The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Hallucinations in Large Multilingual Translation Models
Open accessAbstract
Large-scale multilingual machine translation systems have demonstrated remarkable ability to translate directly between numerous languages, making them increasingly appealing for real-world applications. However, when deployed in the wild, these models may generate hallucinated translations which have the potential to severely undermine user trust and raise safety concerns. Existing research on hallucinations has primarily focused on small bilingual models trained on high-resource languages, leaving a gap in our understanding of hallucinations in massively multilingual models across diverse translation scenarios. In this work, we fill this gap by conducting a comprehensive analysis on both the M2M family of conventional neural machine translation models and ChatGPT, a general-purpose large language model~(LLM) that can be prompted for translation. Our investigation covers a broad spectrum of conditions, spanning over 100 translation directions across various resource levels and going beyond English-centric language pairs. We provide key insights regarding the prevalence, properties, and mitigation of hallucinations, paving the way towards more responsible and reliable machine translation systems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
LLM results are impressive but highlight inherent limitations, particularly flexibility in transferring knowledge from one set of data to another, which brings about artificial hallucinations.
“Results are impressive, but they also highlight inherent limitations, particularly the flexibility in transferring knowledge from one set of data to another, which also bring about states of ‘artificial hallucinations’”
From Active inference goes to school: the importance of active learning in the age of large language models (2024) · cites this paper as [67]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Huang, L., Yu, W., Ma, W., Zhong, W., Feng, Z., Wang, H., Chen, Q., Peng, W., Feng, X., Qin, B., et al. (2025) · ACM Transactions on Information Systems · doi:10.1145/3703155 · Cited by 4,688
Cognitive Mirage: A Review of Hallucinations in Large Language Models
Ye, H., Liu, T., Zhang, A., Hua, W., & Jia, W. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2309.06794 · Cited by 61
Di Paolo, L. D., White, B., Guénin-Carlut, A., Constant, A., & Clark, A. (2024) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2023.0148 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Guerreiro, N. M., Alves, D., Waldendorf, J., Haddow, B., Birch, A., Colombo, P., & Martins, A. F. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Lisbon (PT)
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Université Paris-Saclay (FR)
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 11
- Pages
- 1500-1517
- ISSN
- 2307-387X (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2303.16104
- OpenAlex
- W4389777735
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 34 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 20
- FWCI
- 11.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- Government of the United Kingdom
- UK Research and Innovation
- European Commission (101070631)
- Grand Équipement National De Calcul Intensif
- HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UIDB/50008, UIDB/50008/2020, -01-0247-, 50008, LISBOA - 01-0247)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › Translation Studies and Practices
- Keywords
- hallucinations, multilingual machine translation, neural machine translation, large language models, low-resource languages, hallucination mitigation, model diversity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review