ManiSkill2: A Unified Benchmark for Generalizable Manipulation Skills
Open accessAbstract
Generalizable manipulation skills, which can be composed to tackle long-horizon and complex daily chores, are one of the cornerstones of Embodied AI. However, existing benchmarks, mostly composed of a suite of simulatable environments, are insufficient to push cutting-edge research works because they lack object-level topological and geometric variations, are not based on fully dynamic simulation, or are short of native support for multiple types of manipulation tasks. To this end, we present ManiSkill2, the next generation of the SAPIEN ManiSkill benchmark, to address critical pain points often encountered by researchers when using benchmarks for generalizable manipulation skills. ManiSkill2 includes 20 manipulation task families with 2000+ object models and 4M+ demonstration frames, which cover stationary/mobile-base, single/dual-arm, and rigid/soft-body manipulation tasks with 2D/3D-input data simulated by fully dynamic engines. It defines a unified interface and evaluation protocol to support a wide range of algorithms (e.g., classic sense-plan-act, RL, IL), visual observations (point cloud, RGBD), and controllers (e.g., action type and parameterization). Moreover, it empowers fast visual input learning algorithms so that a CNN-based policy can collect samples at about 2000 FPS with 1 GPU and 16 processes on a regular workstation. It implements a render server infrastructure to allow sharing rendering resources across all environments, thereby significantly reducing memory usage. We open-source all codes of our benchmark (simulator, environments, and baselines) and host an online challenge open to interdisciplinary researchers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some works have collected large datasets using pre-programmed demonstrators in simulation.
“Some works have collected large datasets using pre-programmed demonstrators in simulation [18-22]”
From MimicGen: A Data Generation System for Scalable Robot Learning using Human Demonstrations (2023) · cites this paper as [21]
RoboCasa supports room-scale scenes, unlike other frameworks that include mobile manipulation in smaller portions of a room.
“RoboCasa also supports room-scale scenes, unlike other frameworks that include mobile manipulation in smaller portions of a room [10, 34].”
From RoboCasa: Large-Scale Simulation of Everyday Tasks for Generalist Robots (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
RoboCasa supports photorealistic rendering and multiple robot embodiments.
“RoboCasa is one of the few frameworks to feature photorealistic rendering [21, 40, 27, 10, 6] and multiple robot embodiments [21, 26, 27, 6, 34].”
From RoboCasa: Large-Scale Simulation of Everyday Tasks for Generalist Robots (2024) · cites this paper as [10]
Point-level affordance may be more suitable than sampling-based planners for manipulating articulated objects within complex constraints, because it directly provides per-point actionable priors.
“Comparisons between RTT-CA and affordance methods show that, while sampling-based planners may face difficulty in complicated scenes, point-level affordance may be more suitable by directly providing per-point actionable priors for manipulating articulated objects within complex constraints.”
From Learning Environment-Aware Affordance for 3D Articulated Object Manipulation under Occlusions (2023) · cites this paper as [8]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
TD-MPC2: Scalable, Robust World Models for Continuous Control
Hansen, N., Su, H., & Wang, X. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.16828 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
“We evaluate TD-MPC 2 across a total of 104 diverse continuous control tasks spanning 4 task domains: DMControl (Tassa et al., 2018), Meta-World (Yu et al., 2019), ManiSkill2 (Gu et al., 2023), and MyoSuite (Caggiano et al., 2022).”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationFOCUS: object-centric world models for robotic manipulation
Ferraro, S., Mazzaglia, P., Verbelen, T., & Dhoedt, B. (2025) · Frontiers in Neurorobotics · doi:10.3389/fnbot.2025.1585386 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“We adopt 10 tasks from three robotic manipulation benchmarks (shown in Figure 2): ManiSkill2 (Gu et al., 2023), robosuite (Zhu et al., 2020) and Metaworld (Yu et al., 2019).”
Learning Environment-Aware Affordance for 3D Articulated Object Manipulation under Occlusions
Wu, R., Cheng, K., Shen, Y., Ning, C., Zhan, G., & Dong, H. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.07510 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
“Moreover, we compare our method with Collision Avoidance RTT Planner ( RTT-CA ) [19, 35, 8], a commonly used sampling-based planner for robotic manipulation, to demonstrate the capability of point-level affordance in guiding manipulation in complicated scenes.”
GR00T N1: An Open Foundation Model for Generalist Humanoid Robots
NVIDIA, :, Bjorck, J., Castañeda, F., Cherniadev, N., Da, X., Ding, R., Fan, L. "., Fang, Y., Fox, D., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.14734 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
MimicGen: A Data Generation System for Scalable Robot Learning using Human Demonstrations
Mandlekar, A., Nasiriany, S., Wen, B., Akinola, I., Narang, Y., Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Fox, D. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.17596 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Evaluating Real-World Robot Manipulation Policies in Simulation
Li, X., Hsu, K., Gu, J., Pertsch, K., Mees, O., Walke, H. R., Fu, C., Lunawat, I., Sieh, I., Kirmani, S., et al. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.05941 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
“That is, if one policy performs better than another in real-world 1] , higher is better) for assessing the correlation between policy performances in real-world and simulation, as well as the overall quality of simulated evaluation pipelines.”
Self-citationRoboCasa: Large-Scale Simulation of Everyday Tasks for Generalist Robots
Nasiriany, S., Maddukuri, A., Zhang, L., Parikh, A., Lo, A., Joshi, A., Mandlekar, A., & Zhu, Y. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.02523 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
“RoboCasa is one of the few frameworks to feature photorealistic rendering [21, 40, 27, 10, 6] and multiple robot embodiments [21, 26, 27, 6, 34].”
BackgroundInfluentialDreamGen: Unlocking Generalization in Robot Learning through Video World Models
Jang, J., Ye, S., Lin, Z., Xiang, J., Bjorck, J., Fang, Y., Hu, F., Huang, S., Kundalia, K., Lin, Y.-C., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.12705 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gu, J., Xiang, F., Li, X., Ling, Z., Liu, X., Mu, T., Tang, Y., Tao, S., Wei, X., Yao, Y., Yuan, X., Xie, P., Huang, Z., Chen, R., & Su, H.
- Affiliations
- University of California San Diego (US)
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- ORCID
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2302.04659
- OpenAlex
- W4320165654
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
- Keywords
- embodied AI, robotic manipulation, dynamic simulation, multi-arm robots, demonstration data, evaluation protocol, online challenges
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review