DBLP-QuAD: A Question Answering Dataset over the DBLP Scholarly Knowledge Graph
Open accessAbstract
In this work we create a question answering dataset over the DBLP scholarly knowledge graph (KG). DBLP is an on-line reference for bibliographic information on major computer science publications that indexes over 4.4 million publications published by more than 2.2 million authors. Our dataset consists of 10,000 question answer pairs with the corresponding SPARQL queries which can be executed over the DBLP KG to fetch the correct answer. DBLP-QuAD is the largest scholarly question answering dataset.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
DBLP-QuAD contains 10,000 QA pairs generated via SPARQL queries over the DBLP scholarly knowledge graph.
“One notable dataset is DBLP-QuAD (Banerjee et al., 2023), which contains 10,000 QA pairs generated via SPARQL queries over the DBLP scholarly knowledge graph (KG).”
From YESciEval: Robust LLM-as-a-Judge for Scientific Question Answering (2025) · cites this paper as Banerjee et al., 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- K. Bollacker, C. Evans, P. Paritosh, T. Sturge, J. Taylor, Freebase: A Collaboratively Created Graph Database for Structuring Human Knowledge, in: Proceedings of the 2008 ACM SIGMOD international conference on Management of data, AcM, 2008, pp. 1247-1250.
- Vrandečić, Denny and Krötzsch, Markus, Wikidata: A Free Collaborative Knowledge Base, Communications of the ACM (2014).
- M. Dubey, S. Dasgupta, A. Sharma, K. Höffner, J. Lehmann, AskNow: A Framework for Natural Language Query Formalization in SPARQL, in: H. Sack, E. Blomqvist, M. d'Aquin, C. Ghidini, S. P. Ponzetto, C. Lange (Eds.), The Semantic Web. Latest Advances and New Domains, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016, pp. 300-316.
- N. Chakraborty, D. Lukovnikov, G. Maheshwari, P. Trivedi, J. Lehmann, A. Fischer, Intro- duction to Neural Network based Approaches for Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs, 2019. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1907.09361. doi:10.48550/ARXIV.1907.09361. · DOI
- A. Perevalov, X. Yan, L. Kovriguina, L. Jiang, A. Both, R. Usbeck, Knowledge Graph Question Answering Leaderboard: A Community Resource to Prevent a Replication Crisis, in: Proceedings of the Thirteenth Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, European Language Resources Association, Marseille, France, 2022, pp. 2998-3007. URL: https: //aclanthology.org/2022.lrec-1.321.
- M. Y. Jaradeh, M. Stocker, S. Auer, Question answering on scholarly knowledge graphs, in: International Conference on Theory and Practice of Digital Libraries, Springer, 2020, pp. 19-32.
- P. Rajpurkar, R. Jia, P. Liang, Know what you don't know: Unanswerable questions for SQuAD, arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.03822 (2018). · arXiv
- T. Kwiatkowski, J. Palomaki, O. Redfield, M. Collins, A. Parikh, C. Alberti, D. Epstein, I. Polosukhin, J. Devlin, K. Lee, et al., Natural questions: a benchmark for question answering research, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 7 (2019) 453-466.
- P. Trivedi, G. Maheshwari, M. Dubey, J. Lehmann, LC-QuAD: A Corpus for Complex Question Answering over Knowledge Graphs, in: C. d'Amato, M. Fernandez, V. Tamma, F. Lecue, P. Cudré-Mauroux, J. Sequeda, C. Lange, J. Heflin (Eds.), The Semantic Web - ISWC 2017, volume 10588, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2017, pp. 210-218. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-68204-4_22. · DOI · Paper page
- P. Sen, A. F. Aji, A. Saffari, Mintaka: A Complex, Natural, and Multilingual Dataset for End-to-End Question Answering, arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.01613 (2022). · arXiv
- Q. Cai, A. Yates, Large-scale semantic parsing via schema matching and lexicon exten- sion, in: Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), 2013, pp. 423-433.
- R. Usbeck, A.-C. N. Ngomo, B. Haarmann, A. Krithara, M. Röder, G. Napolitano, 7th Open Challenge on Question Answering over Linked Data (QALD-7), in: M. Dragoni, M. Solanki, E. Blomqvist (Eds.), Semantic Web Challenges, volume 769, Springer International Publish- ing, Cham, 2017, pp. 59-69. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-69146-6_6. · DOI
- W.-t. Yih, M. Richardson, C. Meek, M.-W. Chang, J. Suh, The Value of Semantic Parse Labeling for Knowledge Base Question Answering, in: Proceedings of the 54th An- nual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Pa- pers), Association for Computational Linguistics, Berlin, Germany, 2016, pp. 201-206. doi:10.18653/v1/P16-2033. · DOI
- A. Talmor, J. Berant, The Web as a Knowledge-base for Answering Complex Questions, 2018. arXiv:1803.06643. · arXiv
- J. Berant, A. Chou, R. Frostig, P. Liang, Semantic Parsing on Freebase from Question- Answer Pairs, in: Proceedings of the 2013 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing, 2013, pp. 1533-1544.
