The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Make RepVGG Greater Again: A Quantization-aware Approach
Open accessAbstract
The tradeoff between performance and inference speed is critical for practical applications. Architecture reparameterization obtains better tradeoffs and it is becoming an increasingly popular ingredient in modern convolutional neural networks. Nonetheless, its quantization performance is usually too poor to deploy (more than 20% top-1 accuracy drop on ImageNet) when INT8 inference is desired. In this paper, we dive into the underlying mechanism of this failure, where the original design inevitably enlarges quantization error. We propose a simple, robust, and effective remedy to have a quantization-friendly structure that also enjoys reparameterization benefits. Our method greatly bridges the gap between INT8 and FP32 accuracy for RepVGG. Without bells and whistles, the top-1 accuracy drop on ImageNet is reduced within 2% by standard post-training quantization. Moreover, our method also achieves similar FP32 performance as RepVGG. Extensive experiments on detection and semantic segmentation tasks verify its generalization.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
QSP and QCI were inspired by frameworks like RepVGG.
“These innovations were inspired by frameworks like RepVGG and aimed to address the common challenges associated with post-training quantization, specifically the loss of accuracy that typically accompanies such optimization techniques [135].”
From The YOLO Framework: A Comprehensive Review of Evolution, Applications, and Benchmarks in Object Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [135]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Rep ViT: Revisiting Mobile CNN From ViT Perspective
Wang, A., Chen, H., Lin, Z., Han, J., & Ding, G. (2024) · 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr52733.2024.01506 · Cited by 752
Ali, M. L., & Zhang, Z. (2024) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers13120336 · Cited by 383
Metadata
- Authors
- Chu, X., Li, L., & Zhang, B.
- Affiliations
- Meituan (China) (CN)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2022
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 11624-11632
- ISSN
- 2159-5399 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2212.01593
- OpenAlex
- W4393157004
- Cited by
- 53
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 8
- FWCI
- 9.29
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- AAAI Publications (The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI)) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning and Data Classification
- Keywords
- RepVGG, quantization-aware training, post-training quantization, quantization error, speed-accuracy trade-off, lightweight convolutional neural network, object detection, semantic segmentation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review