The DOI matches its DataCite record; 94 of the 128 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Eight Things to Know about Large Language Models
Open accessAbstract
The widespread public deployment of large language models (LLMs) in recent months has prompted a wave of new attention and engagement from advocates, policymakers, and scholars from many fields. This attention is a timely response to the many urgent questions that this technology raises, but it can sometimes miss important considerations. This paper surveys the evidence for eight potentially surprising such points: 1. LLMs predictably get more capable with increasing investment, even without targeted innovation. 2. Many important LLM behaviors emerge unpredictably as a byproduct of increasing investment. 3. LLMs often appear to learn and use representations of the outside world. 4. There are no reliable techniques for steering the behavior of LLMs. 5. Experts are not yet able to interpret the inner workings of LLMs. 6. Human performance on a task isn't an upper bound on LLM performance. 7. LLMs need not express the values of their creators nor the values encoded in web text. 8. Brief interactions with LLMs are often misleading.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“However, it is unclear how reliable LLMs are as evaluators, as they are known to be sensitive to textual instructions and inputs (Dong et al., 2022;Turpin et al., 2023;Bowman, 2023).”
From Large Language Models are not Fair Evaluators (2024) · cites this paper as Bowman, 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325 · cited 2×
“…translation of ‘cat’ in French is‘ ”, such that a typical continuation of the text should represent a completion of the intended task (Radford et al., 2019; Raffel et al., 2020). match high-quality human demonstrations on the task (Radford et al., 2018; Devlin et al., 2019; Ouyang et al., 2022).”
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372 · cited 4×
“Large language models (LLMs, e.g. GPT-3, PALM, LLaMA, and GPT-4; Brown et al., 2020; Chowdhery et al., 2022; Touvron et al., 2023; OpenAI, 2023b) and products built on them, such as ChatGPT, have recently prompted an enormous amount of attention from journalists, (Klein, 2023; Perrigo, 2023; Oliver, 2023), policymaker…”
InfluentialMastering the game of Go with deep neural networks and tree search
Silver, D., Huang, A., Maddison, C. J., Guez, A., Sifre, L., van den Driessche, G., Schrittwieser, J., Antonoglou, I., Panneershelvam, V., Lanctot, M., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16961 · Cited by 15,612 · cited 1×
“This is analogous to the techniques used to produce superhuman performance at games like Go (Silver et al., 2016).”
Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervision
Radford, A., Kim, J. W., Hallacy, C., Ramesh, A., Goh, G., Agarwal, S., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Mishkin, P., Clark, J., et al. (2021) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2103.00020 · Cited by 15,293
Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformer
Raffel, C., Shazeer, N., Roberts, A., Lee, K., Narang, S., Matena, M., Zhou, Y., Li, W., & Liu, P. J. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1910.10683 · Cited by 10,929
Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models
Kaplan, J., McCandlish, S., Henighan, T., Brown, T. B., Chess, B., Child, R., Gray, S., Radford, A., Wu, J., & Amodei, D. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2001.08361 · Cited by 9,550 · cited 1×
“Scaling law results (Kaplan et al., 2020; Brown et al., 2020; Hoffmann et al., 2022) have been a major driving factor in the recent surge of research and investment into LLMs (Ganguli et al., 2022a).”
On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922 · Cited by 6,988 · cited 1×
“…arise with the development of deployment of large-scale AI systems, including issues around environmental impacts, access, mis-use, privacy, safety, and the concentration of power (Amodei et al., 2016; Bender et al., 2021; Bommasani et al., 2021; Birhane et al., 2022; Weidinger et al., 2022, i.a.).”
LLaMA: Open and Efficient Foundation Language Models
Touvron, H., Lavril, T., Izacard, G., Martinet, X., Lachaux, M.-A., Lacroix, T., Rozière, B., Goyal, N., Hambro, E., Azhar, F., et al. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2302.13971 · Cited by 4,602 · cited 4×
“Large language models (LLMs, e.g. GPT-3, PALM, LLaMA, and GPT-4; Brown et al., 2020; Chowdhery et al., 2022; Touvron et al., 2023; OpenAI, 2023b) and products built on them, such as ChatGPT, have recently prompted an enormous amount of attention from journalists, (Klein, 2023; Perrigo, 2023; Oliver, 2023), policymaker…”
InfluentialChain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models
Wei, J., Wang, X., Schuurmans, D., Bosma, M., Ichter, B., Xia, F., Chi, E., Le, Q., & Zhou, D. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2201.11903 · Cited by 4,263
Training Language Models to Follow Instructions with Human Feedback
Ouyang, L., Wu, J., Jiang, X., Almeida, D., Wainwright, C., Mishkin, P., Zhang, C., Agarwal, S., Slama, K., Ray, A., et al. (2022) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 · doi:10.52202/068431-2011 · Cited by 3,117
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Bengio, Y., Goodfellow, I., and Courville, A. Deep learn- ing. MIT press Cambridge, MA, USA, 2017. ISBN 9780262035613.
