The DOI matches its DataCite record; its reference list is not available.
Mid-circuit measurements on a single species neutral alkali atom quantum processor
Open accessAbstract
We demonstrate mid-circuit measurements in a neutral atom array by shelving data qubits in protected hyperfine-Zeeman sub-states while non-destructively measuring an ancilla qubit. Measurement fidelity was enhanced using microwave repumping of the ancilla during the measurement. The coherence of the shelved data qubits was extended during the ancilla readout with dynamical decoupling pulses, after which the data qubits are returned to mf = 0 computational basis states. We demonstrate that the quantum state of the data qubits is well preserved up to a constant phase shift with a state preparation and measurement (SPAM) corrected process fidelity of F = 97.0(5)%. The measurement fidelity on the ancilla qubit after correction for state preparation errors is F = 94.9(8)% and F = 95.3(1.1)% for |0> and |1> qubit states, respectively. We discuss extending this technique to repetitive quantum error correction using quadrupole recooling and microwave-based quantum state resetting.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Mid-circuit measurements have recently been demonstrated in a cold atom setup.
“Recently, also mid-circuit measurements have been demonstrated in a cold atom setup [32].”
From Neutral atom quantum computing hardware: performance and end-user perspective (2023) · cites this paper as [32]
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 57 · Cited by 81
Metadata
- Authors
- Graham, T. M., Phuttitarn, L., Chinnarasu, R., Song, Y., Poole, C., Jooya, K., Scott, J., Scott, A., Eichler, P., & Saffman, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 2160-3308 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2303.10051
- OpenAlex
- W4389794602
- Cited by
- 81
- References
- 57
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 5
- FWCI
- 9.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Physical Review X (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2016136, 2210437)
- U.S. Department of Energy (DESC0019465)
- Office of Science (DESC0019465)
- High Energy Physics (DE-SC0019465)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum optics and atomic interactions
- Keywords
- quantum memory, hyperfine states, ancilla qubits, atom arrays, quantum processors, qubit lifetime
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review