
Training Biomedical Retrievers From Large-Scale Citation Contexts
Wang, X., Thanh, D. L., & Leser, U. (2026) · BioNLP@ACL · doi:10.18653/v1/2026.bionlp-1.7
Persistence Paradox in Dynamic Science
Bao, H.-L., & Li, K. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.22729
Can we Predict Innovation? Narrow Experts Versus Competent Generalists
Hazem, A., & Motohashi, K. (2025) · International conference Recent advances in natural language processing · doi:10.26615/978-954-452-098-4-050
“We also use the recent Specter2 version (Singh et al., 2022).”
Beyond Retrieval: Topic-based Alignment of Scientific Papers to Research Proposal
Palit, R., Patwardhan, M. S., Vig, L., & Shroff, G. M. (2024) · SDP · doi:10.18653/v1/2024.sdp-1.7
“For the evidence retrieval task with QASPER, Specter 2 is used with the AdHoc Query Adapter for questions and the Proximity Adapter for paragraphs (Singh et al., 2022).”
MethodWeQA: A Benchmark for Retrieval Augmented Generation in Wind Energy DomainPreprint
Meyur, R., Phan, H., Wagle, S., Strube, J., Halappanavar, M. M., Horawalavithana, S., Acharya, A., & Munikoti, S. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.11800 · Cited by 3
“While scientific benchmarks such as MMLU (Hendrycks et al., 2020), SciBench (Wang et al., 2023), SciQ (Welbl et al., 2017), SciRepE-val (Singh et al., 2022), SciQA (Auer et al., 2023), and QASA (Lee et al., 2023) are used for multi-disciplinary scientific QA evaluations, field-specific benchmarks…”
Gender differences in early semantic trajectories and academic career persistence
Hu, L., Yang, A. J., & Deng, S. (2026) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2026.105142
Assisting Human Decisions in Document Matching
Kim, J. S., Chen, V., Pruthi, D., Shah, N. B., & Talwalkar, A. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.08450 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Singh, A., D'Arcy, M., Cohan, A., Downey, D., & Feldman, S.
- Affiliations
- Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence (US)
- Yale University (US)
- Northwestern University (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- Pages
- 5548-5566
- arXiv
- 2211.13308
- OpenAlex
- W4389524502
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 81
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 7
- FWCI
- 13.58
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2033558)
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- benchmark, task generalization, multi-task learning, task-specific adapters, control codes, specters, document classification, document ranking, document retrieval
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review