- Hoffmann, J., Borgeaud, S., Mensch, A., Buchatskaya, E., Cai, T., Rutherford, E., de las Casas, D., Hendricks, L. A., Welbl, J., Clark, A., Hennigan, T., Noland, E., Millican, K., van den Driessche, G., Damoc, B., Guy, A., Osindero, S., Simonyan, K., Elsen, E., Vinyals, O., Rae, J. W., and Sifre, L. An empirical analysis of compute-optimal large language model training. In Oh, A. H., Agarwal, A., Belgrave, D., and Cho, K. (eds.), Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2022. URL https: //openreview.net/forum?id=iBBcRUlOAPR.
- Levesque, H., Davis, E., and Morgenstern, L. The Winograd schema challenge. In Thirteenth international conference on the principles of knowledge representation and rea- soning, 2012.
- Lipton, Z. C. The mythos of model interpretability: In machine learning, the concept of interpretability is both important and slippery. Queue, 16(3):31-57, 2018.
- Patel, R. and Pavlick, E. Mapping language models to grounded conceptual spaces. In International Conference on Learning Representations, 2022.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–160 of 160
Voluminous yet Vacuous? Semantic Capital in an Age of Large Language Models
Nannini, L. (2023) · ETHAICS@IJCAI · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2306.01773 · Cited by 6
“• Misuse: LLMs, if not properly calibrated or deployed by malicious actors, can generate content that disrespects, misunderstands, or illegitimately appropriates information [36, 51].”
BackgroundAI Sandbagging: Language Models can Strategically Underperform on Evaluations
van der Weij, T., Hofstätter, F., Jaffe, O., Brown, S. F., & Ward, F. R. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.07358 · Cited by 5
“In Section 5.1 we examine whether a model can accurately target a specific accuracy score (calibration), and in Section 5.2 we examine whether a model can consistently emulate a lower capability profile, e.g., that of a weaker model (emulation).”
InfluentialLLMs and the Logical Space of Reasons
Sambrotta, M. (2025) · Minds and Machines · doi:10.1007/s11023-025-09751-y · Cited by 5
“In this case, we are then unable to interpret the inner workings of LLMs, and “any attempt at a precise explanation of an LLM’s behavior is doomed to be too complex for any human to understand” (Bowman, 2023).”
Foisy, L.-O. M., Drouin, J., Pelletier, C., Rivest, J., Cadieux, H., & Dufresne, Y. (2024) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2024.2444587 · Cited by 6
“OpenAI’s models are not only proprietary but also too complex for even those within the company to fully understand (Bowman, 2023).”
Enhancing Agricultural Machinery Management through Advanced LLM Integration
Johnson, E., & Wilson, N. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2407.20588 · Cited by 5
“These models, including GPT-4, FLAN-T5, and PaLM-2, have demonstrated exceptional performance in understanding and generating human-like text [10], solving complex language tasks [11], and integrating multimodal information [12,13,14,15].”
BackgroundAI in Academia: Policy Development, Ethics, and Curriculum Design
Halvorson, O. (2024) · School of Information Student Research Journal · doi:10.55917/2575-2499.1533 · Cited by 5
“"AI" is a shorthand term for a vast array of interconnecting, and sometimes, competing, technologies, protocols, and methodologies (Bowman, 2023).”