- Y. Wang, J. Berant, P. Liang, Building a semantic parser overnight, in: Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), 2015, pp. 1332-1342.
- Y. Su, H. Sun, B. Sadler, M. Srivatsa, I. Gur, Z. Yan, X. Yan, On Generating Characteristic- rich Question Sets for QA Evaluation, in: Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Association for Computational Linguistics, Austin, Texas, 2016, pp. 562-572. doi:10.18653/v1/D16-1054. · DOI
- M. Dubey, D. Banerjee, A. Abdelkawi, J. Lehmann, LC-QuAD 2.0: A Large Dataset for Complex Question Answering over Wikidata and DBpedia, in: C. Ghidini, O. Hartig, M. Maleshkova, V. Svátek, I. Cruz, A. Hogan, J. Song, M. Lefrançois, F. Gandon (Eds.), The Semantic Web -ISWC 2019, volume 11779, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2019, pp. 69-78. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30796-7_5. · DOI
- Y. Gu, S. Kase, M. Vanni, B. Sadler, P. Liang, X. Yan, Y. Su, Beyond I.I.D.: Three Levels of Generalization for Question Answering on Knowledge Bases, in: Proceedings of the Web Conference 2021, ACM, Ljubljana Slovenia, 2021, pp. 3477-3488. doi:10.1145/3442381. 3449992. · DOI
- S. Cao, J. Shi, L. Pan, L. Nie, Y. Xiang, L. Hou, J. Li, B. He, H. Zhang, KQA pro: A dataset with explicit compositional programs for complex question answering over knowledge base, in: Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Association for Computational Linguistics, Dublin, Ireland, 2022, pp. 6101-6119. doi:10. 18653/v1/2022.AssociationforComputationalLinguistics-long.422. · DOI
- D. Keysers, N. Schärli, N. Scales, H. Buisman, D. Furrer, S. Kashubin, N. Momchev, D. Sinopalnikov, L. Stafiniak, T. Tihon, D. Tsarkov, X. Wang, M. van Zee, O. Bousquet, Measuring Compositional Generalization: A Comprehensive Method on Realistic Data, 2020. arXiv:1912.09713. · arXiv
- M. Ley, The DBLP Computer Science Bibliography: Evolution, Research Issues, Perspec- tives, in: G. Goos, J. Hartmanis, J. van Leeuwen, A. H. F. Laender, A. L. Oliveira (Eds.), String Processing and Information Retrieval, volume 2476, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2002, pp. 1-10. doi:10.1007/3-540-45735-6_1. · DOI
- D. Banerjee, P. A. Nair, J. N. Kaur, R. Usbeck, C. Biemann, Modern Baselines for SPARQL Semantic Parsing, in: Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, 2022, pp. 2260-2265. doi:10.1145/ 1-15 3477495.3531841. arXiv:2204.12793. · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
LLM-based SPARQL Query Generation from Natural Language over Federated Knowledge Graphs
Emonet, V., Bolleman, J. T., Duvaud, S., de Farias, T. M., & Sima, A. (2024) · HGAIS@ISWC · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.06062 · Cited by 44
“In the future, we aim to conduct a more comprehensive evaluation using standardised benchmarks[11][12] and benchmarking frameworks[2] to assess the system’s precision, usability, and overall performance across a wider range of queries.”
MethodLeveraging LLMs in Scholarly Knowledge Graph Question Answering
Taffa, T. A., & Usbeck, R. (2023) · QALD/SemREC@ISWC · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.09841 · Cited by 30
“Unlike that, the Scholarly QALD Challenge organized at the ISWC 2023 comes up with two new Scholarly QA data sets, namely SciQA (Scientific QA) [18] and DBLP-QUAD [4]; and provides Codalab [19] as a competition platform.”
MethodSelf-citationNLQxform: A Language Model-based Question to SPARQL Transformer
Wang, R., Zhang, Z., Rossetto, L., Ruosch, F., & Bernstein, A. (2023) · QALD/SemREC@ISWC · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.07588 · Cited by 16
“In the past decade, tremendous efforts [1, 2, 3, 4] have been devoted to organizing scholarly data in the form of knowledge graphs (KGs), which store heterogeneous relational information in an integrated and extensible manner, supporting querying with complex semantics.”
