Cerebras-GPT: Open Compute-Optimal Language Models Trained on the Cerebras Wafer-Scale Cluster
Open accessAbstract
We study recent research advances that improve large language models through efficient pre-training and scaling, and open datasets and tools. We combine these advances to introduce Cerebras-GPT, a family of open compute-optimal language models scaled from 111M to 13B parameters. We train Cerebras-GPT models on the Eleuther Pile dataset following DeepMind Chinchilla scaling rules for efficient pre-training (highest accuracy for a given compute budget). We characterize the predictable power-law scaling and compare Cerebras-GPT with other publicly-available models to show all Cerebras-GPT models have state-of-the-art training efficiency on both pre-training and downstream objectives. We describe our learnings including how Maximal Update Parameterization ($μ$P) can further improve large model scaling, improving accuracy and hyperparameter predictability at scale. We release our pre-trained models and code, making this paper the first open and reproducible work comparing compute-optimal model scaling to models trained on fixed dataset sizes. Cerebras-GPT models are available on HuggingFace: https://huggingface.co/cerebras.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
For dense transformers, training data size should scale roughly with the square root of training compute.
“consistent with neural scaling laws for dense transformers which suggest that training data size should scale roughly with the square root of training compute (Hoffmann et al., 2022; Dey et al., 2023; Fetterman et al., 2023).”
From Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated data (2022) · cites this paper as Dey et al., 2023
Cites
Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models
Kaplan, J., McCandlish, S., Henighan, T., Brown, T. B., Chess, B., Child, R., Gray, S., Radford, A., Wu, J., & Amodei, D. (2020) · arXiv · Cited by 1,749 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Scaling law studies show predictable and significant improvements in model performance by increasing model and dataset size (Hestness et al., 2017; Kaplan et al., 2020).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Generative AI in cybersecurity: A comprehensive review of LLM applications and vulnerabilities
Ferrag, M. A., Alwahedi, F., Battah, A., Cherif, B., Mechri, A., Tihanyi, N., Bisztray, T., & Debbah, M. (2025) · Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems · doi:10.1016/j.iotcps.2025.01.001 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Generative language models exhibit social identity biases
Hu, T., Kyrychenko, Y., Rathje, S., Collier, N., van der Linden, S., & Roozenbeek, J. (2024) · Nature Computational Science · doi:10.1038/s43588-024-00741-1 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated data
Villalobos, P., Ho, A., Sevilla, J., Besiroglu, T., Heim, L., & Hobbhahn, M. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2211.04325 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
“…as the biggest ones on our list. demand for larger training datasets, consistent with neural scaling laws for dense transformers which suggest that training data size should scale roughly with the square root of training compute (Hoffmann et al., 2022; Dey et al., 2023; Fetterman et al., 2023).”
BackgroundLamaakal, I., Maleh, Y., El Makkaoui, K., Ouahbi, I., Pławiak, P., Alfarraj, O., Almousa, M., & Abd El-Latif, A. A. (2025) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s25051318 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dey, N., Gosal, G., Zhiming, Chen, Khachane, H., Marshall, W., Pathria, R., Tom, M., & Hestness, J.
- Affiliations
- Charles
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2023
- ISSN
- 2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
- arXiv
- 2304.03208
- OpenAlex
- W4362707004
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 5
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- large language models, power-law scaling
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review