Tadeja, S. K., Godula, K., Bohné, T., & Wozniak, M. (2023) · 2023 IEEE Intl Conf on Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, Intl Conf on Pervasive Intelligence and Computing, Intl Conf on Cloud and Big Data Computing, Intl Conf on Cyber Science and Technology Congress (DASC/PiCom/CBDCom/CyberSciTech) · doi:10.1109/dasc/picom/cbdcom/cy59711.2023.10361485 · Cited by 5
Leveraging Large Language Models for DRL-Based Anti-Jamming Strategies in Zero Touch Networks
Ali, A. S., Manias, D., Shami, A., & Muhaidat, S. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.09376 · Cited by 5
“While ZTNs focus on self-optimizing network architectures, LLMs introduce novel approaches to natural language understanding and generation [9].”
BackgroundInfluentialHahn, U., & Tešić, M. (2023) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2022.0043 · Cited by 4
Administrative Decision-Making with Generative AI: The Challenge of Epistemic Boundedness
Kim, Y., Kim, J., Kim, T., & Cho, H.-C. (2026) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/00953997251409156 · Cited by 4
“Yet , the origins, reliability, and veracity of AI-generated content remain deeply uncertain (Bender et al., 2021; Bowman, 2024).”
A thematic analysis of what Australians state would change their minds on climate change
Lee, A. S. G., Kirkland, K., Stanley, S. K., Robinson, A., Leviston, Z., & Walker, I. A. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-96714-z · Cited by 2
Optimizing Psychological Counseling with Instruction-Tuned Large Language ModelsPreprint
Li, W., Sun, T., Qian, K., & Wang, W. (2024) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.13617 · Cited by 7
“However, challenges such as interpretability, ethical considerations, and the substantial computational resources required for training and deploying these models remain significant [Bubeck et al., 2023, Bommasani et al., 2021].”
BackgroundWazan, A., Taj, I., Shoufan, A., Laborde, R., & Venant, R. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2308.02441 · Cited by 4
“It is important to understand different facts about the foundation LLMs models [93]:”
BackgroundOperational Hallucination and Safety Drift in AI Agents
Yu, S., Carroll, F., & Bentley, B. L. (2026) · IEEE International Conference on AI and Data Analytics (ICAD) · doi:10.1109/icad69378.2026.11608655 · Cited by 1
“To address this gap, this paper presents a diagnostic case study that dissects the systemic risks inherent in LLM-based agentic workflows.”
Evaluating the Unseen Capabilities: How Many Theorems Do LLMs Know?Preprint
Li, X., Xin, J., Long, Q., & Su, W. J. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2506.02058 · Cited by 7
“Consequently, comprehensive evaluation of LLM capabilities is essential for identifying promising research directions and optimizing resource allocation, particularly given the substantial computational and energy requirements of AI development [46, 5].”
This Is Your Doge, If It Please You: Exploring Deception and Robustness in Mixture of LLMsPreprint
Wolf, L., Yoon, S., & Bogunovic, I. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.05856 · Cited by 3
“Safety risks and potential dangers arising from the deployment of LLMs are increasingly studied in the literature (Phuong et al., 2024; Shevlane et al., 2023; Bengio et al., 2023; Bowman, 2023).”
How to Recognize Artificial Mathematical Intelligence in Theorem Proving
Pantsar, M. (2025) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-025-10164-w · Cited by 3
“10 10 For more on the state-of-the-art, see (Bowman 2023; Zhao et al. 2023).”
Walking Backward to Ensure Risk Management of Large Language Models in Medicine
Onitiu, D., Wachter, S., & Mittelstadt, B. (2025) · The Journal of Law Medicine & Ethics · doi:10.1017/jme.2025.10132 · Cited by 3
“73 Weighing risks for their severity will be increasingly difficult, due to the variability of risks across a broad spectrum based on the model ’ s capabilities.”
Coding historical causes of death data with Large Language Models
Pedersen, B.-R., Islam, M., Kristoffersen, D. T., Bongo, L., Garrett, E., Reid, A., & Sommerseth, H. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2405.07560 · Cited by 3
“Rather, it generates a response text by continually predicting which token should be next in the sentence it is constructing [14].”
BackgroundGómez, F. J. D., & Galende, J. N. (2024) · Revista Tecnología Ciencia y Educación · doi:10.51302/tce.2024.19081 · Cited by 5
“…Chan et al. , 2022; Elhage et al. , 2021; Lovering y Pavlick, 2022)–, ninguna técnica que permita comprender completamente la forma en que el modelo efectúa estas predicciones o el tipo de conocimiento, razonamiento u objetivos subyacentes del modelo cuando produce un resultado (Bowman, 2023).”
