The DOI matches its DataCite record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Target specific peptide design using latent space approximate trajectory collector
Abstract
Despite the prevalence and many successes of deep learning applications in de novo molecular design, the problem of peptide generation targeting specific proteins remains unsolved. A main barrier for this is the scarcity of the high-quality training data. To tackle the issue, we propose a novel machine learning based peptide design architecture, called Latent Space Approximate Trajectory Collector (LSATC). It consists of a series of samplers on an optimization trajectory on a highly non-convex energy landscape that approximates the distributions of peptides with desired properties in a latent space. The process involves little human intervention and can be implemented in an end-to-end manner. We demonstrate the model by the design of peptide extensions targeting Beta-catenin, a key nuclear effector protein involved in canonical Wnt signalling. When compared with a random sampler, LSATC can sample peptides with $36\%$ lower binding scores in a $16$ times smaller interquartile range (IQR) and $284\%$ less hydrophobicity with a $1.4$ times smaller IQR. LSATC also largely outperforms other common generative models. Finally, we utilized a clustering algorithm to select 4 peptides from the 100 LSATC designed peptides for experimental validation. The result confirms that all the four peptides extended by LSATC show improved Beta-catenin binding by at least $20.0\%$, and two of the peptides show a $3$ fold increase in binding affinity as compared to the base peptide.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Metadata
- Authors
- Lin, T., Chen, S., Basu, R., Pei, D., Cheng, X., & Kara, L. B.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- arXiv
- 2302.01435
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Target specific peptide design using latent space approximate trajectory collector. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.48550/arxiv.2302.01435
- The paper
- Lin, T., Chen, S., Basu, R., Pei, D., Cheng, X., & Kara, L. B. (2023). Target specific peptide design using latent space approximate trajectory collector. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arxiv.2302.01435
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.