PreprintCited by 23Robot Manipulation and LearningReinforcement Learning in RoboticsSoft Robotics and Applications

ManiSkill2: A Unified Benchmark for Generalizable Manipulation Skills

Open access
Gu, Jiayuan, Xiang, Fanbo, Li, Xuanlin, Ling, Zhan, Liu, Xiqiang, Mu, Tongzhou, Tang, Yihe, Tao, Stone +7 more·2023·arXiv

Abstract

Generalizable manipulation skills, which can be composed to tackle long-horizon and complex daily chores, are one of the cornerstones of Embodied AI. However, existing benchmarks, mostly composed of a suite of simulatable environments, are insufficient to push cutting-edge research works because they lack object-level topological and geometric variations, are not based on fully dynamic simulation, or are short of native support for multiple types of manipulation tasks. To this end, we present ManiSkill2, the next generation of the SAPIEN ManiSkill benchmark, to address critical pain points often encountered by researchers when using benchmarks for generalizable manipulation skills. ManiSkill2 includes 20 manipulation task families with 2000+ object models and 4M+ demonstration frames, which cover stationary/mobile-base, single/dual-arm, and rigid/soft-body manipulation tasks with 2D/3D-input data simulated by fully dynamic engines. It defines a unified interface and evaluation protocol to support a wide range of algorithms (e.g., classic sense-plan-act, RL, IL), visual observations (point cloud, RGBD), and controllers (e.g., action type and parameterization). Moreover, it empowers fast visual input learning algorithms so that a CNN-based policy can collect samples at about 2000 FPS with 1 GPU and 16 processes on a regular workstation. It implements a render server infrastructure to allow sharing rendering resources across all environments, thereby significantly reducing memory usage. We open-source all codes of our benchmark (simulator, environments, and baselines) and host an online challenge open to interdisciplinary researchers.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.2302.04659

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some works have collected large datasets using pre-programmed demonstrators in simulation.

    “Some works have collected large datasets using pre-programmed demonstrators in simulation [18-22]”
  • RoboCasa supports room-scale scenes, unlike other frameworks that include mobile manipulation in smaller portions of a room.

    “RoboCasa also supports room-scale scenes, unlike other frameworks that include mobile manipulation in smaller portions of a room [10, 34].”
  • RoboCasa supports photorealistic rendering and multiple robot embodiments.

    “RoboCasa is one of the few frameworks to feature photorealistic rendering [21, 40, 27, 10, 6] and multiple robot embodiments [21, 26, 27, 6, 34].”
  • Point-level affordance may be more suitable than sampling-based planners for manipulating articulated objects within complex constraints, because it directly provides per-point actionable priors.

    “Comparisons between RTT-CA and affordance methods show that, while sampling-based planners may face difficulty in complicated scenes, point-level affordance may be more suitable by directly providing per-point actionable priors for manipulating articulated objects within complex constraints.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gu, J., Xiang, F., Li, X., Ling, Z., Liu, X., Mu, T., Tang, Y., Tao, S., Wei, X., Yao, Y., Yuan, X., Xie, P., Huang, Z., Chen, R., & Su, H.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Tsinghua University (CN)
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2023
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4320165654
Cited by
23
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 1
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Robot Manipulation and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Reinforcement Learning in Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Soft Robotics and Applications
Keywords
embodied AI, robotic manipulation, dynamic simulation, multi-arm robots, demonstration data, evaluation protocol, online challenges

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review