BackgroundMartens, B. (2023) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4550753 · Cited by 7
“They make it very difficult to ‘explain’ in a transparent way what is happening inside an LLM. Bowman (2023) commented that “As of early 2023, there is no technique that would allow us to lay out in any satisfactory way what kinds of knowledge, reasoning, or goals a model is using when it produces…”
InfluentialSebastian, J. L., Moon, J.-M., & Camburn, E. M. (2025) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/23328584251389621 · Cited by 4
“LLMs such as OpenAI’s ChatGPT, Anthropic’s Claude, Meta’s Llama, and Google’s Gemini and Gemma models have received a great deal of attention recently, as they show potential to achieve advances in multiple fields and applications (Bommasani et al., 2021; Bowman, 2023).”
On the Notion that Language Models ReasonPreprint
Højer, B. (2025) · IT University Of Copenhagen (IT University of Copenhagen) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2511.11810 · Cited by 2
“They furthermore claim that reasoning emerges spontaneously from the training procedures and Wei et al. [2022] and Bowman [2023] claim that certain behaviors emerge unpredictably.”
Ahmed, N., Zaman, M. I., Saleem, G., & Hassan, A. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2510.08624 · Cited by 2
Better Language Models Exhibit Higher Visual AlignmentPreprint
Ruthardt, J., Burghouts, G., Belongie, S. J., & Asano, Y. M. (2024) · Trans. Mach. Learn. Res. · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2410.07173 · Cited by 2
“For a comprehensive evaluation, we select four datasets: AWA2 (Xian et al., 2017), CUB (Wah et al., 2011), FGVCAircraft (Maji et al., 2013), and ImageNet + , spanning natural and human-made artifacts, coarse and fine-grained categories, and varying scales ( 40 ≤ | S | ≤ 1000 ).”
The Task-oriented Queries Benchmark (ToQB)
Yim, K. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.02943 · Cited by 2
“Consequently, the accurate and efficient fulfillments of task-oriented queries have become an essential benchmark for satisfactory, efficient, or delightful human-computer interactions in the era of large language models (LLMs) [8][16] and GenAI.”
BackgroundUtilizing Large LanguageModels to Detect Privacy Leaks in Mini-App Code
Jiang, L. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.07367 · Cited by 2
“Understanding the evolution of LLMs provides crucial context for assessing their current capabilities and anticipating future developments Bowman, 2023; Chang et al., 2023; Clusmann et al., 2023; Fan et al., 2023; Hadi et al., 2023; Hou et al., 2023; Thirunavukarasu et al., 2023; J. Wu et al.,…”
BackgroundData Disquiet: Concerns about the Governance of Data for Generative AIPreprint
Aaronson, S. A. (2024) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4784412 · Cited by 1
Counseling Responses for Mental Health Forum Questions with Early Maladaptive Schema Prediction
Gollapalli, S. D., Ang, B., Du, M.-Z., & Ng, S.-K. (2024) · European Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3233/faia240785 · Cited by 2
“…reasons including the known shortcomings of LLMs such as privacy concerns, ethical implications, as well as the crucial requirement in the MH domain for machine learning model outputs to be theoretically-grounded and explainable in view of potential risk to the target care-seekers [10, 18, 25].”
BackgroundShukla, N., Pandey, K., & Tiwari, O. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.16973 · Cited by 1
“Scalable over-sight [24] addresses trust and verification in multi-tenant AI systems.”
Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Through a Christian Understanding of Human FlourishingPreprint
Skytland, N. G., Parsons, L., Llewellyn, A., Billings, S., Larson, P., Anderson, J., Boisen, S., & Runge, S. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2604.03356 · Cited by 1
“FAI-C-ST results align with a growing body of research demonstrating that large language models do not operate free of substantive normative commitments [Liang et all, 2022], [Bowman et al, 2023].”
Beyond Flat Retrieval: Towards Dynamic Graph-Augmented Generation for Complex Question Answering
Shang, Y., Tang, H., Gao, L., Jia, C., & Lin, Z. (2025) · 2025 IEEE 6th International Conference on Computer, Big Data, Artificial Intelligence (ICCBD+AI) · doi:10.1109/iccbdai66607.2025.11388033 · Cited by 1
“Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in open-domain question answering [1-4] .”