BackgroundGRASP: Generic Reasoning And SPARQL Generation Across Knowledge Graphs
Walter, S., & Bast, H. (2025) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-09527-5_15 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Meloni, A., Recupero, D. R., Osborne, F., Salatino, A. A., Motta, E., Vahdati, S., & Lehmann, J. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · doi:10.1145/3757923 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Dialogue Benchmark Generation from Knowledge Graphs with Cost-Effective Retrieval-Augmented LLMs
Omar, R., Mangukiya, O., & Mansour, E. (2025) · Proc. ACM Manag. Data · doi:10.1145/3709681 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“Hence, our platform achieves significant advancements in dialogue benchmark quality.”
Ontology-Guided, Hybrid Prompt Learning for Generalization in Knowledge Graph Question Answering
Jiang, L., Huang, J.-B., Moller, C., & Usbeck, R. (2025) · International Computer Science Conference · doi:10.1109/icsc64641.2025.00010 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
“Our evaluation uses KGQA datasets derived from heterogeneous KGs, such as Freebase [11], DBpedia [20] and DBLP [21].”
Self-citationKERL: Knowledge-Enhanced Personalized Recipe Recommendation using Large Language Models
Mohbat, F., & Zaki, M. J. (2025) · Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.14629 · Cited by 8
“…subgraphs from KG, uses reasoning to extract entities as answers (Wang et al., 2021), or uses semantic parsing or LLMs in a zero or few shot setting to transform questions into SQL or SPARQL queries to get answers from the KG (Banerjee et al., 2023; Taffa and Usbeck, 2023; Avila et al., 2024).”
PSYCHIC: A Neuro-Symbolic Framework for Knowledge Graph Question-Answering Grounding
Akl, H. A. (2023) · QALD/SemREC@ISWC · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2310.12638 · Cited by 8
“The DBLP computer science bibliography is an example of such an effort that provides open bibliographic information on major computer science journals and proceedings [2].”
BackgroundSPARQL-LLM: Real-Time SPARQL Query Generation from Natural Language Questions
Smeros, P., Emonet, V., Wang, R.-J., Sima, A., & de Farias, T. M. (2025) · ACM Transactions on the Web · doi:10.1145/3847195 · Cited by 7
“Based on DBLP-QuAD, Wang et al. developed NLQxform [28], a transformer-based model that translates scholarly questions into executable SPARQL queries.”
Modelling and Classifying the Components of a Literature Review
Bolanos, F., Salatino, A., Osborne, F., & Motta, E. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2508.04337 · Cited by 5
“…effectively scientometric analyses (Salatino et al., 2020, 2023), intelligent systems for exploring the literature (Angioni et al., 2021), and, increasingly, conversational systems (Meloni et al., 2023) and question-answering methods (Auer et al., 2023; Lehmann et al., 2024; Banerjee et al., 2023).”
BERTologyNavigator: Advanced Question Answering with BERT-based Semantics
Rajpal, S., & Usbeck, R. (2024) · QALD/SemREC@ISWC · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.09553 · Cited by 5
“This is exemplified by the introduction of DBLP-QuAD, a dataset specifically designed for question-answering over the DBLP KG[13].”
MethodSelf-citationDBLPLink: An Entity Linker for the DBLP Scholarly Knowledge Graph
Banerjee, D., Arefa, Usbeck, R., & Biemann, C. (2023) · International Workshop on the Semantic Web · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.07545 · Cited by 5
Self-citationBridging language models and knowledge graphs with controlled natural languages
Bhandiwad, D., Gattogi, P., Kangen, A., Basaldella, M., Ferré, S., Vahdati, S., & Lehmann, J. (2026) · Knowledge-Based Systems · doi:10.1016/j.knosys.2026.115405 · Cited by 4
“Unlike JarvisQA Jaradeh et al. (2020), which relies on converting tabular data into text, and DBLP-QuAD Banerjee et al. (2023) requiring extensive training for new schemas.”
DBLP QuAD 2.0: Scholarly Natural Questions from SPARQL
Taffa, T. A., Neises, P., Ollinger, S., Westphal, P., Ackermann, M. R., Banerjee, D., & Usbeck, R. (2025) · International Conference on Knowledge Capture · doi:10.1145/3731443.3771376 · Cited by 2
“These improvements increase the DBLP usability in KG Question Answering (KGQA) 3 [4].”
InfluentialSelf-citationLLM-powered database migration: A framework for knowledge graph system evolution
Zhao, S., Zhang, Q., & Lan, M. (2025) · Alexandria Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.aej.2025.08.014 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
DBLPLink 2.0 - An Entity Linker for the DBLP Scholarly Knowledge Graph
Banerjee, D., Taffa, T. A., & Usbeck, R. (2025) · International Workshop on the Semantic Web · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.22811 · Cited by 2
“For finding optimal parameters for the different components of the entity linker pipeline, we randomly selected a set of 100 questions from the test set of the DBLP_QuAD dataset [10].”