Position: AI Evaluations Should be Grounded on a Theory of CapabilityPreprint
Jo, N., & Wilson, A. (2025) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2509.19590 · Cited by 3
“Several recent works argue that AI benchmarking would benefit from similar principles (Wang et al., 2023; Raji et al., 2021), while others critique how benchmarks are built, saturated, and deployed (Kiela et al., 2021; Bowman, 2023; Dehghani et al., 2021).”
Bounding Reason: Inferentialism, Naturalism, and the Discursive Agency of LLMs
Malík, J., & Hubálek, M. (2025) · Global Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s10516-025-09761-6 · Cited by 1
“From their structure and training (Bowman 2023 ; Zhao et al. 2023 ), we know that LLMs capture language by processing large amounts of data and by learning statistical regularities in human text corpora.”
Hamzha, A., Hasan, M. S., Jahlool, A. H., Mahmoud, M. A., Khama, M. Y., Awad, R. T., & Othman, B. B. (2025) · International Conference Control and Robots · doi:10.1109/iccr67387.2025.11291769 · Cited by 1
Wu, Z.-H. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2504.01553 · Cited by 1
Chartier, M., Dakkoune, N., Bourgeois, G., & Jean, S. (2024) · European Grid Conference · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.15173 · Cited by 1
“Avec de telles masses d’informations ingurgitées, nous pouvons estimer que ces modèles sont entraînés sur des volumes de connaissances paraissant dépasser les capacités mémorielles humaines (Bowman (2023)), laissant penser à tort qu’ils auraient réponse à tout.”
BackgroundFuture-proof: Monitoring the development, deployment, and impacts of Artificial Intelligence
Ho, A. (2023) · Journal of Science Policy & Governance · doi:10.38126/jspg220305 · Cited by 3
When Giant Language Brains Just Aren't Enough! Domain Pizzazz with Knowledge Sparkle Dust
Nguyen, M. L., Nguyen, D.-H., Sabahi, S., Lê, H., Yang, J., & Hotta, H. (2023) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2305.07230 · Cited by 1
“Started by small PLMs such as GPT and BERT in 2018, training LLMs has received significant attention of research and investment from both industry and academia (Bowman, 2023).”
BackgroundTell, don't show: Declarative facts influence how LLMs generalize
Meinke, A., & Evans, O. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.07779
“In particular, when an LLM is presented with a novel input, does it merely repeat low-level statistical patterns (“stochastic parrot”) or does it utilize an abstract reasoning process – even without explicit Chain of Thought (Bender et al., 2021; Bowman, 2023; Wei et al., 2022b)?”
BackgroundDeroo, M. R. (2026) · Journal of Language Identity & Education · doi:10.1080/15348458.2026.2750492
Generative AI and the “Contextification” of Human Language
Pascal, U. (2026) · Critical AI · doi:10.1215/2834703x-12689882
Making LLMs Say What They Think: Measuring and Improving CoT-Interpretability AlignmentPreprint
Hong, Y., Ravfogel, S., Zhao, C., & Choi, E. (2026) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2609.38972
“Such alignment will improve monitorability of LLMs, enabling more reliable interpretation of model behavior and fostering greater trust in high-stakes applications (Bowman, 2023; Anwar et al., 2024).”
Controlling Refusal Behavior of LLMs via Stiefel-Constrained Rotation Steering
Bunin, K., Bylinkin, D., Aletov, V., Medyakov, D., Solodkin, V., & Beznosikov, A. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.30986
“This challenge is compounded by the black-box nature of modern models, which make their outputs challenging to predict [Bowman, 2024].”
Nai, B. D., Pattipeilohy, J. B., & Wibowo, A. (2026) · Greenation International Journal of Engineering Science · doi:10.38035/gijes.v4i2.1024
“Bowman (2024) explained that LLMs still have limitations in reasoning, factual accuracy, reliability, and context interpretation, as models depend on language distribution patterns and training data.”
Mangipudi, S. A., Flanagan, C. P., Wong-on-Wing, A., Gerstley, L., Ring, A., Okuhn, S. P., Hull, M. M., Bulbule, M. S., Sivamurthy, N., Chang, R. W., et al. (2026) · Journal of Vascular Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2026.01.046
Rahimi, S., Li, H., Esmaeiligoujar, S., Ercan, D., & Botelho, A. F. (2026) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400419.2026.2638384
“These characteristics of LLMs make retraining or fine-tuning them with new data computationally expensive and resource-intensive (Bowman, 2023; Chen et al., 2021).”
Generative AI as a ‘Precipitant’ of Challenges in Doctoral Supervision: A Dialogue Among Supervisors
Angelov, D., Morini, L., Kariyana, I., & Tshuma, N. (2026) · Open Books and Proceedings · doi:10.38140/obp4-2026-02 · Cited by 1
“…design of the technology itself: GenAI-assisted tools are trained on a vast amount of publicly available data harvested from the Internet (UNESCO, 2023, pp. 9–11) and recycled without proper attribution or a traceable pathway that can help identify the provenance of individual information items…”
InfluentialIdentification of quantum generative circuits with parallel quantum neural network
Wu, Z.-P., Huang, X., Jia, H.-Y., Shi, H., & Zhang, W.-W. (2026) · Frontiers of Physics · doi:10.15302/frontphys.2026.113201
“Recent advances in large-scale deep learning—particularly transformer-based architectures have led to the development of models exhibiting emergent cognitive capabilities that were neither explicitly programmed nor anticipated at smaller scales [23, 24].”
Patell, L., & Guest, O. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.18139
“39 O’Keefe et al., 2025; Bowman, 2023, point 4.”
Concept Component Analysis: A Principled Approach for Concept Extraction in LLMs
Liu, Y.-H., Gao, E.-D., Gong, D., van den Hengel, A., & Shi, J. (2026) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.20420
“The more general question is whether a model trained only on natural language can develop representations of concepts grounded in the real world (Bowman, 2024; Naveed et al., 2023).”
Chang, E. Y. (2025) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2601.03263
LLM Hallucination: The Curse That Cannot Be Broken
Al-Mahmood, H. (2025) · Iraqi Journal for Computers and Informatics · doi:10.25195/ijci.v51i2.546
“However, Bowman [12] emphasizes that straightforward attempts to manage hallucination might fail silently, making the models appear more trustworthy than they are.”
Text Retrieval in Restricted Domains by Pairwise Term Co-occurrence
Sneiders, E., & Henriksson, A. (2024) · Complex Systems Informatics and Modeling Quarterly · doi:10.7250/csimq.2024-41.05
“Generative AI [3], large language models (LLMs) [4], and text embeddings are among the latest achievements in NLP. Today, the research in textual IR revolves largely around the combination of Machine Learning (ML) and NLP for solving IR tasks such as question answering [5], [6], text retrieval [7]…”
Making Sense of the Technical Strengths and Limitations of LLMs
Stone, M. (2024) · Critical AI · doi:10.1215/2834703x-11556020
Enhancing AI-Driven Psychological Consultation: Layered Prompts with Large Language Models
Souza, R., Lim, J.-H., & Davis, A. (2024) · arXiv.org · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2408.16276
“Researchers are actively exploring methods to align LLMs with ethical standards and mitigate these risks, ensuring their safe and responsible deployment [20,21].”
BackgroundMathematical Insights into Large Language Models
Gopalan, R. (2024) · International Journal of Modern Statistics · doi:10.47941/ijms.2006
Armstrong, R. (2023) · Journal of Critical Realism · doi:10.1080/14767430.2023.2276591
“Current discussions of Large Language Models are one example where the technology works for what it was built for without its designers fully understanding how or why it works (Bowman 2023).”
Garcia-Chavez, A. D. J., Gutiérrez-López, E., Flores, D., González-Fraga, J. A., Montes-y-Gómez, M., & Chávez, E. (2026) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2026.3717256
“While no method fully reveals the knowledge, reasoning, or concepts a model uses to generate outputs [100], we argue that their inefficiency in these tasks stems largely from limited competence in discerning semantic similarity between events [101] and evaluating key phrases [102].”
Untitled work
Chan, C. K. Y., Lo, N., & Wong, G. (2024)
Metadata
- Authors
- Bowman, S. R.
- Corresponding author
- Bowman, Samuel R.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2834-703X (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2304.00612
- OpenAlex
- W4410559688
- Cited by
- 137
- References
- 128
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 39
- FWCI
- 40.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Critical AI (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2046556, 1922658)
- Open Philanthropy Project
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
- Keywords
- large language models, emergent behavior, AI policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review