Self-citationNLQxform-UI: An Interactive and Intuitive Scholarly Question Answering System
Wang, R., Zhang, Z., Rossetto, L., Ruosch, F., & Bernstein, A. (2025) · International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR) · doi:10.1145/3726302.3730153 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“We fine-tuned the adapted BART model using the training set of DBLP-QuAD [3] dataset, which consists of 7,000 pairs of questions and SPARQL queries over the DBLP KG.”
Contri(e)ve: Context + Retrieve for Scholarly Question Answering
Shivashankar, K., & Steinmetz, N. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.09010 · Cited by 2
“The scholarly-QALD dataset is the second iteration of Question Answering dataset for scholarly data, preceded by DBLP-QuAD dataset[3].”
BackgroundMethodText-to-SPARQL Generation with Reinforcement Learning: A GRPO-based Approach on DBLP
Pfeifer, J., Banerjee, D., & Usbeck, R. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.20066 · Cited by 1
“Table 2 shows exact match accuracies across DBLP-QuAD question types.”
InfluentialSelf-citationBioGraphletQA: Knowledge-Anchored Generation of Complex QA Datasets
Jonker, R. A. A., Martins, B. M. R. D. A., & Matos, S. (2026) · European Conference on Information Retrieval · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-21321-1_62 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Traditional KGQA datasets, however, are either manually curated—making them costly and time-intensive [9]—or template-based, which often limits their diversity and generalizability [1].”
KG20C & KG20C-QA: Scholarly Knowledge Graph Benchmarks for Link Prediction and Question Answering
Tran, H.-N., & Takasu, A. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2512.21799 · Cited by 1
“DBLP-QuAD [18] provides one-hop and multi-hop QA benchmarks derived from the DBLP scholarly graph, constructed using query templates and paraphrasing.”
SCIGENT: Multi-agent for End-to-end Question Answering on Scientific Knowledge Graph
Nguyen, D.-H., Le, N.-K., Hasegawa, S., & Nguyen, M. L. (2025) · International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering · doi:10.1109/kse68178.2025.11309536 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“We start with 98 SPARQL and question templates, adapted from prior work [5].”
InfluentialAutomating SPARQL Query Translations between DBpedia and Wikidata
Bartels, M., Banerjee, D., & Usbeck, R. (2025) · International Conference on Semantic Systems · doi:10.3233/ssw250019 · Cited by 1
“A 100-query benchmark was created by adapting data from the DBLP-QuAD dataset [27].”
Self-citationYESciEval: Robust LLM-as-a-Judge for Scientific Question Answering
D'Souza, J., Giglou, H. B., & Münch, Q. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2505.14279
“Additional scientific Q&A datasets fall outside our research scope, such as DBLP-QuAD (Baner-jee et al., 2023) for bibliographic queries and datasets designed to extract factual knowledge from scientific literature for knowledge graph population (Auer et al., 2023; Yan et al., 2024).”
Building Knowledge Graphs for Theses: A Survey
Ruelas, D., Coyla, E., Aceituno, M., & Huaman, E. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2610.28648
“These resources also underpin SPARQL benchmarking, question answering, and recommendation systems [3,43,54].”
InfluentialKGVoyager: Knowledge Graph Agnostic Question Answering via Agentic Navigation
Wisam, E., & Li, C.-K. (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.01780
“DBLP-QuAD is a public question–SPARQL benchmark; we randomly sampled 100 questions from its test split [3].”
Bolaños-Burgos, F., Salatino, A. A., Osborne, F., & Motta, E. (2026) · PeerJ Computer Science · doi:10.7717/peerj-cs.3921 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
AnalyticsGPT: An LLM Workflow for Scientometric Question Answering
Ly, K., Cheirmpos, G., Raudaschl, A., James, C., & Tabatabaei, S. A. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.09817
“We adapt (a subset of) the definitions provided by Banerjee et al. (2023), with some alterations.”
NLQxform-UI: A Natural Language Interface for Querying DBLP Interactively
Wang, R., Zhang, Z., Rossetto, L., Ruosch, F., & Bernstein, A. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2403.08475
“…following the setup of the challenge: We used DBLP KG and 7,000/1,000 training/validation questions (with query and answer annotations) from DBLP-QuAD [2] to develop NLQxform-UI, including fine-tuning the BART model for the first step and constructing the template base for the third step.”
Method
- Authors
- Banerjee, D., Awale, S., Usbeck, R., & Biemann, C.
- Affiliations
- Universität Hamburg (DE)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2303.13351
- OpenAlex
- W4360891214
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Nvidia (RTX A5000)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (460234259)
- Universität Hamburg
- Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Energie (01MK21007)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
- Keywords
- question answering, DBLP, scholarly knowledge graphs, SPARQL queries, bibliographic information, computer science literature, question-answer pairs, knowledge graph question answering
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review